Necrophilia

[bung]

Let's say a person signs an advance directive saying that, in the event of their death, they agree to allow their spouse to use their body for sexual gratification in any way they please, for as long as they desire. Should this be legal? Morally speaking, if one person consents that they fully support their spouse using their body in such a way after they die, would this be wrong?

What are people's thoughts on this?

[Praetor]

I don't see a problem with that. Seems like any opposition to this hypothetical would be based on "eww that's gross".

[Z-train]

As nasty as it seems,it isnt harming anyone.The only effect it gives is happienness to the corpse fucker.

[SLOWPOKE LOPEZ]

I don't see a problem with that. Seems like any opposition to this hypothetical would be based on "eww that's gross".
yeah besides the medical risks and the mental health issues involved, 'eww thats gross' is the only reason people might object to it. :rolleyes:

i really wish the rolleyes smiley wasn't smiling. because im not smiling. and i really think this is the most ridiculously dumb idea i've seen posted here.

[J.C.]

It's a health issue.

[thehereaway]

Slightly concerned as to why you felt the need to make this thread?

[peder458]

yeah besides the medical risks and the mental health issues involved, 'eww thats gross' is the only reason people might object to it. :rolleyes:

i really wish the rolleyes smiley wasn't smiling. because im not smiling. and i really think this is the most ridiculously dumb idea i've seen posted here.

what i was thinking. especially the mental health issues.

[saysmydoctor]

Shotgun Marilyn Monroe.

[andrewshungry]

shotgun abe lincoln

[thespearkid]

um, i probably wouldn't support any legislation against it. of course, there are health risks with such behavior but it isn't really the governments job to make us not do unhealthy shit (especially since we don't have a universal healthcare system yet).

[BryterJonah]

I'd prefer being eaten as opposed to eating somebody out. :shrug:

[The Personist]

Shotgun Marilyn Monroe.

Dammit. Came in here to say this.

[samsara]

I think that would be rather disgusting.

[mattmatumbo]

'bought time we had a thread about this.

[whataclush]

sounds fine to me....but very creepy.

[zion the lion]

Security issues, privacy issues, and health issues (both mental and phsyical) would be my only problems with this kind of thing. Other than that, it's not a big deal, just a body.

[liquideasy]

Security issues, privacy issues, and health issues (both mental and phsyical) would be my only problems with this kind of thing. Other than that, it's not a big deal, just a body.

Forget the idea that it is, in fact, totally gross. There's no way someone could have a "physical relationship" with a corpse without - at the very least - developing those things.

[zion the lion]

Forget the idea that it is, in fact, totally gross. There's no way someone could have a "physical relationship" with a corpse without - at the very least - developing those things.

It's just lump of flesh, if you just ignore the fact that it has absolutely no animation, there's not much different. It's almost like masturbation, just with another body.

[My Broken Fever]

It's just lump of flesh, if you just ignore the fact that it has absolutely no animation, there's not much different. It's almost like masturbation, just with another body. Sounds like marriage.

[liquideasy]

It's just lump of flesh, if you just ignore the fact that it has absolutely no animation, there's not much different. It's almost like masturbation, just with another body.

Fine, but can a sane person actually do that? Pretend a corpse is just a hunk of meat?

[zion the lion]

Fine, but can a sane person actually do that? Pretend a corpse is just a hunk of meat?

what do you mean pretend? It is a hunk of (soon to be) rotting meat. It's not living, it's not breathing, it's just meat. Like a dead cow, pig, or chicken, its just meat, nothing more, nothing less.

[liquideasy]

what do you mean pretend? It is a hunk of (soon to be) rotting meat. It's not living, it's not breathing, it's just meat. Like a dead cow, pig, or chicken, its just meat, nothing more, nothing less.

So, if you were to just randomly find a dead body on the street, you'd just be like: "hmm, whatever" ?

[zion the lion]

So, if you were to just randomly find a dead body on the street, you'd just be like: "hmm, whatever" ?

I would call the police so they could identify it and notify the family. If you're asking if I would freak out...nope.

[BryterJonah]

Fine, but can a sane person actually do that? Pretend a corpse is just a hunk of meat?
http://blogs.menupages.com/sanfrancisco/hamburgler305.jpg

[Theseventhson]

Ewwww that's gross!!!!!1!!11!!!!

[dddaniel]

this reminds me of the Chuck Palahniuk novel, Lullaby. On topic though, absolutely not.

[katiebaima]

zombie apocalypse now

[Praetor]

Some insane misrepresentation of the argument ITT.

[saysmydoctor]

I agree, people should read the original post for what it truly was. It's not like he is proposing we exhume dead bodies and start having skeletal orgies. Chillax folks.

[bung]

It's a health issue.

I'd say its illegality is more based on a moral issue.

[The Pharmacist]

Slightly concerned as to why you felt the need to make this thread?


seconded.

[GeeBee]

seconded.

Thirded. I propose the thread be locked. This is a bit much.

[bung]

Thirded. I propose the thread be locked. This is a bit much.

Seriously?

[GeeBee]

Seriously?

It's pretty tasteless, and there's no real hope of intelligent conversation regarding the matter. I guess it should just resolve itself of its own volition, but I wouldn't be upset if it was locked.

[fightinirish217]

Slightly concerned as to why you felt the need to make this thread?

My thoughts as well. Kinda freaked out, a lot.

[bung]

It's pretty tasteless, and there's no real hope of intelligent conversation regarding the matter. I guess it should just resolve itself of its own volition, but I wouldn't be upset if it was locked.

Tasteless? In what way? Seems to me like a perfectly valid moral and legal issue to discuss.

[GeeBee]

Tasteless? In what way? Seems to me like a perfectly valid moral and legal issue to discuss.

Violating the bodies of the dead
Immoral because they can't consent and it's perverted
Illegal because you violate the rights of the deceased

/discussion

If you want a conversation about necrophilia just for kicks, just admit it. But don't pretend like there's that much to discuss about the immorality/illegality of it.

[bung]

Violating the bodies of the dead
Immoral because they can't consent and it's perverted
Illegal because you violate the rights of the deceased

/discussion

If you want a conversation about necrophilia just for kicks, just admit it. But don't pretend like there's that much to discuss about the immorality/illegality of it.

Do you know what an advance directive is?

[GeeBee]

Do you know what an advance directive is?

Yes. It doesn't cover iillegal activity, however.

[bung]

Yes. It doesn't cover iillegal activity, however.

Uh, we're not talking about it's illegality. I'm aware that it's illegal. That's like saying we shouldn't discuss whether someone should have the right to give an advance directive to be actively euthanized under certain circumstances because it's illegal.

[saysmydoctor]

Violating the bodies of the dead
Immoral because they can't consent and it's perverted
Illegal because you violate the rights of the deceased

/discussion

If you want a conversation about necrophilia just for kicks, just admit it. But don't pretend like there's that much to discuss about the immorality/illegality of it.
I think that's what he was proposing being discussed. If the dead, prior to dying, allowed it to occur, would it be a violation of their rights?

With that being said, I think this is batshit nuts, but mostly cause I would never want to do this.

[SlappedActor]

I, for one, welcome a discussion involving this burgeoning movement. Corpse-fuckers have been marginalized by our oppressive social culture for far too long.

Bung, your ideas are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

[Piss]

what a stupid idea

[GeeBee]

I think that's what he was proposing being discussed. If the dead, prior to dying, allowed it to occur, would it be a violation of their rights?

With that being said, I think this is batshit nuts, but mostly cause I would never want to do this.

Fair enough. I suppose if I left it in my will that I wanted to be diddled after I died...who is anyone to deny my dying wishes?

Sick bastards.

[saysmydoctor]

I honestly don't understand why anyone would want that done to them...or why anyone would want to torture themselves to do that with, what I am assuming is, a dead loved one. That would just be bittersweet.

I also think it's gross, but that's a total other issue.

[mena]

What a weird, yet very interesting question. I've never thought about this.

I think my main argument against it is that it's disturbing and seems to go against society's rules and morals. But to answer your question, if a person gives consent before they die for their spouse/partner to have sex with their dead body then maybe it shouldn't be considered an illegal act. I say maybe because I'm still on the fence about this. And you have to wonder about the spouse's mental state if they decide to go through with getting it on with a dead body.

[bung]

By23GJZqA0w

[x togepi x]

if someone wants to make an argument besides "it's immoral", then they'd have a point. it's disgusting, but so is a lot of things that are currently legal. unless there's like super big health risks involved that could effect other people. i fortunately do not know enough about necrophilia to know anything about the implications of said act.

but i mean, reanimator was a good movie.

[Nevuk]

I have a friend who is very cannabilistic, and I once told him that if I died he could eat my body.

[peder458]

I have a friend who is very cannabilistic, and I once told him that if I died he could eat my body.

you have a friend who eats human flesh???

[Nevuk]

you have a friend who eats human flesh???
He fantasizes about it and writes poetry concerning it.

[Josh Weinstein]

Let's say a person signs an advance directive saying that, in the event of their death, they agree to allow their spouse to use their body for sexual gratification in any way they please, for as long as they desire. Should this be legal? Morally speaking, if one person consents that they fully support their spouse using their body in such a way after they die, would this be wrong?

What are people's thoughts on this?

Just curious... did you bring this up because you have a terminally ill girlfriend/wife that you want bone after she passes? Are you looking for approval by anonymous people in this forum to do the dirty deed with a cold, stiff corpse? I'm not suggesting this is an invalid debate, but what was your intention with bringing this up? In any case, I wish you luck in your desire to stick your wang doodle in in the flaky, crusty orifice that was your spouse's vagina.

PS - will "mung" be involved? (http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=mung)

[peder458]

He fantasizes about it and writes poetry concerning it.

i am slightly disturbed by that. to each his own i suppose...

[thefaceless]

http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a162/hachawah/necrophillia.png

[Animalhill]

i am slightly disturbed by that. to each his own i suppose...
Nah- that is really just fucked up.

[doppelganger]

lol @ thread

[peder458]

Nah- that is really just fucked up.

thanks i didn't want to be rude.

[Animalhill]

thanks i didn't want to be rude.
Fortunately, I have no moral highground ;-) . Got your back.

[GeeBee]

Fortunately, I have no moral highground ;-) . Got your back.

Last I checked, you're supposed to have around 613 areas of moral high ground, no? :-d

[Animalhill]

Last I checked, you're supposed to have around 613 areas of moral high ground, no? :-d
Hahaha a common misconception that the rule applies to dirty Jews like myself ;-)

[Alou]

It would never be allowed. There are definitely health risks involved mentally and even if there were no risks people would still find a way to make it illegal simply because everyone would go ewww.

[phil19]

im only concerened with the smell factor associated with this. Provided air freshner was employed i see no problem with this.
reminds me of the frenzal song - 60, beautiful and mine.

[MyNameIsRoss]

all morticians do this.

[peder458]

all morticians do this.

i think i want to be cremated. :)

[JuneJuly]

I don't see a problem with that. Seems like any opposition to this hypothetical would be based on "eww that's gross".

spot on. :]

because, eww that's gross.

[jenna marie]

what pychologically impaired freak would want to do it with their dead spouse?
and i agree with thehereaway, what's on your mind?
curiosity never hurts, but if this is something you're considering...


question;
can necrophilia be classified as a paraphilia/fetish?

anyway, i find this subject a little creepy, i mean, am i the only one?

[jenna marie]

all morticians do this.

all morticians sex the copses?
i find that hard to believe.
with as much evil and sickness in the world today,
call me oblivious, but i honestly don't believe we're to this point, yet.
are we?

[Rey1789]

Seriously, What Freak Thinks About This Shit!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!

[Duexy]

fuck yeah

[thehereaway]

what pychologically impaired freak would want to do it with their dead spouse?
and i agree with thehereaway, what's on your mind?
curiosity never hurts, but if this is something you're considering...


question;
can necrophilia be classified as a paraphilia/fetish?

anyway, i find this subject a little creepy, i mean, am i the only one?

A quick wikipedia search states: 'It is classified as a paraphilia by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychiatric Association.'

all morticians sex the copses?
i find that hard to believe.
with as much evil and sickness in the world today,
call me oblivious, but i honestly don't believe we're to this point, yet.
are we?

I believe that was a joke.

[Praetor]

Seriously, What Freak Thinks About This Shit!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!
You're not going to last long in this forum. Just a heads up.

[Rey1789]

You're not going to last long in this forum. Just a heads up.


yeah, I wasn't planning on coming back to this page ever again until I saw I was quoted

[Praetor]

yeah, I wasn't planning on coming back to this page ever again until I saw I was quoted
Maybe you should amend that statement to say that you're never coming back to the Politics forum in general. I'd like that.

[Rey1789]

Maybe you should amend that statement to say that you're never coming back to the Politics forum in general. I'd like that.





hate to upset but................................ ................................... .......no

[Praetor]

That's fine. I have an ignore list. It's basically the same.

[tragic_harmony]

As nasty as it seems,it isnt harming anyone.The only effect it gives is happienness to the corpse fucker.



agreed.

[jenna marie]

god damn.
chill.
can't we all just hold hands and sing 'jesus loves me'?