PDA

View Full Version : Who is superior?


Brand-new-123
06/03/09, 08:06 PM
Men or Women?

Alex DiVincenzo
06/03/09, 08:17 PM
Chicks with dicks: the best of both worlds

Brand-new-123
06/03/09, 08:20 PM
Chicks with dicks: the best of both worlds

very true

doppelganger
06/04/09, 02:17 PM
men will sadly always be superior in a social setting. i hardly doubt women will ever become superior to men. good thing america is sexist...

TotalCollapse
06/04/09, 03:24 PM
Neither

Colin1755
06/05/09, 12:26 PM
women rule us men

IWasaCamera
06/05/09, 12:58 PM
Women because Dallas Green is male.

Brand-new-123
06/05/09, 01:19 PM
Women because Dallas Green is male.
best reasoning so far

jbergamotto
06/06/09, 11:07 AM
Women have a power over men with their allure and sexiness (unless you're homosexual). I'm not saying that men don't give this vibe off but most cases in this situation end up in the female's favor. In that vein, I say they are superior IMO.

brandnewsheep
06/07/09, 05:36 AM
Women, but i'm biased.

yoyostring
06/07/09, 01:15 PM
superior..

http://blogs.palmbeachpost.com/tvtalk/files/2009/01/kate.jpg

HipYoungGun
06/07/09, 01:31 PM
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

While women were busy learning how to birth children, men learned how to pee standing up. Evolution.

By they way, this is a joke for all you fantastic kids who love to pick apart everything on these boards.

MyNameIsRoss
06/07/09, 02:12 PM
We penetrate them...enough said.

/thread

kdefrisc
06/08/09, 12:55 AM
yikes i shouldn't have looked

briewer
06/08/09, 02:00 AM
Wtf does 'naturally superior' mean? If you're talking physical strength, there's really no question to be asked. If you're talking intelligence, than this picture, showing the results of the 2008 presidential election by gender (blue being Obama, red being McCain, duh), pretty much sums up my opinion:
http://8937186704367661082-a-1802744773732722657-s-sites.googlegroups.com/site/brianriewer/Home/Picture1.png
But then again, you're trying to make a general decision on the 'superiority' of one of two different groups of 3 billion people, which is ridiculous to begin with. You've pretty much just given a forum for misogynists to flaunt their prejudices.

Broden Terry
06/08/09, 05:53 AM
I was hoping for an "equal" option :shrug:

WhoSaidThat?
06/08/09, 05:28 PM
This is lol wut-worthy.

Croggs
06/10/09, 12:51 AM
That depends, what's Rosie O'Donnell supposed to be again?

bv_princess1
06/10/09, 05:34 AM
Wtf does 'naturally superior' mean? If you're talking physical strength, there's really no question to be asked. If you're talking intelligence, than this picture, showing the results of the 2008 presidential election by gender (blue being Obama, red being McCain, duh), pretty much sums up my opinion:
http://8937186704367661082-a-1802744773732722657-s-sites.googlegroups.com/site/brianriewer/Home/Picture1.png
But then again, you're trying to make a general decision on the 'superiority' of one of two different groups of 3 billion people, which is ridiculous to begin with. You've pretty much just given a forum for misogynists to flaunt their prejudices.

chill, i think its something good to talk about instead of nothing. :-)

briewer
06/10/09, 11:01 AM
chill, i think its something good to talk about instead of nothing. :-)

That's assuming everyone acts like an adult, but you know as well as I that this is never the case on this site.

jwicklun
06/13/09, 12:55 AM
I voted men, despite the fact most woman are masters of manipulation.

DejaNew
06/13/09, 11:31 AM
Animals.

skellorock
06/14/09, 07:35 PM
6Y9BukEBI9c

classic

AussieBoy
06/17/09, 10:56 PM
i did women cause if more of them ran the world it would probably be less fucked up

plus theyre hotter


just get rid off menstruation, hate that shit!

Kill_the_radio
06/18/09, 07:14 AM
I was hoping for an "equal" option :shrug:

this