Strength of Schedule for SB winners

[still_life]

For some reason it won't let me post it, saying I have 6 images when I really have 0, but I'll try posting it as a reply here.

[still_life]

1. 79 Steelers (.529)
2. 88 49ers (.512)
3. 80 Raiders (.508)
4. 96 Packers (.504)
5. 91 Redskins (.504)
6. 90 Giants (.500)
7. 95 Cowboys (.496)
8. 93 Cowboys (.496)
9. 83 Raiders (.496)
10. 04 Patriots (.492)
11. 77 Cowboys (.485)
12. 03 Patriots (.484)
13. 97 Broncos (.484)
14. 02 Bucs (.482)
15. 82 Redskins (.481)
16. 67 Packers (.477)
17. 69 Chiefs (.476)
18. 86 Giants (.474)
19. 85 Bears (.473)
20. 76 Raiders (.469)
21. 75 Steelers (.469)
22. 94 49ers (.465)
23. 89 49ers (.457)
24. 81 49ers (.457)
25. 66 Packers (.457)
26. 98 Broncos (.453)
27. 01 Patriots (.449)
28. 79 Steelers (.449)
29. 71 Cowboys (.449)
30. 68 Jets (.438)
31. 74 Steelers (.431)
32. 87 Redskins (.427)
33. 92 Cowboys (.426)
34. 00 Ravens (.426)
35. 84 49ers (.425)
36. 73 Dolphins (.422)
37. 70 Colts (.364)
38. 99 Rams (.363)
39. 72 Dolphins (.363)

That is why you're not going to see a team go undefeated in a 19 game season, because the schedule will be tough enough where they have to play a quality team that will beat them. Not all teams can have the cupcake schedule like those geezers in Miami.

And if you're wondering, the Colts were somewhere around .440 I believe.

[somethingyellow]

cool

[still_life]

Ok, why does the "8" randomly turn into a "cool" icon?

[mouood]

Ok, why does the "8" randomly turn into a "cool" icon?

8 + ) = 8)

thats cool though.

[Drew Beringer]

Ahhh, the 96 Packers, bring back the memories.

[still_life]

Yes, very good GB team. #1 in scoring offense, #1 in scoring defense.

I like seeing the Steelers #1 on this list, though I notice I have the 79 team twice. One of those should be 78. I'll look at it later to figure out which is which.

[weezer182]

look at all the 49ers up there :D

[mikeford]

im shocked the 01 pats isnt higher since we had no business making the superbowl that year, let alone beating the rams.

[Doug]

im shocked the 01 pats isnt higher since we had no business making the superbowl that year, let alone beating the rams.

that's why it's not higher. we got a pretty easy schedule based on our earlier pitiful efforts.

[sundaysetsashes]

i dont think the strength of schedule has anything to do with how good/bad you are. there is a set roation the NFL has in place. the eagles had a cupcake schedule this year and if he wouldnt have had the shit we have had this year, we could have cruised to a title. i mean we had the rams, cardinals, and 9ers in one year. and we went to the SB last year. i could be wrong

[justinevans]

i dont think the strength of schedule has anything to do with how good/bad you are. there is a set roation the NFL has in place. the eagles had a cupcake schedule this year and if he wouldnt have had the shit we have had this year, we could have cruised to a title. i mean we had the rams, cardinals, and 9ers in one year. and we went to the SB last year. i could be wrong

no, the strength of schedule is based on last year's standings. the eagles schedule was actually not that much of a cupcake schedule. chiefs, chargers, broncos, seahawks, redskins, redskins, cowboys, cowboys, giants, giants, falcons are all tough games. especially when the eagles had to goto kansas city and denver which are two of the hardest places to play in, in all of football.

their strength of schedule was so low because well, their entire division went 6-10 last year.

[still_life]

I'm pretty sure these numbers are for the teams they played in the year they won SB, which is how it should be.

[justinevans]

I'm pretty sure these numbers are for the teams they played in the year they won SB, which is how it should be.

Maybe? But the rankings of the strength of schedule come out at the beginning of the season.

[NetNerdsRevenge]

does this include postseason?

EDIT: Guess not if paris is right...

[fredrico0012]

Colts lost.