Lady Gaga - The Fame Monster

[Drew Beringer]

Lady Gaga – The Fame Monster
Release Date: November 23, 2009
Record Label: Interscope

Stefani Joanne Angelina Germanotta is the most polarizing musician in the mainstream right now. Better known as Lady Gaga, you either love her or hate her. The bizarre outfits, the glamorous videos, and the hypersexual live performances keep her name in the news, but it’s her infectious pop melodies that give her the relevance to not just be a flash in the pan.

The glam-pop star made her splash into the mainstream with her 2008 debut, The Fame, which went on to sell over 1.5 million copies in the United States. The Fame Monster was originally set to be released alongside a re-release of The Fame, but Lady Gaga eventually decide to release it on its own, stating that the 8 track album represents a separate concept from The Fame, specifically the dark side of fame Gaga dealt with while traveling the world. The end result, which features flawless production, left me with mixed feelings. There are some definite smashes here, but some of the songs left me wanting more of that Gaga punch.

The Fame Monster is much more provocative than its predecessor, and the first (and best) track, “Bad Romance,” is a prime example. It’s full of soul, synth, a stomp-along beat, and peculiar lyrics (I want your ugly/I want your disease). In fact, the majority of the lyrics straddle the line between wacky and absurd. “He ate my heart/he ate-ate-ate my heart out” kicks off the eerie and vocoder-heavy “Monster,” while “take a bite out of my bad-girl meat/show me your teeth” is mentioned on the off-kilter and quirky closer “Teeth.” While the lyrics may cause you to raise an eyebrow, these three tracks really stand out.

Throughout The Fame Monster, it is fairly easy to pick up on Gaga’s influences. The Latino-tinged “Alejandro” channels Shakira on the chorus and moves like an Ace of Base song. Her piano-ballad, “Speechless,” comes across as a tribute to Freddie Mercury, while “So Happy I Could Die” and “Dance in the Dark” both have the pizzazz of Madonna. Some work (“So Happy I Could Die” and the hypnotic “Dance in the Dark”), while some fall flat (the boring and out-of-place “Speechless,” and the b-side wannabe “Telephone”).

The Fame Monster definitely lives up to its title: it’s mysterious, it’s in-your-face, and it’s sexual. It is definitely not for everyone, but if you’re a major Gaga fan or find yourself in a club 5 days out of the week, it’s best you pick this up. Curious by-standers would be best served to download tracks like “Bad Romance” and “Dance In The Dark.” If you don’t fall in either of these categories, you can continue to make fun of Lady Gaga/her fans/me. But regardless of opinion, Lady Gaga continues to make passionate pop music that is better than a lot of the bands in the “scene” today (not naming names, but it rhymes with “Stobra Carship” and “Korever The Fickest Sids”). The Fame Monster is far from a perfect album, but it is another vital step in Gaga’s quest to be the next pop icon.

Track Listing:
1. Bad Romance
2. Alejandro
3. Monster
4. Speechless
5. Dance in the Dark
6. Telephone feat. Beyoncé
7. So Happy I Could Die
8. Teeth
Produced by: Fernando Garibay, RedOne, Space Cowboy, Darkchild, Teddy Riley, Ron Fair

Official Site (http://www.ladygaga.com); Official Myspace (http://www.myspace.com/ladygaga)

[gr33ndayfr3ak]

As a whole, I liked this more than The Fame.
I agree with you, telephone is awful. Great review..although Speechless was probably one of my favorites..

[gr33ndayfr3ak]

Also, I applaud you for having the guts not only to review this, but also to give it such a decent, unbiased score. I'm sure many people won't be happy with you.

[Drew Beringer]

Thanks. I like pop music, not ashamed. I am not a huge Gaga fan, but I find her persona very interesting. Gave her debut a chance, like a few songs, hate a few songs. Gave this a chance, like a few songs, hate a few songs. But there is no denying she will have an impact on pop culture for years to come.

[Chris92]

Lady Gaga continues to make passionate pop music that is better than a lot of the bands in the “scene” today (not naming names, but it rhymes with “Stobra Carship” and “Korever The Fickest Sids”).
This is fucking classic. Another gem, Drew. Dunno much about her except that she's always on MTV2 though...

[xapplexpiex]

She is my guilty pleasure.

[HelloxAlone]

My guilty pleasure as well, there's just something about her I enjoy.
Might consider checking this out, Bad Romance was something I liked..

[Tristan Needler]

She definitely has more raw talent than most acts in the scene, and almost every current pop artist.

[aradiantsunrise]

She has my respect, no lie.

[Nick Le]

(not naming names, but it rhymes with “Stobra Carship” and “Korever The Fickest Sids”)

Haha that's great. Poker Face was catchy as hell for me but I never really checked out her stuff. I just might give this a listen though. Good review.

[weworemasks]

monster > fame.

this ep rules.

[stevenisfading]

Glad you reviewed this. Nice review.
Although I disagree about Speechless, Alejandro and Telephone falling flat.
Those are part of my favorites along with Bad Romance, Dance In the Dark, and Teeth.
The ones I'm not too into are Monster & So Happy I Could Die.

[sweetforever]

All my roommates love Bad Romance

[brenByah]

I can't even give her a chance. This "Lady Gaga" persona lacks sincerity to me. It seems like shocking people and wearing ridiculous outfits takes priority over songwriting. It feels like Marilyn Manson 2.0 (not musically of course). If she was Stefani Joanne Angelina Germanotta, the brunette songstress at a keyboard I've seen in old videos I would maybe give her a shot, but "Lady Gaga" I can't. I guess I'm in the "hate her" group. I'm tired of music being dominated by absurd gimmicks.

[tyramail]

there is no shame in my love for her. i love this ep.

[tfar06]

i dont like the things she sings about or her portrayal of love. all of it revolves around sex and her imagery is very occult. her songs are overly catchy and i find it annoying.

[jay_klinkhammer]

trash

[introduction]

trash
agreed. the music and the singer.

[blinkme]

I can't even give her a chance. This "Lady Gaga" persona lacks sincerity to me. It seems like shocking people and wearing ridiculous outfits takes priority over songwriting. It feels like Marilyn Manson 2.0 (not musically of course). If she was Stefani Joanne Angelina Germanotta, the brunette songstress at a keyboard I've seen in old videos I would maybe give her a shot, but "Lady Gaga" I can't. I guess I'm in the "hate her" group. I'm tired of music being dominated by absurd gimmicks.
I couldn't take her seriously after hearing that disco stick song. Although, to be fair, she performed live on the Jonathon Ross show and managed to pull it off. For that, I'll give her some credit.

[symbiote28]

i hate her

[Domenic182]

I dig the album.

[Sarcasm]

(not naming names, but it rhymes with “Stobra Carship” and “Korever The Fickest Sids”)

hahaha nice.

Good review, I'm not personally a Gaga fan, but I do appreciate her ability to write catchy songs.

[Thug_Nasty]

I can't stand this bitch. Bad Romance, Paparazzi and Love Game about the disco stick are completely annoying, especially the intro to bad romance. "ra ra ra ra ra ra" is the most obnoxious intro on the radio right now and I rage everytime it comes on. And didn't this bitch have a penis at one point? I would love to see the day when she is no longer on the radio, or talked about, but just like Miley Cyrus, I don't think that's going to happen anytime soon and it is really aggrevating.

[brokenwings]

i'm one of the haters. incredibly annoying music and person.

[Paulb-182]

In before Eda :-)

I do love me a bit of Gaga I have to admit.

[tidalwave]

great review.

although she did release it as a re-release of The Fame. Originally it was going to be that way, then it was just going to be The Fame Monster but when it was actually released you received The Fame Monster on one disc and the other disc is The Fame plus b-sides and what not.

[miapiv89]

I can't even give her a chance. This "Lady Gaga" persona lacks sincerity to me. It seems like shocking people and wearing ridiculous outfits takes priority over songwriting. It feels like Marilyn Manson 2.0 (not musically of course). If she was Stefani Joanne Angelina Germanotta, the brunette songstress at a keyboard I've seen in old videos I would maybe give her a shot, but "Lady Gaga" I can't. I guess I'm in the "hate her" group. I'm tired of music being dominated by absurd gimmicks.
I wouldn't be surprised if she adopted the Lady Gaga gimmick because she wasn't being recognized for her talent as Stefani.

[saveferris]

I can't even give her a chance. This "Lady Gaga" persona lacks sincerity to me. It seems like shocking people and wearing ridiculous outfits takes priority over songwriting. It feels like Marilyn Manson 2.0 (not musically of course). If she was Stefani Joanne Angelina Germanotta, the brunette songstress at a keyboard I've seen in old videos I would maybe give her a shot, but "Lady Gaga" I can't. I guess I'm in the "hate her" group. I'm tired of music being dominated by absurd gimmicks.
this. I'm glad i'm not alone.

[HisExcellency]

I wouldn't be surprised if she adopted the Lady Gaga gimmick because she wasn't being recognized for her talent as Stefani.
Yeh I read this on http://www.forbes.com/2009/11/25/lady-gaga-music-business-entertainment-marketing.html the other day

"In an interview last winter, Lady Gaga recalled her anguish at being ignored as she performed at a bar filled with drunken NYU students. No one paid the slightest attention to her until, fed up, she decided to strip down to her lingerie. "I started playing in my underwear at the piano and I remember everyone was all of a sudden like 'Whoa!' And I said, 'Yeah, you're looking at me now, huh?' "

[Moira Amiss]

I wish she didn't use so much autotune and/or other effects on her voice, she has an amazing voice without it all, but i guess it makes sense for her type of music.

[Ari Christos]

If she wasn't such a gimmick I could enjoy her music. But knowing that she's probably dancing in a dress made of human hair in the video of whatever song I'm listening to is really a turn off.

[Broclee]

Let the haters hate, I love me some Gaga.

[yetconfused]

i love her. i think she's way better than a lot of acts on the scene now, gimmick or no gimmick, dick or no dick. she sings live and has a say in her music. more than i can say for a lot of people.
and she didn't need leighton meester or selena gomez to get radio play.

i do admit, though, that some of the eccentricity can die down because it does get a bit much. like the "orbit" thing she wears...it does take away from the music in some instances.

i don't know about other GaGa fans, but she doesn't need all the crazy stuff for me to like her. just the music, and the love for her fans.

[Xianmusicfan]

It's sad how many people on here like her, she's terrible.

[i2ockbotm]

I'm happy to see AP review this album. The scores are spot-on. I'd go higher on lasting value personally because this music is so different than everything else I listen to, it will serve as a good piece to break the monotony. Bad Romance and Monster are up there with my favorite tracks of the year

[live.]

She's a business genius. Everything James Montgommery wrote about Soulja Boy can be said about GaGa.

[demondays524]

Great review. Lady Gaga is one of the few pop artists I actually enjoy. "Bad Romance" is such a great song.

[Andrew33]

Enjoy Poker Face. The rest, not so much.

[iheartmusic043]

I think people are too distracted by her crazy antics to see that see is truly talented. This girl has a major voice. I love that she is ballsy but I think people need to listen to her acoustic performances. Like when she performed Bad Romance on Saturday Night Live, she sounded amazing.

[arson]

I can't even give her a chance. This "Lady Gaga" persona lacks sincerity to me. It seems like shocking people and wearing ridiculous outfits takes priority over songwriting. It feels like Marilyn Manson 2.0 (not musically of course). If she was Stefani Joanne Angelina Germanotta, the brunette songstress at a keyboard I've seen in old videos I would maybe give her a shot, but "Lady Gaga" I can't. I guess I'm in the "hate her" group. I'm tired of music being dominated by absurd gimmicks.
This is kind of how I feel. I honestly don't think anything about her is innovative. She just seems like a bad version of what's already been done. But that's just my opinion.

[PoweredbyPJ]

Anyone who truly thinks she has no talent whatsoever doesn't know what they're talking about.

Aside from the fact that some of the music she makes is flat out good, I appreciate her message too :)

[mena]

I actually really like Telephone. It's probably my favorite song off of the album.

[brenByah]

The persona is kind of what sets her apart, though. There are so many pop artists doing the same thing these days and they all kind of run together. Her persona is completely a part of her art - she has complete creative control over it (and everything else she does) and yeah, it's pretty weird but you definitely know who Lady Gaga is. I think it's interesting.
When the persona comes off as such an artificial thing, I can't take the songwriting seriously either, as it's all part of the character too. None of it seems authentic to me. That's just my opinion :shrug:

[ThrownAwayKyle]

i liked Speechless, definitely one of her most unique songs and it stands out having some actual real instruments.

[cacophonous]

When the persona comes off as such an artificial thing, I can't take the songwriting seriously either, as it's all part of the character too. None of it seems authentic to me. That's just my opinion :shrug:
How do you define authentic, though? I'd argue that pretty much all artists in the music industry have a persona, particularly in rock and rap music. It's always been a huge part of the music industry, from Lady Gaga all the way back to the Beatles, and before that, too.

[brenByah]

How do you define authentic, though? I'd argue that pretty much all artists in the music industry have a persona, particularly in rock and rap music. It's always been a huge part of the music industry, from Lady Gaga all the way back to the Beatles, and before that, too.
Paul McCartney, is Paul McCartney. John Lennon was John Lennon. Their music is timeless because of the songs themselves, it was honest songwriting, if we look away from the artists and look just at the songs Gaga clearly can't stand up (her lyrics are generic pop garbage). It just seems to me she wasn't making it as Stefani, and decided to do what she thought she had to do to reach success. Wear ridiculous outfits, plan obscure live performances and claim it's all art. I'm not buying it, it all just seems like one act. I don't think artists should have the mentality of "how can I shock them next" when their main concern should be writing music with real emotion (which I don't feel that she does).

[cacophonous]

Paul McCartney, is Paul McCartney. John Lennon was John Lennon.

Wait, what? So how do you explain the matching outfits and haircuts of their early years? How do you explain Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band? They absolutely had their own personas. I still don't know how you can define what is "honest" songwriting and what isn't (or what that even means). It sounds more like a matter of you disliking the music, which is fine, but I don't see how you can write off someone for having a "persona," when, like I said, personas are and always have been a part of the music industry. We don't know musicians as people. We know them as they appear in songs. We know them in the way they market themselves to us, and even if that persona is very similar to the person behind it, it's still a persona, it's an image created from the art, period.

[Young Machetes]

Wait, what? So how do you explain the matching outfits and haircuts of their early years? How do you explain Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band? They absolutely had their own personas. I still don't know how you can define what is "honest" songwriting and what isn't (or what that even means). It sounds more like a matter of you disliking the music, which is fine, but I don't see how you can write off someone for having a "persona," when, like I said, personas are and always have been a part of the music industry. We don't know musicians as people. We know them as they appear in songs. We know them in the way they market themselves to us, and even if that persona is very similar to the person behind it, it's still a persona, it's an image created from the art, period.
Very well summed up.

Love her or hate her, she dresses the way she does, and acts the way she does on stage because she wants to give her fans a SHOW. She's one of the few musicians these days that puts on a complete show, not just the music. For those who say she can't sing, when was the last time you've seen a female musician dance and still be able to belt out the lyrics like she does. She'll be around for many years to come, and will only piss off her haters even more. I love to see people hate on her, it only makes her more and more popular.

[brenByah]

Wait, what? So how do you explain the matching outfits and haircuts of their early years? How do you explain Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band? They absolutely had their own personas. I still don't know how you can define what is "honest" songwriting and what isn't (or what that even means). It sounds more like a matter of you disliking the music, which is fine, but I don't see how you can write off someone for having a "persona," when, like I said, personas are and always have been a part of the music industry. We don't know musicians as people. We know them as they appear in songs. We know them in the way they market themselves to us, and even if that persona is very similar to the person behind it, it's still a persona, it's an image created from the art, period.

The Beatles didn't use stage names, and being clean shaven and wearing matching suits is far far different than wearing a garbage bag (does she even own pants?). I like songs that I can form a real connection to that reveal some real emotion from the artist. I seems like Gaga is more concerned about shocking clothing choices or weird stage performances, it's nothing new. She's doing what Alice Cooper and Marilyn Manson have done before her. Frankly, the Beatles shouldn't be mentioned in the same breath as Gaga, in any sense. If you don't understand what I mean by honest songwriting, I'll just clarify what I mean. I think her songs (lyrics in particular) are incredibly shallow and very weak, but that's what I expect from commercial radio. I think her antics seem to be more of her act than the music itself, which is why I don't care for her act, and don't consider it to be anything more than an act.

[thebelljar]

people who're going on about her not being "authentic" don't get it. she deliberately created her persona to get people's attention, to get people to take notice, to sell herself a bit and she's unabashed about that. i mean, like. aren't tons of her songs about wanting to be famous? personally i kind of like that she does all she can to get publicity and maintain her own image. i think it's less annoying than the celebrities that claim to hate all the attention and the cameras.

so she makes use of performance art, and she's not the first one to do it. um, ok. so? if you don't like her music, then, whatever--but they're dance tunes. good dance tunes. they don't try to be anything more complicated than that, and i don't see the point in whining about them.

i only like a few of her songs and haven't listened to the fame monster, but i do respect her.

[cacophonous]

The Beatles didn't use stage names, and being clean shaven and wearing matching suits is far far different than wearing a garbage bag (does she even own pants?). I like songs that I can form a real connection to that reveal some real emotion from the artist. I seems like Gaga is more concerned about shocking clothing choices or weird stage performances, it's nothing new. She's doing what Alice Cooper and Marilyn Manson have done before her. Frankly, the Beatles shouldn't be mentioned in the same breath as Gaga, in any sense. If you don't understand what I mean by honest songwriting, I'll just clarify what I mean. I think her songs (lyrics in particular) are incredibly shallow and very weak, but that's what I expect from commercial radio. I think her antics seem to be more of her act than the music itself, which is why I don't care for her act, and don't consider it to be anything more than an act.
Ringo Starr is not Ringo Starr's real name. Neither is Billy Shears.

Like I said, you don't like her music and that's fine--I'm not trying to say she's the next John Lennon. But the idea that a stage name and an accompanying persona are reasons to write off musicians is bogus to me, and it would discount many, many great and influential artists.

[ZEZEtheX]

I can't even give her a chance. This "Lady Gaga" persona lacks sincerity to me. It seems like shocking people and wearing ridiculous outfits takes priority over songwriting. It feels like Marilyn Manson 2.0 (not musically of course). If she was Stefani Joanne Angelina Germanotta, the brunette songstress at a keyboard I've seen in old videos I would maybe give her a shot, but "Lady Gaga" I can't. I guess I'm in the "hate her" group. I'm tired of music being dominated by absurd gimmicks.
Was just about to post something similar but not as elaborate. I'm with you.

[FBTMOPenguins]

Lady Gaga is part of the problem with music today, not the solution.

[NervousDestiny]

I love this album, Gaga is very talented at what she does. I think the people that are writing her off as a shallow pop star are judging her very quickly though. If you've ever heard Gaga talk about what her songs are about in interviews you'll see there is a lot more going on in the lyrics then you would think. The girl knows what she's doing.

[SLoT]

I dig this album. That's pretty much all I have to say about it. I dig it a lot.

[*crying stars*]

Good review, Drew.

"Teeth" is a great closer.

[chcougar1]

Lady Gaga is part of the problem with music today, not the solution.
Even if her act is a gimmick at least she actually has talent.

[BozzBlonde]

Really happy you reviewed this. Awesome review as always.

[BozzBlonde]

Lady Gaga is part of the problem with music today, not the solution.
Are you kidding me? She's like modern day Madonna.

[deezee]

I love everything she does...

[Dedsexi]

Lady Gaga is part of the problem with music today, not the solution.

I agree, I find it almost disgusting that there have been albums that are alot better then anything she can ever do that have been rated lower on this site.

Lady Gaga is nothing but a slut reciting very repitive and meaningless lyrics that are painfully bad, how the fuck did this get a 69% i guess that kind of number only adds to her slutiness though.

[rmenteer14]

Even if her act is a gimmick at least she actually has talent.
agreed. which is something that sadly isn't a requirement in music these days.

[brenByah]

Ringo Starr is not Ringo Starr's real name. Neither is Billy Shears.

Like I said, you don't like her music and that's fine--I'm not trying to say she's the next John Lennon. But the idea that a stage name and an accompanying persona are reasons to write off musicians is bogus to me, and it would discount many, many great and influential artists.
I feel like image has greatly overshadowed the importance of the music itself when it comes to much of the music world. I think it's one of if not the biggest problem in music today, and I feel like Lady Gaga emobodies that very problem.

[Broclee]

It's sad how many people on here like her, she's terrible.

except not. She has a lot of talent and a great mind for pop music.

It's one thing to not enjoy her, but to blindly say she's "terrible" is just plain stupid.

[cacophonous]

I feel like image has greatly overshadowed the importance of the music itself when it comes to much of the music world. I think it's one of if not the biggest problem in music today, and I feel like Lady Gaga emobodies that very problem.
I'm of the opinion that image has always been a huge part of music, for better or worse. I mean, look at how many people own Ramones t-shirts (you know the one) but not the actual album.

As far as Lady Gaga goes, to each his own. When it comes to the "depth" or "honesty" of music, it's all going to be subjective, not to mention the fact that not everyone is going to use those qualities to determine whether or not music is good. But I think she's just what the mainstream music industry needs: a pop diva who writes her own songs, isn't afraid to experiment, and puts on a show wherever she goes.

[Broclee]

I'm of the opinion that image has always been a huge part of music, for better or worse. I mean, look at how many people own Ramones t-shirts (you know the one) but not the actual album.

As far as Lady Gaga goes, to each his own. When it comes to the "depth" or "honesty" of music, it's all going to be subjective, not to mention the fact that not everyone is going to use those qualities to determine whether or not music is good. But I think she's just what the mainstream music industry needs: a pop diva who writes her own songs, isn't afraid to experiment, and puts on a show wherever she goes.
I think this is the most right thing that's been posted about this woman on this website, good or bad.

[makeoutmags]

I don't like anything about her. I don't find her persona sincere or her performance, music to be all that interesting. To me, it's just a shtick and not a particularly innovative or creative one. I like and can appreciate certain "popular" artists, but not Lady Gaga.

[Danny Schme]

I'm of the opinion that image has always been a huge part of music, for better or worse. I mean, look at how many people own Ramones t-shirts (you know the one) but not the actual album.

As far as Lady Gaga goes, to each his own. When it comes to the "depth" or "honesty" of music, it's all going to be subjective, not to mention the fact that not everyone is going to use those qualities to determine whether or not music is good. But I think she's just what the mainstream music industry needs: a pop diva who writes her own songs, isn't afraid to experiment, and puts on a show wherever she goes.
This sums up what I feel about GaGa as well.

Personally I really enjoy the The Fame Monster and disagree on one or so things from the review. I completely agree about Teeth, after numerous listens to this song, I'm still confused on how it "fits" on the record. This isn't to say Bad Romance, Alejandro and So Happy I Could Die all fit in a row, but just an overall feel. I will say that regardless of how much I enjoy Telephone, it does not feel in place either. It's fairly straight forward compared to most of the "abstract" pop tracks on the album

[makeoutmags]

I can't even give her a chance. This "Lady Gaga" persona lacks sincerity to me. It seems like shocking people and wearing ridiculous outfits takes priority over songwriting. It feels like Marilyn Manson 2.0 (not musically of course). If she was Stefani Joanne Angelina Germanotta, the brunette songstress at a keyboard I've seen in old videos I would maybe give her a shot, but "Lady Gaga" I can't. I guess I'm in the "hate her" group. I'm tired of music being dominated by absurd gimmicks.
I couldn't agree more.

[Bostancic25]

I'm not a huge fan of her, but she has a decent voice behind all of the auto-tuning.

[brenByah]

I'm of the opinion that image has always been a huge part of music, for better or worse. I mean, look at how many people own Ramones t-shirts (you know the one) but not the actual album.

As far as Lady Gaga goes, to each his own. When it comes to the "depth" or "honesty" of music, it's all going to be subjective, not to mention the fact that not everyone is going to use those qualities to determine whether or not music is good. But I think she's just what the mainstream music industry needs: a pop diva who writes her own songs, isn't afraid to experiment, and puts on a show wherever she goes.
Sure she has musical talent and it's nice that she actually writes her own lyrics, but honestly from what I've heard/seen of her lyrics don't seem to have any more depth than Britney Spears, Miley Cyrus or any other pop diva. Sure plenty of bands have image, but the outfits of the Ramones and Beatles aren't comparable. They weren't out trying to get attention because of zany outfits. They captured audiences with music, and that was their intent. It appears to me that Gaga's antics take priority over the songs themselves. The importance of her image is far more extreme than that of the other comparisons you've made.

To sum it up, image was never the focal point of The Beatles or The Ramones, it was the music. When it comes to Gaga, it seems like the persona of Lady Gaga, the wardrobe and the flashy stage shows are the focal point, not the music. That's what I dislike.

[Broclee]

Sure she has musical talent and it's nice that she actually writes her own lyrics, but honestly from what I've heard/seen of her lyrics don't seem to have any more depth than Britney Spears, Miley Cyrus or any other pop diva. Sure plenty of bands have image, but the outfits of the Ramones and Beatles aren't comparable. They weren't out trying to get attention because of zany outfits. They captured audiences with music, and that was their intent. It appears to me that Gaga's antics take priority over the songs themselves. The importance of her image is far more extreme than that of the other comparisons you've made.

To sum it up, image was never the focal point of The Beatles or The Ramones, it was the music. When it comes to Gaga, it seems like the persona of Lady Gaga, the wardrobe and the flashy stage shows are the focal point, not the music. That's what I dislike.
I think, to be fair, it could be argued that, in the beginning, image was EVERYTHING for the Beatles. They started out as grungy looking kids who cleaned up in order to get their music noticed. It wasn't until they were being respected as musicians and really came into their own musically that they threw the big concern with image into the wind.

Who's to say that Gaga won't follow a similar path?

But that's just my opinion, and I think that, given the style of music, yours is quite respectable.

[HelpMeSleep]

I love her and I love this album. first one in awhile I've actually gone out and picked up on the release day because I loved the leak so much.

[brenByah]

I think, to be fair, it could be argued that, in the beginning, image was EVERYTHING for the Beatles. They started out as grungy looking kids who cleaned up in order to get their music noticed. It wasn't until they were being respected as musicians and really came into their own musically that they threw the big concern with image into the wind.

Who's to say that Gaga won't follow a similar path?

But that's just my opinion, and I think that, given the style of music, yours is quite respectable.
If people enjoy her music that's fine, I'm not against that. I'm only putting in my two cents about what I see from her. I saw old videos of her performing as Stefani at a piano and thought she had a lot of talent, I think the way she performs now dilutes the talented artist she is, but that's just me.

[steveC]

her lyrics and videos make me uncomfortable, but damn can she (and/or whoever writes with/for her) write a good hook and I totally back what she stands for, especially as far as her involvement/pledge to the gay/lesbian/bisexual/transgender community. i think she's exactly what we need nowadays. don't own her stuff but wouldn't think to change stations if it came on the radio. really good interview on the fuse on the record with special. pretty intelligent. i love that she sees herself as more of an artist than a musician. seems to be really intelligent

[steveC]

If people enjoy her music that's fine, I'm not against that. I'm only putting in my two cents about what I see from her. I saw old videos of her performing as Stefani at a piano and thought she had a lot of talent, I think the way she performs now dilutes the talented artist she is, but that's just me.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SagYW3-KNyc

after i saw your post i looked it up on youtube. she was phenomenal, i completely agree with you. i wish she could release both what she does now and the old stuff. regardless, i wish her lyrics were better.

sorry for the double post

[FBTMOPenguins]

Are you kidding me? She's like modern day Madonna.

That is major hyperbole Madonna is amongst the upper echelon of pop music greats. To place Lady Gaga on this level two records into her career is completely flawed. Not to mention Madonna was making hits (some with much substance i.e. Like a Prayer) before auto tune was an industry standard as a "vocal effect."

[Broclee]

If Gaga can release an album in the vein of how she used to perform, I think she gain a lot more respect.

[brenByah]

If Gaga can release an album in the vein of how she used to perform, I think she gain a lot more respect.
I will admit she very likely would with me.

[i2ockbotm]

She's not going to sell tens of millions of downloads simply recording piano ballads though. You guys should check out the track "Speechless". It displays the piano and vocal talent Gaga has which might not be apparent at first listen to the dance tracks

[Broclee]

She's not going to sell tens of millions of downloads simply recording piano ballads though. You guys should check out the track "Speechless". It displays the piano and vocal talent Gaga has which might not be apparent at first listen to the dance tracks
Yes, I know the track "Speechless." I'm a fan of Gaga's. I'm just observing that, once she hits her stride, releasing an album of stripped-down, more emotional piano stuff would be a smart move, I think. Her already-fans will eat it up because it's her, and she just might gain some fans out of people who before thought she was a shock-performance, talentless pop act.

[LessThan3]

Bad Romance really is the only WOW song on this album, really...

[topher465]

I'm not behind what she stands for.

[Xianmusicfan]

except not. She has a lot of talent and a great mind for pop music.

It's one thing to not enjoy her, but to blindly say she's "terrible" is just plain stupid.
So tell me, what has she done to prove she's talented? Worn extremely excessive/over-the-top outfits? Check. Followed in Britney and Christina's footsteps? Check. I have yet to see anything (besides the crazy outfits) that separates her from her pop-star predecessors.

[Broclee]

So tell me, what has she done to prove she's talented? Worn extremely excessive/over-the-top outfits? Check. Followed in Britney and Christina's footsteps? Check. I have yet to see anything (besides the crazy outfits) that separates her from her pop-star predecessors.
7CUYvWTd6oA

gY9GzCN74SA

x_L3Upp6Ptc

The video isn't on that one, but it's the audio taken from her SNL performance.

Does this count as proof enough for you?

For Christ's sake, she was accepted at Julliard at age 11.

[omghityler]

bi5LYeajC_8

I_mqtPLDJeU

[i2ockbotm]

Not to mention she has written material for Britney. So she's not so much following in her footsteps as much as helping her plant them

[HometownHero]

This rules much harder then what was given

[Xianmusicfan]

For Christ's sake, she was accepted at Julliard at age 11.
Hmm I didn't know that, not that anyone would based on the garbage played on the radio. She can play piano, I'll give you that.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SagYW3-KNyc

See that's actually not half bad, why is she making crap like Poker Face and Love Game?

[cacophonous]

Sure she has musical talent and it's nice that she actually writes her own lyrics, but honestly from what I've heard/seen of her lyrics don't seem to have any more depth than Britney Spears, Miley Cyrus or any other pop diva. Sure plenty of bands have image, but the outfits of the Ramones and Beatles aren't comparable. They weren't out trying to get attention because of zany outfits. They captured audiences with music, and that was their intent. It appears to me that Gaga's antics take priority over the songs themselves. The importance of her image is far more extreme than that of the other comparisons you've made.

To sum it up, image was never the focal point of The Beatles or The Ramones, it was the music. When it comes to Gaga, it seems like the persona of Lady Gaga, the wardrobe and the flashy stage shows are the focal point, not the music. That's what I dislike.

The Beatles' looks had a lot to do with their early success. There are thousands of screaming girls from the '60s you can ask.

And again, you're using this word "depth" as though it has some inherent meaning. What are some musicians you think have immense depth in their music? I guarantee you that not everyone will agree, and some will strongly disagree. Regarding "depth" in lyrics--Would you like to tell me about the depth of the song "I Want to Hold Your Hand"? How is that any "deeper" than "Poker Face"? You say I have no basis for comparison when it comes to the Beatles, and yet they wrote very straightforward pop songs in their early years. The fact is, Lady Gaga could certainly garner attention with her image, and she has. But she couldn't keep people interested unless there was appealing music behind it, and there is. Her ultimate accomplishments and effect on the music world remain to be seen, obviously, but yeah. I don't think your perception of a lack of depth means the music isn't "important."

[Analog Rebellion]

It's a shame that her talent is overshadowed by her persona.

[JunkBondTrader]

shes incredible. bad romacne is proof of her talent as an artist. that song is jsut unreal, and video takes it to a whole nother level. love her, love the ep. telephone is a shit song though. january 14th cant wait to see her.

[brenByah]

The Beatles' looks had a lot to do with their early success. There are thousands of screaming girls from the '60s you can ask.

And again, you're using this word "depth" as though it has some inherent meaning. What are some musicians you think have immense depth in their music? I guarantee you that not everyone will agree, and some will strongly disagree. Regarding "depth" in lyrics--Would you like to tell me about the depth of the song "I Want to Hold Your Hand"? How is that any "deeper" than "Poker Face"? You say I have no basis for comparison when it comes to the Beatles, and yet they wrote very straightforward pop songs in their early years. The fact is, Lady Gaga could certainly garner attention with her image, and she has. But she couldn't keep people interested unless there was appealing music behind it, and there is. Her ultimate accomplishments and effect on the music world remain to be seen, obviously, but yeah. I don't think your perception of a lack of depth means the music isn't "important."
You act as though I'm stating my opinion as fact, which I'm not, nor did I say everyone must agree with me. Again you continue using the Beatles comparison, a group I never brought up. I think Gaga's all one big act, and I stand by that. I also think her lyrics are complete garbage, I stand by that as well, and yes, although I don't think the song is anywhere near the Beatles best work lyrically, I think "I Want to Hold Your Hand" is lyrically superior to "P-p-p-poker face, p-p-poker face, mum mum mum mah, P-p-p poker face, p-p-p poker face, mum mum mum mah."

[brenByah]

It's a shame that her talent is overshadowed by her persona.
thank you.

[Javs]

I really love lady gaga. She's a great entertainer, and knows how to write great hooks. The fact that she was a producer before and writes a lot of her own music is enough to see that she's extremely fucking talented, and it kind of makes me not hate all the auto-tune she uses. She has such a powerful voice too, her piano/vocal songs are just amazing.




But I will say, teeth is a horrible song. I love even the floppy lady gaga songs, but this song just made me want to throw up.

[Javs]

I don't like anything about her. I don't find her persona sincere or her performance, music to be all that interesting. To me, it's just a shtick and not a particularly innovative or creative one. I like and can appreciate certain "popular" artists, but not Lady Gaga.
Did you see her VMA performance? If you havn't, watch it.

[Co and Ca]

mmmmmtheassofladygagammmmm

[Javs]

Her voice is fucking outrageous in this performance. I don't get how anyone can say she doesn't have talent.
-0zhQ9Zol9U&feature=player_embedded

[beatpoet]

You say I have no basis for comparison when it comes to the Beatles, and yet they wrote very straightforward pop songs in their early years.

The Beatles didn't write their songs in the early years, and Lady Gaga does (mostly). she's got a 1-up there.

You act as though I'm stating my opinion as fact, which I'm not, nor did I say everyone must agree with me. Again you continue using the Beatles comparison, a group I never brought up. I think Gaga's all one big act, and I stand by that. I also think her lyrics are complete garbage, I stand by that as well, and yes, although I don't think the song is anywhere near the Beatles best work lyrically, I think "I Want to Hold Your Hand" is lyrically superior to "P-p-p-poker face, p-p-poker face, mum mum mum mah, P-p-p poker face, p-p-p poker face, mum mum mum mah."

dude, shut up. what business does she work in again? oh that's right, the "ENTERTAINMENT" business.

she's an entertainer. not a musician. not a songwriter. not a singer.

case closed.

[Dedsexi]

The Beatles didn't write their songs in the early years, and Lady Gaga does (mostly). she's got a 1-up there.



dude, shut up. what business does she work in again? oh that's right, the "ENTERTAINMENT" business.

she's an entertainer. not a musician. not a songwriter. not a singer.

case closed.

I guess you could call being a whore an entertainer, I bet she shoots ping pong balls like no other......or basketballs.....i seriously wouldnt be surprised....thats ofcourse if its wang didnt get in the way.

[Ron57]

I can't listen to sexual music from a girl with a penis.

[brenByah]

The Beatles didn't write their songs in the early years, and Lady Gaga does (mostly). she's got a 1-up there.



dude, shut up. what business does she work in again? oh that's right, the "ENTERTAINMENT" business.

she's an entertainer. not a musician. not a songwriter. not a singer.

case closed.
No, she certainly is a songwriter, singer, and musician why would you say otherwise?

[Analog Rebellion]

Her voice is fucking outrageous in this performance. I don't get how anyone can say she doesn't have talent.
-0zhQ9Zol9U&feature=player_embedded
The piano part was great, except for the parts where she sounded like she should have been singing on Broadway. Everything after the piano part was horrible. I'm so glad that I have never heard any of these songs.

[brenByah]

The piano part was great, except for the parts where she sounded like she should have been singing on Broadway. Everything after the piano part was horrible. I'm so glad that I have never heard any of these songs.
My exact thoughts, I think her persona just lets her talent go to waste.

[Dm!tr! the !st]

I wouldn't be surprised if she adopted the Lady Gaga gimmick because she wasn't being recognized for her talent as Stefani.
The name she had from the beginning befroe anyone even knew who she was. Actually, I can't see this as a gimmick becasue she was always wild like she is now, even before people knew who she was. I saw her about 2-3years ago and thought "What the F*ck is this b*tch on" but after I heard her album I gave it to her, she is a artist in her own right.

Anyways, I personally respect the fact she write adn co-writes her own songs, but i don't like most of these are centered more on her ideal of love. I mean I repect that this is her perspective of MONSTER everything, but I just don't care for some of the lyrics. I love "Teeth" though. Favorite track by her, sounds like somethnig maybe M.I.A. would make.

[Cuddleworthy]

She's one of the few musicians these days that puts on a complete show, not just the music.

Exactly. She's even said it's not just about the music, but meshing the music with fashion, art, theater, etc. to produce a complete performance.

[Cuddleworthy]

and if you think she can't sing:

NM51qOpwcIM

[tidalwave]

the fighting in this thread is ridiculous aha. no one is denying she can sing. i just got back from her concert and it was phenomenal.

but i can understand some peoples dislike for her. it's an acquired taste, as is everything. Madonna dealt with all this hate and what not as well, if Lady Gaga wants to be around as long as Madonna I certainly think she can and will.

[ZeoVGM]

7CUYvWTd6oA

gY9GzCN74SA

x_L3Upp6Ptc

The video isn't on that one, but it's the audio taken from her SNL performance.

Does this count as proof enough for you?

For Christ's sake, she was accepted at Julliard at age 11.

Now I'm just confused. Tate told me I was wrong to think that she has talent and that she's one of the best pop acts out right now. Yet these videos tell me differently!

Really though, great EP. Haven't been able to stop listening. I'm really excited to see what she does with her second album.

This is a great performance too:

VRILEQhJqoo

[Broclee]

the fighting in this thread is ridiculous aha. no one is denying she can sing. i just got back from her concert and it was phenomenal.

but i can understand some peoples dislike for her. it's an acquired taste, as is everything. Madonna dealt with all this hate and what not as well, if Lady Gaga wants to be around as long as Madonna I certainly think she can and will.

Actually, there are some people that are/were.

[tidalwave]

Actually, there are some people that are/were.
I suppose I didn't read enough of the thread then lol.
If you can't see that she does have the ability to sing, and to do so well, than you're an idiot.

[Sasha Fierce]

I love how Lady GaGa seems down to earth in interviews. Her theatrics really appear to be her rebellion from being treated poorly by her peers during adolescence. She just wants to embrace how she was always considered a "freak" and now is capitalizing on it. Her songs are catchy whether you like them or not which makes them perfect for the radio. She has a lot of talent as both a singer and writer. She is clearly a true artist. My favorite songs were Bad Romance (because it exemplifies her), Speechless (which was written to her father to beg him to get the heart surgery he needed), and Telephone (because I love Beyonce and thought it brilliant to pair Beyonce and GaGa.) Love her or hate her, she has risen to the top of all the charts really quickly and should be credited for it.

[jerrica[:]

indeed, this album is amazing, but i do have to say The Fame was better... but i'm in love with Bad Romance.
rah-rah-ah-ah-ah-ah[[:

[foleyfrosh14]

the fact that you said "alejandro" moves like an ace of base song makes your review a 5 star one, thats exactly what i thought first time i heard it haha

[lauren1234]

I just bought this on itunes and am very pleased. I love me some Gaga.

[Jordan0123]

I can't believe you wasted your time in not only listening to her crap that she calls music, and reviewing it, but slagging off Cobra Starship. You should be ashamed.

[DcS]

and if you think she can't sing:

NM51qOpwcIM
Man do I wish she would just do this inbetween Gaga albums.

[Scrawns]

so i hopped over to her myspace to listen to this new song of hers.

ear splittingly awful is how i would describe this music.

[crushxcrushx3]

69%? that's IT? wow...
all of those songs are practically flawless.

[shes.a.ghost]

I was on the fence with her until I heard Bad Romance. At first I thought it was annoying, but I like it now. I keep noticing that she is being compared to Marilyn Manson. In my opinion, I view her more like Missy Elliot. Her music's subject matter is sexual, but most adult pop star's music is. I think she is doing a great job of setting herself apart from her counterparts. Good for her.

P.S. On Ellen I noticed she thanked God for her success. I was thoroughly surprised.

[brenByah]

and if you think she can't sing:

NM51qOpwcIM
If this is what she was doing, I could be a fan, but all the ridiculous outfits and crazy performances iritate me. I think it's a shame really, the Lady Gaga persona overshadow's her real talent. In this video her voice, music, and lyrics all sound superior to what she's now doing.

[boxingwithstars]

i think 69% is too low for this. even though the songs might not be as radio smash worthy as the singles on The Fame, i think overall they are better. i was never a huge fan of her until hearing this because i thought The Fame was kind of boring aside from all the singles and "Beautiful, Dirty, Rich." every song on this release is catchy as hell, i can't stop listening to it.

Sure she has musical talent and it's nice that she actually writes her own lyrics, but honestly from what I've heard/seen of her lyrics don't seem to have any more depth than Britney Spears, Miley Cyrus or any other pop diva. Sure plenty of bands have image, but the outfits of the Ramones and Beatles aren't comparable. They weren't out trying to get attention because of zany outfits. They captured audiences with music, and that was their intent. It appears to me that Gaga's antics take priority over the songs themselves. The importance of her image is far more extreme than that of the other comparisons you've made.

To sum it up, image was never the focal point of The Beatles or The Ramones, it was the music. When it comes to Gaga, it seems like the persona of Lady Gaga, the wardrobe and the flashy stage shows are the focal point, not the music. That's what I dislike.

it's really not fair to compare her to artists like Britney and Miley. maybe she isn't an amazing lyricist, but she does not deserve to be lumped together in a category with manufactured pop stars who can't write, perform, play an instrument, or sing live. at least she's built this name for herself instead of having someone else do it for her.

and image has meant something to a lot of artists... David Bowie, Freddie Mercury, Elton John, Madonna... they all centered their music around theatrical images and stage performances. for some people, that's all they have. but it wasn't for those artists and since Gaga has shown that she actually has some raw talent i don't think it will be for her either.

[LastDeclaration]

LoveGame annoys the crap out of me.

[googley]

i hate lady gaga

[Broclee]

i hate lady gaga
fuck yah up da punx brutha!

[Lueda Alia]

Disliking her music is fine, it's not for everyone. But to say that she has no talent is 100% wrong.

Anyway, "Speechless" is easily the best track she has ever written. It's not catchy, but it's beautiful and it really shows her talent.

[BozzBlonde]

That is major hyperbole Madonna is amongst the upper echelon of pop music greats. To place Lady Gaga on this level two records into her career is completely flawed. Not to mention Madonna was making hits (some with much substance i.e. Like a Prayer) before auto tune was an industry standard as a "vocal effect."
I'm just saying I can see her reach that level.
Plus, Lady Gaga has the talent to sing without auto-tune.

[UnderMyDreams]

This is fucking classic. Another gem, Drew. Dunno much about her except that she's always on MTV2 though...
hahaha that line is funny.

[kevinAIWW]

She is my guilty pleasure.
Me too.

[kevinAIWW]

Any video of her just sitting behind a piano and singing one of her songs is beautiful. Youtube a piano version of Poker Face.

[kevinAIWW]

I was on the fence with her until I heard Bad Romance. At first I thought it was annoying, but I like it now. I keep noticing that she is being compared to Marilyn Manson. In my opinion, I view her more like Missy Elliot. Her music's subject matter is sexual, but most adult pop star's music is. I think she is doing a great job of setting herself apart from her counterparts. Good for her.

P.S. On Ellen I noticed she thanked God for her success. I was thoroughly surprised.
Missy Elliot? I was feeling a Madonna influence.

[andihines]

you know youhate her but her music is fintastic

[Argentine]

The "style over substance" title can't seem to escape her.. (sigh)
shame. this is better than her debut..

[Blaise&Panthia.]

I can't believe you wasted your time in not only listening to her crap that she calls music, and reviewing it, but slagging off Cobra Starship. You should be ashamed.
Oh dear Jordan. You should be ashamed.

[mper]

i dont have a problem with her or anything, in fact i have a lot of her songs, but i'm just not sure that a website like ap should be reviewing a straight up pop cd. dont get me wrong it was a great review, but i wouldnt put the fame monster in the same categories as the other albums reviewed here

[Broclee]

i dont have a problem with her or anything, in fact i have a lot of her songs, but i'm just not sure that a website like ap should be reviewing a straight up pop cd. dont get me wrong it was a great review, but i wouldnt put the fame monster in the same categories as the other albums reviewed here
THIS ISNT PUNX

[Enoch Ching]

I actually thoroughly enjoyed Cobra Starship...a lot more fun listening to them than Fall out boy or All american Rejects. To be honest they aren't even in the same 'scene' as Lady Gaga. Both sound completely nonidentical and go for different atmospheres.

[sargentlgfuad]

like her as a person and have a lot of respect. but, honestly, this album is terrible. i can't see any other song (possibly "Dance in the Dark") being a legit single. and i didn't think her voice stood out at all, like what i thought it would at least, from hearing her singles first. and the lyrics are brokencyde bad, sorry, but they are.

[sargentlgfuad]

I actually thoroughly enjoyed Cobra Starship...a lot more fun listening to them than Fall out boy or All american Rejects. To be honest they aren't even in the same 'scene' as Lady Gaga. Both sound completely nonidentical and go for different atmospheres.


Dear Enoch Ching,

Let me redirect you, you seem to be lost. This is absolutepunk.net, I believe you were trying to find alternativepress.com (http://www.alternativepress.com). Simple mistake. Both are initialed AP, everyone who is as blatantly wrong, immature, and has a bad taste in music does it. Just click the link and you'll be redirected to your correct, shitty-ass-scene site.

From your friend,
sargentlgfuad

:wave:

[Broclee]

like her as a person and have a lot of respect. but, honestly, this album is terrible. i can't see any other song (possibly "Dance in the Dark") being a legit single. and i didn't think her voice stood out at all, like what i thought it would at least, from hearing her singles first. and the lyrics are brokencyde bad, sorry, but they are.
Alejandro is legit

[sargentlgfuad]

Alejandro is legit

no. that chorus is so bad. along with her laughable spanish accent.

[Broclee]

no. that chorus is so bad. along with her laughable spanish accent.
You're looking at it all wrong. Would it be a massive hit on radio? More than likely. If "She Wolf" can be a hit, Alejandro can.

[sargentlgfuad]

You're looking at it all wrong. Would it be a massive hit on radio? More than likely. If "She Wolf" can be a hit, Alejandro can.

no, that's actually what i was looking at. and i really really do not seeing that being a hit. the only reason it could possibly be a hit, is because it's by Lady Gaga.
and She Wolf isn't that big, it would be more apt to say, "If Owl City can have a hit, then Alejandro can."

but, only time will tell. let's make a bet!

[Broclee]

no, that's actually what i was looking at. and i really really do not seeing that being a hit. the only reason it could possibly be a hit, is because it's by Lady Gaga.
and She Wolf isn't that big, it would be more apt to say, "If Owl City can have a hit, then Alejandro can."

but, only time will tell. let's make a bet!
I'm in college, I don't have the money to be betting!

[sargentlgfuad]

I'm in college, I don't have the money to be betting!

haha, i guess i'll find out about that next year. maybe some other bet...

[Broclee]

haha, i guess i'll find out about that next year. maybe some other bet...
Those dots give me a bad feeling.

[sargentlgfuad]

Those dots give me a bad feeling.

haha, sorry. i didn't know why i put them (...)

[4N6 science]

good review. I for some reason like listening to lady GaGa...Like Drew said her persona is quite captivating and I can't put my finger on it as to why I like her. Her music is quite good. She knows how to create extremely catchy songs. I'm not a fan of pop music by any means but Lady GaGa has certainly gotten my attention.

[Jordan0123]

Oh dear Jordan. You should be ashamed.
Lol, why should I be ashamed? That I like better music than LG?

[Dre Okorley]

Let's admit it.
We love her.

[pulsar]

My pick for best album of 2009, infinitely more interesting than anything I heard in rock music the entirety of 2009.

[nathaniel]

Dear Lady Gaga: Why are you so wierd?

[PenThrive]

My pick for best album of 2009, infinitely more interesting than anything I heard in rock music the entirety of 2009.
+1

[bookwrm25]

How could you seriously write a review and analyze this music.....

[eatbabiesyum]

telephone's awesome and so are a bunch of the songs, and despite my absolute love for vocoding, i didn't like monster :/ it's a good bordering on great album, but not as amazing as people make it out to be

also!

" (not naming names, but it rhymes with “Stobra Carship” and “Korever The Fickest Sids”). "

i completely agree.

[sharpieboy99]

Could you imagine if Rick James was still around today to write for Lady Gaga, Beyonce or Rhianna? That would be sick! The work he did for Teena Marie was ten times better than the pop music today.

[eatbabiesyum]

Could you imagine if Rick James was still around today to write for Lady Gaga, Beyonce or Rhianna? That would be sick! The work he did for Teena Marie was ten times better than the pop music today.

rick james is insanely awesome :D

[sharpieboy99]

Indeed!

[okokok123]

Life-changing.