Kosovo and Iraq

[BrandNewRock05]

I have asked this before, but why didn't anyone have a problem when we took a tyrant out of power in Kosovo? But we do have a problem when we are doing the same thing in Iraq. It doesnt make sense to me. Oh wait! I know! Maybe its because Clinton was president during Kosovo, so its not a big deal. But now since Bush is president everything he does is wrong, just because you are pissed he is a republican. If Clinton made a tax cut, he would be god, but when Bush does it he's wasting money. Shit bricks, if Bush got a blowjob from some intern he would get shot. Clinton on the other hand was re-elected. Don't be pissed that you lost the election you fuckin liberals. Just get over it.

[therealhebm]

dude in kosovo the world was on our side, now they're not. i still support gettin saddam out but you can't compare the 2 situations.

[BrandNewRock05]

Originally posted by therealhebm
dude in kosovo the world was on our side, now they're not. i still support gettin saddam out but you can't compare the 2 situations.
Thats exactly why I am comparing them. Why isnt the world on our side? Because no body except for me and Texas likes Bush really. If Clinton declared war on Iraq, everybody would like that idea, because he appeals to the liberals (because he's a democrat) and as well to the conservatives (because we are pro-active, we like to get the job done, kick ass and punish those who deserve to be punished). So Kosovo was supported. Iraq isnt as fully supported however because Bush is a republican. He doesnt have that appeal to the liberals as Clinton did, so he lacks a lot of support. Its like when a teacher who you like asks you to do a project. You are more willing to do a better job at it than for a teacher who you dont like

[evil zach]

I'm sorry but you didn't get rid of Milosovic. His government was overthrown by the citizens of Kosovo.

[yeat182]

Originally posted by therealhebm
dude in kosovo the world was on our side, now they're not. i still support gettin saddam out but you can't compare the 2 situations.


the world was not on our side, we didnt' get UN approval because the french refused to support millitary action. the US bombed Milosovic's troops and allowed the people to then capture him and remove him from power. with out US intervention, he'd have stayed in power and killed many more innocent people.

[billcom6]

Originally posted by therealhebm
dude in kosovo the world was on our side, now they're not. i still support gettin saddam out but you can't compare the 2 situations.

the current 'coalition of the willing' that agree with Bush's stance is the third largest such coalition in the last 100 years, so how exactly is the world not on our side?

[Justin_stacy]

Originally posted by billcom6
the current 'coalition of the willing' that agree with Bush's stance is the third largest such coalition in the last 100 years, so how exactly is the world not on our side?

The number is now at thirty, so your right, the world isn't against us, just old "ultra liberal europe" is, and now even Germany has signed on with us.

[SubtleAsABrick]

most of the countries that are in that coalition are unimportant, i wish some of the more important countries would start freekin supporting us... and are you sure Germany is with us? where did you hear that?

[Justin_stacy]

Originally posted by SubtleAsABrick
most of the countries that are in that coalition are unimportant, i wish some of the more important countries would start freekin supporting us... and are you sure Germany is with us? where did you hear that?

Calling a country unimportant is stupid. Some of these countries are former USSR states and know what true dictatorship is like.

Germany granted us use of there air space, and you can find a link for this at any news site.

[yeat182]

none of the nations are un-important. even if they don't donate troops to the war, they support the action with money and other types of man power, you can never have too much support.