Iraqi Nukes?

[yeat182]

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,83821,00.html


pay special attention to the last few lines...

[xTSTLx]

while reading this, the first thing that popped in my head was, ohh yea, this is fox news......i take this with a grain of salt

[Justin_stacy]

Originally posted by xTSTLx
while reading this, the first thing that popped in my head was, ohh yea, this is fox news......i take this with a grain of salt

Thats just stupid, fox is just as good as a news agency, if not better, then the other big 6 new agencies and most news paper in america.

[evil zach]

Originally posted by yeat182
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,83821,00.html


pay special attention to the last few lines...

wh dose this always seem to happen...
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/0410-13.htm

[blaarg]

Originally posted by Justin_stacy
Thats just stupid, fox is just as good as a news agency, if not better, then the other big 6 new agencies and most news paper in america.
that's right the great practicly state run news organization of fox news, here's an interresting tidbit about how we helped get saddam where he was you might be very interrested in the 4th parograph.

https://publish.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/12/31/world/main534798.shtml

[xTSTLx]

Originally posted by evil zach
wh dose this always seem to happen...
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/0410-13.htm



man, thats funny as shit

[yeat182]

Originally posted by blaarg
that's right the great practicly state run news organization of fox news, here's an interresting tidbit about how we helped get saddam where he was you might be very interrested in the 4th parograph.

https://publish.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/12/31/world/main534798.shtml


does that article mention that France, Germany and Russia have all helped get saddam where he is today? they all contributed weapons to his regime as well at the same time the US did, and some of them still do.

[Justin_stacy]

Originally posted by blaarg
that's right the great practicly state run news organization of fox news, here's an interresting tidbit about how we helped get saddam where he was you might be very interrested in the 4th parograph.

https://publish.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/12/31/world/main534798.shtml

Frist your site doesn't work?

Second you must be one stupid human being if you think that just because FOX supports our president that they are state run. Every news agency from CNN, ABC, CBS, MSN, NBC, HEADLINE NEWS, NPS, and PBS, all supported Clinton through his regin does that mean that they were "state run" through out the clinton years, no. Grow up just because one news agency out of the 10 or so major ones out there is more conservative leaning doesn't mean its state run.

[kidinthecorner]

Originally posted by blaarg
that's right the great practicly state run news organization of fox news, here's an interresting tidbit about how we helped get saddam where he was you might be very interrested in the 4th parograph.

https://publish.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/12/31/world/main534798.shtml

Do you have any other facts anywhere? This is the only thing I've heard you talk about in the last few days, its in almost every thread. I don't think anyone is denying where they came from, its the fact that we don't know where they went when we told him to get rid of them that is of concern. Now we want to make sure he still doesnt have them, because he's not supposed to. Obviously we gave them to Saddam, that's not the point.

[yeat182]

Originally posted by xTSTLx
while reading this, the first thing that popped in my head was, ohh yea, this is fox news......i take this with a grain of salt


fine, here's one from CNN (http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/04/12/sprj.irq.chemical/index.html)

[NOFXdesendents5]

they do have chem and bio WMDs, but not nukes.

[yeat182]

Originally posted by cal1082
I like this argument because it changes nothing. If we did help them back in the 80's it was obviously a mistake for us to do that and everyother country that has and is helping Iraq. Does that make the current war wrong? No, it just means we screwed up and now we're fixing what we did wrong.

It has no bearing on the current war.


i totally agree, i've made this same point a few times before. when the people who don't support the war can't come up with any defesable positions, they simply resort to saying, "well, we gave him the weapons" as if that some how makes what we are doing wrong?