Saddam had no connection to Al Queda...Right

[BrandNewRock05]

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,85256,00.html

edit: oops! i pasted the wrong thing to begin with. here, try this. i have to run now. later

[evil zach]

what? Am I supposed to make anothe thread baout it?

[BrandNewRock05]

Originally posted by evil zach
what? Am I supposed to make anothe thread baout it?
no its just funny how everyone was saying how stupid that the thought of osama and saddam being connected was so absurd. turns out it wasnt

[evil zach]

suorces?

[BrandNewRock05]

Originally posted by evil zach
suorces?
sources of what? i just gave you a link

[evil zach]

It just brought me to the page wher one ould create a new thread

[BrandNewRock05]

oh shit, my bad. let me post again. i had no clue what you where talking about for a while there

[WithStamin]

Try the link (http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,85256,00.html ) now. It links Iraq to Al Queda. So that makes proof about chemical weapons (here (http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,85273,00.html ) )and terrorism in one day. But the was was about oil, right?

[WithStamin]

Originally posted by HateJimmyCarter
isnt that the same link as above? Yes, but BrandNew had to edit it. I don't think everyone got to read the article after it was corrected.

PS. 600th post!

[xTSTLx]

before i can have a reaction to this, i would need more info about it

[WithStamin]

What do you means more info? It's all right there.

[xTSTLx]

we dont have any info that relates saddam to 9/11, all we know is that there were meetings

[evil zach]

The documents don't mention any meeting between bin Laden and Iraqi officials.

[Matthew]

Wow. I like how the article actually contradicts the headline. Oh, Fox News. So openly biased, as though it were the Al Jazeer of the American world. Anyway, Fox News has no credibility. But for the record I refuse to listen to NPR, because it is also extremely biased.

[Safetyin#]

Originally posted by ScreamoEMOBoy
Fox News has no credibility.

Ah thats just dumb, any thing that doesn't agree with you or your views has no credibility.

[yeat182]

i remember just after 9/11 that there was a report that Atta, one of the high jackers, met with an Iraqi intelligence officer in either Germany or hungary, i dont' quite remember, a few months before the attack, but i've never heard mention of it during this whole talk about the war. does anyone else remember that?

also, i didn't read the article yet, so if it is about what i mentioned above, just ignore me.

[Safetyin#]

Originally posted by yeat182
i remember just after 9/11 that there was a report that Atta, one of the high jackers, met with an Iraqi intelligence officer in either Germany or hungary, i dont' quite remember, a few months before the attack, but i've never heard mention of it during this whole talk about the war. does anyone else remember that?

also, i didn't read the article yet, so if it is about what i mentioned above, just ignore me.

I think that happened in Prauge.

[Matthew]

Originally posted by Safetyin#
Ah thats just dumb, any thing that doesn't agree with you or your views has no credibility.

I also mentioned that I dont listen to NPR, which most liberals tout as the only legitimate news radio. Openly biased media is joke, no matter what side of the political spectrum.

[BrandNewRock05]

Originally posted by ScreamoEMOBoy
I also mentioned that I dont listen to NPR, which most liberals tout as the only legitimate news radio. Openly biased media is joke, no matter what side of the political spectrum.
so you have to deal with biased news. its impossible not too. and dont give me this "i know of a non-biased news sourse" because there is no such thing. you have to decide what you trust and look around for good news coverage that is as fair as possible. fox news, yes is biased, but seems to have all of its facts straight

[cscpunkass]

dude, thats from fox news. fox news is the most propagandist bullshit i've ever seen in my life. Osama bin laden called Saddam an infidel and has also made statements against his regime. Not a very friendly relationship there. I barely believe anything i see on the news about the war, theres a lot of filtering going on there. I have yet to see the civilian death toll on the news. I wonder why.

[yeat182]

Originally posted by cscpunkass
dude, thats from fox news. fox news is the most propagandist bullshit i've ever seen in my life. Osama bin laden called Saddam an infidel and has also made statements against his regime. Not a very friendly relationship there. I barely believe anything i see on the news about the war, theres a lot of filtering going on there. I have yet to see the civilian death toll on the news. I wonder why.

we've been over the value of fox news and others as sources of information. you're new here, but try and keep up.

[Matthew]

Originally posted by cscpunkass
Osama bin laden called Saddam an infidel and has also made statements against his regime.

Saddam ran a secular government.

Al Queada is a fundamentalist Islamic group.

It would only be logical that Al Queada would hate Saddam. I had never actually heard that they had mentioned each other before.

[yeat182]

Originally posted by ScreamoEMOBoy
Saddam ran a secular government.

Al Queada is a fundamentalist Islamic group.

It would only be logical that Al Queada would hate Saddam. I had never actually heard that they had mentioned each other before.


"the enemy of my enemy is my friend"

[Matthew]

Originally posted by yeat182
"the enemy of my enemy is my friend"

Very true. And i do believe that is the (not unsound) logic that the US govt is working on. I could see a secular saddam employing al queada, but not a fundamentalist al queada doing saddams bidding.

[yeat182]

Originally posted by ScreamoEMOBoy
Very true. And i do believe that is the (not unsound) logic that the US govt is working on. I could see a secular saddam employing al queada, but not a fundamentalist al queada doing saddams bidding.

yeah, definatly. i mean, if saddam was like, "osama, i got this nuclear weapon i'm trying to get rid of, you interested?" i'm sure osama wouldn't get all rightous and refuse any help from an "infidel". but that doesn't mean they are best buddies.

[Safetyin#]

Originally posted by ScreamoEMOBoy
Very true. And i do believe that is the (not unsound) logic that the US govt is working on. I could see a secular saddam employing al queada, but not a fundamentalist al queada doing saddams bidding.


opposing sides are known to join sides in times of conflict. USSR and allies in wwII, the Indians and the Confederates in the civil war, french and the Americans in the Revolutionary war, ect.

So there is a chance, a big one, that saddum and bin could have formed an alliance for there common goals.

[cscpunkass]

I heard a couple weeks ago they held a pro war rally at the site of the world trade center saying this war started on september 11th.. I dont know how stupid they think people are.. oh and by the way, just wondering, do pro war protestors get arrested, or just the anti-war people?

[yeat182]

Originally posted by cscpunkass
I heard a couple weeks ago they held a pro war rally at the site of the world trade center saying this war started on september 11th.. I dont know how stupid they think people are.. oh and by the way, just wondering, do pro war protestors get arrested, or just the anti-war people?

just the ones that are a threat to public saftey

[BrandNewRock05]

Originally posted by cscpunkass
I heard a couple weeks ago they held a pro war rally at the site of the world trade center saying this war started on september 11th.. I dont know how stupid they think people are.. oh and by the way, just wondering, do pro war protestors get arrested, or just the anti-war people?
just the dumbfucks, and that tends to be anti war people

[BrandNewRock05]

Originally posted by cscpunkass
dude, thats from fox news. fox news is the most propagandist bullshit i've ever seen in my life. Osama bin laden called Saddam an infidel and has also made statements against his regime. Not a very friendly relationship there. I barely believe anything i see on the news about the war, theres a lot of filtering going on there. I have yet to see the civilian death toll on the news. I wonder why.
a common enemy makes you a wartime friend

[Safetyin#]

Originally posted by cscpunkass
I heard a couple weeks ago they held a pro war rally at the site of the world trade center saying this war started on september 11th.. I dont know how stupid they think people are.. oh and by the way, just wondering, do pro war protestors get arrested, or just the anti-war people?

The only people that get arested are those that break the LAW, this just normally tends to be anti-bush.........oh i mean anti-war people, because there not really for there cause, but more out to have FUN, and it gives them an excuse to destroy public and private property, which inturn means they NEED to be put in jail.

[BrandNewRock05]

Originally posted by Safetyin#
The only people that get arested are those that break the LAW, this just normally tends to be anti-bush.........oh i mean anti-war people, because there not really for there cause, but more out to have FUN, and it gives them an excuse to destroy public and private property, which inturn means they NEED to be put in jail.
i dont know why i dont get along with you, our views are nearly identical

[cscpunkass]

Originally posted by Safetyin#
The only people that get arested are those that break the LAW, this just normally tends to be anti-bush.........oh i mean anti-war people, because there not really for there cause, but more out to have FUN, and it gives them an excuse to destroy public and private property, which inturn means they NEED to be put in jail.


what about that dude in NY who got arrested for wearing a "peace" t-shirt or whatever a few months ago i dont remember the whole story but he didnt seem to be doing anything

[BrandNewRock05]

Originally posted by cscpunkass
what about that dude in NY who got arrested for wearing a "peace" t-shirt or whatever a few months ago i dont remember the whole story but he didnt seem to be doing anything they guy in the mall? his shirt said "give peace a chance". there is nothing wrong with that. supposedly, there were complaints from costomers at the mall about the man, his shirt, and his words. because of that, the mall security asked the man to remove his shirt. when he refused, he was arrested. all is fair.

[Safetyin#]

Originally posted by cscpunkass
what about that dude in NY who got arrested for wearing a "peace" t-shirt or whatever a few months ago i dont remember the whole story but he didnt seem to be doing anything

Again there are exceptions to every point, and just because it wasn't reported, by our liberal medias, that he wasn't doing any thing you cna not know that for sure, how do you know he didn't insult the police or spit on them? (those our just examples as to why he might of gotten arrested out side of wearing the shirt.)