PDA

View Full Version : Saddam : King of Terror


yeat182
03/27/03, 08:26 AM
There is a great book called, "Saddam: King Of Terror" and its written by a guy named Con Coughlin, he's the executive editor for the london times. the book is a biography of saddam and lays out just how evil he is.

today on the radio they did an interview with him, it was very interesting, you can listen to it here:

Radio Interview (http://www.weei.com/mp3/March/032703_ConCoughlin_DN.mp3)

if that link doesn't work go here: Scroll down to Dale and Neumy, its the first one under the heading.... (http://www.weei.com/weei_audiovault.shtml)

Want Bush Dead
03/27/03, 11:29 AM
try reading some michael moore u dumb fuck

yeat182
03/27/03, 12:16 PM
why?

yeat182
03/27/03, 03:23 PM
i forgot to mention, that the author makes the case that saddam had prior knowlege about 9/11, linking him with al-qaeda, yet he doesn't claim that saddam was responsible for the attack.

evil zach
03/27/03, 04:24 PM
Originally posted by broknhartedlosr
michael moore! HAH! that's hilarious. his documentary was a joke. it shouldn't even be called a documentary, it was all fiction. those heston speeches he used were completely unrelated to columbine. i read a big long paper about how fraudulent that piece of tripe was after i saw it, and i lost all respect for that guy.

don't get me wrong, i'm pro-gun control. but michael moore is just an idiot. no one should pay any attention to anything he has to say. he's a liar and a fraud.

and buddy. listen here. you can't read one book (one EXTREMELY BIASED) book, and consider yourself an expert on anything. you have to look at an issue from all sides. you have to read books from both the right wing perspective and the leftist as well. reading any amount of michael moore books won't give you an accurate depiction of an issue (even if the book was factual, which is highly unlikely) because michael moore will only depict an issue as he sees it. it is almost completely impossible to find an objective writer, because everyone has their own agenda. you have to read multiple articles, multiple books, and take in multiple perspectives or you'll never get an accurate view of what's really going on.
Micheal moor has the potential to very influental. To bad hes such a wad

yeat182
03/27/03, 04:26 PM
yeah, i like his other documentaries, roger and me, and the big one...but now, he's just being a dick

yeat182
03/27/03, 04:37 PM
has anyone listened to the interview?

Justin_stacy
03/27/03, 06:40 PM
Originally posted by evil zach
Micheal moor has the potential to very influental. To bad hes such a wad

All he does is write slogans and propaganda, that doesn't mean he has/knows the substances to back it up.

bossydacow
03/28/03, 04:27 AM
Originally posted by yeat182
i forgot to mention, that the author makes the case that saddam had prior knowlege about 9/11, linking him with al-qaeda, yet he doesn't claim that saddam was responsible for the attack.


didn't our government have some prior knowledge about 9/11. I think the lady who called us on it is from my state.

Stompemplay
03/28/03, 04:34 AM
Originally posted by Justin_stacy
All he does is write slogans and propaganda, that doesn't mean he has/knows the substances to back it up.

Originally posted by broknhartedlosr
don't get me wrong, i'm pro-gun control. but michael moore is just an idiot. no one should pay any attention to anything he has to say. he's a liar and a fraud.


hmmm.......reminds me of our president.

cornecopria
03/28/03, 04:47 AM
All he does is write slogans and propaganda, that doesn't mean he has/knows the substances to back it up.
don't get me wrong, i'm pro-gun control. but michael moore is just an idiot. no one should pay any attention to anything he has to say. he's a liar and a fraud.

hmmm.......reminds me of our president.
nicely said