Iraq says that US should stand by Un Resolutions.

[Justin_stacy]

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=574&ncid=574&e=1&u=/nm/20030322/wl_nm/iraq_appeal_dc

What do you guys think.


The Arabic-language statement added: "Security Council resolutions must be respected and implemented, starting with the lifting of the unjust sanctions against Iraq, disarming the Zionist entity (Israel) of weapons of mass destruction to create a region without weapons of mass destruction in the Middle East."


So now they want to follow the Resolutions?

[evil zach]

I think both sides are hypcrites.

[yeat182]

that is the most ridiculous thing i've ever heard. if they'd followed the resolutions in the first place, none of this would have happened.

[Alex Djaferis]

Originally posted by evil zach
I think both sides are hypcrites.

[BrandNewRock05]

Originally posted by yeat182
that is the most ridiculous thing i've ever heard. if they'd followed the resolutions in the first place, none of this would have happened.
saddam is a dumbass

[The Nephilm]

Originally posted by BrandNewRock05
saddam is a dumbass

and so is bush

what's your point?

[BrandNewRock05]

Originally posted by The Nephilm
and so is bush

what's your point?
bush is a good man, saddam is evil

[Justin_stacy]

Originally posted by The Nephilm
and so is bush

what's your point?

Thats really a great opinion!

[The Nephilm]

Originally posted by BrandNewRock05
bush is a good man, saddam is evil

they are both corrupt, evil, cowards.

how exactly is Bush "good"? what has he done that has been moral and good?

execute innocent prisoners?

start a crusade into the middle east?

dodge vietnam?

rig the election?

you are a very, very sad individual.

[Alex Djaferis]

i love the way ppl are allowed to express opinions here without being bashed on. :rolleyes:

[Justin_stacy]

Originally posted by The Nephilm
they are both corrupt, evil, cowards.

how exactly is Bush "good"? what has he done that has been moral and good?

execute innocent prisoners?

start a crusade into the middle east?

dodge vietnam?

rig the election?

you are a very, very sad individual.

Executing the criminals of a texas when juries have asked you to, is not evil or corrupt, and it shows that hes doing his job.

Hes not starting a crusade, hes doing what 70% of Americans want, and i bet it kills you that most americans stand by him and are smart enough to know the evils that saddum stands for.

Alot of politions dodged this, and although i think its bad that they did, i think you need to be critical of people in both parties that did this. Also say Mccain won, what agruements would you use against him if he went to war.

As for the elections get over it, i know people on the right side wouldn't have be sulking (i know i spelled that wrong) as much as you on the left are if gore had won, which really would have been a theft of the elections. Just get over it, and just think god (or what ever you belive in) that Gore wasn't president when sept. 11 happened.

[The Nephilm]

Originally posted by Justin_stacy
Executing the criminals of a texas when juries have asked you to, is not evil or corrupt, and it shows that hes doing his job.

Hes not starting a crusade, hes doing what 70% of Americans want, and i bet it kills you that most americans stand by him and are smart enough to know the evils that saddum stands for.

Alot of politions dodged this, and although i think its bad that they did, i think you need to be critical of people in both parties that did this. Also say Mccain won, what agruements would you use against him if he went to war.

As for the elections get over it, i know people on the right side wouldn't have be sulking (i know i spelled that wrong) as much as you on the left are if gore had won, which really would have been a theft of the elections. Just get over it, and just think god (or what ever you belive in) that Gore wasn't president when sept. 11 happened.

He could have saved a few convicted murders when DNA evidence proved them innocent, but he didn't.

I'm not just talking about Iraq. He's already destroyed Afghanastan, Iraq won't fare any better, and there is no doubt we are going into Iran because they are part of the "axis of evil".

I'm not saying that the other parties aren't responsible, but the man has ordered 250,000 troops to go to war when he bought his way out of Vietnam.

I won't get over it until Bush resigns and makes Gore president. And if he had been president during 9/11 I'm sure he wouldn't have been stupid enough to listen to the War Hawks in his cabinet and piss North Korea off, thus resulting in Cold War part deux.

[BrandNewRock05]

Originally posted by The Nephilm

rig the election?

Are you on crack? The election was fair, our country runs on an electoral college, not a popular vote, and Bush is in office, so it looks like Gore lost.

[The Nephilm]

Originally posted by BrandNewRock05
Are you on crack? The election was fair, our country runs on an electoral college, not a popular vote, and Bush is in office, so it looks like Gore lost.

I've already proved that Gore won the election. We've had this conversation before.

And yes, I am a crack addict.

[BrandNewRock05]

Originally posted by The Nephilm
I've already proved that Gore won the election. We've had this conversation before.

And yes, I am a crack addict.
You didnt prove shit, you whined. And if Gore won, how come the then Democraticaly favored congress allowed Bush to take office? Huh?

[The Nephilm]

Originally posted by BrandNewRock05
You didnt prove shit, you whined. And if Gore won, how come the then Democraticaly favored congress allowed Bush to take office? Huh?

Fucking christ...

CONGRESS DID NOT ELECT THE PRESIDENT. THE SUPREME COURT DID.

And Scalia, who was appointed by Bush's daddy, gave him the presidency.

And let's not forget illegal overseas ballots being counted, black's not being allowed to vote (constitutionally illegal) and only certain counties of votes being re-counted. Even without the black vote and with the recounts, gore still won the state of florida by 56 votes because of the 594 illegal overseas ballots that were post-dated, unsigned, or were corrupted in other ways.

[BrandNewRock05]

Originally posted by The Nephilm
Fucking christ...

CONGRESS DID NOT ELECT THE PRESIDENT. THE SUPREME COURT DID.

And Scalia, who was appointed by Bush's daddy, gave him the presidency.

And let's not forget illegal overseas ballots being counted, black's not being allowed to vote (constitutionally illegal) and only certain counties of votes being re-counted. Even without the black vote and with the recounts, gore still won the state of florida by 56 votes because of the 594 illegal overseas ballots that were post-dated, unsigned, or were corrupted in other ways.
Congress=electoral college dumbass. And find me this information you keep spewing out of your ass, it sounds like something from the liberal "weekly world news"

[EmoMoose86]

Here are some of them:

So you're saying that Bush MURDERED prisoners! Even though they had been tried --- which is law. I'll believe you when you've gone and pulled up the trials of everyone who recieved the death penalty in Texas during Bush Jr's job as Governer, and proved that they were tried unfairly.

AND you're also saying that we "destroyed" afghanistan. So you would have rather had Bush say "oh- 9/11 happened- we know exactly where al-queda (spelling?) is--- so we're just gonna sit around and do nothing!" No. They went in and took out most of Al-Q and did a regime change that harboured those terrorists. There is NOTHING wrong with that- name things wrong with that- and before you open your mouth and spew out gunk... please keep in mind what might have happened if we didn't go into afghanistan.

Iraq...
They are inhumane
They have Chemicals
They have an evil dictator--- and regime
Going to this war with them is necessary- and there's no argument because it's happening- and 67% of the US supports the War. So stop whining about it!

I would love for you to admit that Bush has already proven you wrong with the discovery of chemical weapons today- I can recall you repeating "there is no evidence there is no evidence" well- here it is.

Whole 'nam thing--- evidence would be lovely. I may believe it- but I also love how you rag on about bush being a dodger- when you admit that if a draft comes in affect- you'd dodge yourself. That makes you cowardly... and hypocritical! Are you hypocrtical on perpose?!

Did you know that Clinton during the war in Kosovo (with GORE) went to the UN and asked if they made a resolution- would it be passed?
Guess what? China and Russia said they would veto it.
So they went in anyway (without UN support mind you)
North Korea?! Do you know what Clinton's stance on world affairs was? Lets give the bad countries money so that they dont bother us! Its true. Clinton gave North Korea billions just to play nice. And you say Bush is Corrupt?!
(APR news- heard it last night while driving home)

Election- All i have heard when the subject comes up- is different things- like... pages and pages and pages of you talking about different things - i would love to see these credible resources that perhaps the government- or the state of Flordia- or even some Information Buearu has written.

ah- sorry- just had to get that all out.

[yeat182]

Originally posted by The Nephilm
I won't get over it until Bush resigns and makes Gore president. And if he had been president during 9/11 I'm sure he wouldn't have been stupid enough to listen to the War Hawks in his cabinet and piss North Korea off, thus resulting in Cold War part deux.


come on neph, you aren't seriously comparing Saddam to Bush are you? i mean, bush certainly has his flaws, but there is no way he is on the same plane as saddam.


also, the north korea situiation is their attempt to blackmail the US for money and aid, just ast they did to Clinton during his administration. Clinton, right or wrong, decided just to pay them off, and Bush, so far, has decided that he isn't going to follow that strategy, since, it obviously didn't work out in the long run.

[unopinionated]

in some cases war brings peace.

someone i know visited colorado a few years ago and was walking down the streets in a bad neighborhood. He was jumped by about 20 guys. Unlucky for them he was a black belt master and was able to use his skills in self defense to get out of there alive. After word spread about what happened the city totally fixed up the neighborhood. Now there theres a good (not perfect) example to how a conflict (like the US attacking Iraq) can bring peace to such a bad area.

bush is a a smart and brave man, unlike clinton, to finally put an end to suddams mad reign. The UN wont have anything to do with Iraq unitl we've taken Baghdad

[BrandNewRock05]

Originally posted by unopinionated
in some cases war brings peace.

someone i know visited colorado a few years ago and was walking down the streets in a bad neighborhood. He was jumped by about 20 guys. Unlucky for them he was a black belt master and was able to use his skills in self defense to get out of there alive. After word spread about what happened the city totally fixed up the neighborhood. Now there theres a good (not perfect) example to how a conflict (like the US attacking Iraq) can bring peace to such a bad area.

bush is a a smart and brave man, unlike clinton, to finally put an end to suddams mad reign. The UN wont have anything to do with Iraq unitl we've taken Baghdad
Clinton wasnt a dumb man, he was a political genius. No body in their right mind wants to go to war, and Clinton continued this to get reelected. However Clinton is a selfish man. He knew all about what Saddam was doing and chose to do nothing. Bush, on the other hand is more of a humanitarian than Clinton, because he is proactive and did something about the suffering in Iraq

[Justin_stacy]

Originally posted by The Nephilm

I won't get over it until Bush resigns and makes Gore president. And if he had been president during 9/11 I'm sure he wouldn't have been stupid enough to listen to the War Hawks in his cabinet and piss North Korea off, thus resulting in Cold War part deux.

Ya he probably would have backed down to the Taliband and AL Queda, and offered them some kind of $ payment to not attack us again, much like the French and Germains have done.

But would that have been a good thing, such a cowardly act, no, what we did was the right thing, appeasement NEVER work and that is the only option the Democrates ever put forth.