View Full Version : Harry Potter Or Twilight?
yetconfused
03/28/10, 12:00 AM
my friend's a twihard.
nuff said.
Deadbolt23
03/28/10, 01:07 AM
This better be unanimous.
I don't think I'll ever get into Twilight. The writing sound like it's fit for middle schoolers
Broden Terry
03/28/10, 01:34 AM
Harry Potter without doubt.
Rynaldo
03/28/10, 03:43 AM
im not a fan of harry potter but respect it.anything is better than twilight
introduction
03/28/10, 04:44 AM
wow 100% harry potter. i will never open this thread again, to preserve this memory in my mind.
TSLROCKS
03/28/10, 06:55 AM
Hahahaha Harry Potter by a loooooooong shot
Jaimehere
03/28/10, 07:26 AM
this is not even gonna be close
Deadbolt01
03/28/10, 12:55 PM
God. Potter by a lightyear.
phillycheese37
03/28/10, 01:21 PM
there is no debate. Shame on the people who voted twilight.
sleepyseanzzz
03/28/10, 01:55 PM
HP is HxC
BornUnderPunches
03/28/10, 01:58 PM
They're making a Harry Potter theme park!!!!!!
http://movies.yahoo.com/photos/collections/gallery/2493/harry-potter-orlando-experience/fp
xtheaudition
03/28/10, 02:15 PM
i wish there was a neither option. both are lame as fuck.
jwicklun
03/28/10, 02:21 PM
harry potter: better character development, writing, action, and better movies.
eriatarka24
03/28/10, 02:30 PM
I feel sorry for everyone that votes for Twilight.
Xx sorrow xX
03/28/10, 03:38 PM
Harry potter is better
This is like asking me, "Would you rather be paid $1000, or get punched in the stomach repeatedly for an hour?"
seraph1214
03/28/10, 03:56 PM
I'm a huge Harry Potter fan.
yetconfused
03/28/10, 08:38 PM
i wish there was a neither option. both are lame as fuck.
but, you have to admit, twilight is much lamer than harry potter.
x1onexwo1fx
03/28/10, 10:19 PM
i wish there was a neither option. both are lame as fuck.
harry potter is lame? you must have had a deprived childhood, and your imagination must be nonexistent. i'm sorry.
jk. but seriously. you're lame.
boysandbulletsx
03/28/10, 10:24 PM
I feel like the answer is obvious.
jwicklun
03/28/10, 10:33 PM
at least Rob Paterson dies in one of them.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/6/6a/HPxHC.jpg (http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:CY-lLUNZG2z1lM:http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/6/6a/HPxHC.jpg)
Harry Potter is hardcore.
cuzimlefthanded
03/29/10, 12:36 AM
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/6/6a/HPxHC.jpg (http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:CY-lLUNZG2z1lM:http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/6/6a/HPxHC.jpg)
Harry Potter is hardcore.
Holy shit this is fucking awesome.
theguy77
03/29/10, 01:20 AM
how can you even say twilight. they're both fan fictions that lack any intelligible value, but harry potter is a million times better with script, character development, and surprisingly well-designed plotlines (meanwhile, twilight is full of plotholes that are constantly covered up by some ridiculous skill the vampires have or whatever, and plenty of horrible lines). harry potter also has a unique tongue-in-cheek narrative, almost as if third person writing had taken a blithely amused and sometimes sarcastic observational tone. in addition to this, it never really attempts to go deeper than it is; it remains self-aware of the fact that above all else, it's a fantasy book written about teenagers for teenagers, and in between all of the imaginative fiction is a very realistic and relatable social construct between the students of Hogwarts (not to mention one that covers events and issues that correspond to the characters' ages in the books, as opposed to twilight being about falling in love forever at the age of like 15.) last but not least, for a book about love, twilight sure as hell does a horrible job representing the chemistry of a real connection. i mean all it is is a girl without a real personality, and a guy who does everything for her to the point where she falls into a uselessly submissive and helpless role, who really share little more than lust for each other, but like, an unhealthy and addictive amount of it.
comparing harry potter to twilight is like trying to compare a well-rounded, thoughtful, self-aware band with scene sensibilities like cursive, to any old shitty, scene, powerpop hype band who, apart from their terrible try-hard metaphors, really have nothing APART from that fanatic, juvenile scene appeal to support their music.
Paulb-182
03/29/10, 01:20 AM
I really enjoy Harry Potter books. Can't really say this Twilight thing has ever caught my attention.
KillTheHausEnvy
03/29/10, 06:13 AM
comparing harry potter to twilight is like trying to compare a well-rounded, thoughtful, self-aware band with scene sensibilities like cursive, to any old shitty, scene, powerpop hype band who, apart from their terrible try-hard metaphors, really have nothing APART from that fanatic, juvenile scene appeal to support their music.
I checked out your band solely because of your pro-Potter ranting.
Deadbolt23
03/29/10, 06:25 AM
Why is this a private poll?!
cristinaa
03/29/10, 06:52 AM
Harry Potter x 10000000000000000
Oh_Snap!:O
03/29/10, 06:59 AM
Who the hell voted for twilight? anyways,harry potter for sure.
how can you even say twilight. they're both fan fictions that lack any intelligible value, but harry potter is a million times better with script, character development, and surprisingly well-designed plotlines (meanwhile, twilight is full of plotholes that are constantly covered up by some ridiculous skill the vampires have or whatever, and plenty of horrible lines). harry potter also has a unique tongue-in-cheek narrative, almost as if third person writing had taken a blithely amused and sometimes sarcastic observational tone. in addition to this, it never really attempts to go deeper than it is; it remains self-aware of the fact that above all else, it's a fantasy book written about teenagers for teenagers, and in between all of the imaginative fiction is a very realistic and relatable social construct between the students of Hogwarts (not to mention one that covers events and issues that correspond to the characters' ages in the books, as opposed to twilight being about falling in love forever at the age of like 15.) last but not least, for a book about love, twilight sure as hell does a horrible job representing the chemistry of a real connection. i mean all it is is a girl without a real personality, and a guy who does everything for her to the point where she falls into a uselessly submissive and helpless role, who really share little more than lust for each other, but like, an unhealthy and addictive amount of it.
comparing harry potter to twilight is like trying to compare a well-rounded, thoughtful, self-aware band with scene sensibilities like cursive, to any old shitty, scene, powerpop hype band who, apart from their terrible try-hard metaphors, really have nothing APART from that fanatic, juvenile scene appeal to support their music.
Best thing I've read in a while. Kudos.
catherinexhimel
03/29/10, 09:41 AM
Harry Potter all the way.
catherinexhimel
03/29/10, 09:43 AM
how can you even say twilight. they're both fan fictions that lack any intelligible value, but harry potter is a million times better with script, character development, and surprisingly well-designed plotlines (meanwhile, twilight is full of plotholes that are constantly covered up by some ridiculous skill the vampires have or whatever, and plenty of horrible lines). harry potter also has a unique tongue-in-cheek narrative, almost as if third person writing had taken a blithely amused and sometimes sarcastic observational tone. in addition to this, it never really attempts to go deeper than it is; it remains self-aware of the fact that above all else, it's a fantasy book written about teenagers for teenagers, and in between all of the imaginative fiction is a very realistic and relatable social construct between the students of Hogwarts (not to mention one that covers events and issues that correspond to the characters' ages in the books, as opposed to twilight being about falling in love forever at the age of like 15.) last but not least, for a book about love, twilight sure as hell does a horrible job representing the chemistry of a real connection. i mean all it is is a girl without a real personality, and a guy who does everything for her to the point where she falls into a uselessly submissive and helpless role, who really share little more than lust for each other, but like, an unhealthy and addictive amount of it.
comparing harry potter to twilight is like trying to compare a well-rounded, thoughtful, self-aware band with scene sensibilities like cursive, to any old shitty, scene, powerpop hype band who, apart from their terrible try-hard metaphors, really have nothing APART from that fanatic, juvenile scene appeal to support their music.
This is the most brilliant thing about the debate of the two series I've ever read. Major kudos, man. :D
3 people on this site are under 15.
jwicklun
03/29/10, 11:17 AM
how can you even say twilight. they're both fan fictions that lack any intelligible value, but harry potter is a million times better with script, character development, and surprisingly well-designed plotlines (meanwhile, twilight is full of plotholes that are constantly covered up by some ridiculous skill the vampires have or whatever, and plenty of horrible lines). harry potter also has a unique tongue-in-cheek narrative, almost as if third person writing had taken a blithely amused and sometimes sarcastic observational tone. in addition to this, it never really attempts to go deeper than it is; it remains self-aware of the fact that above all else, it's a fantasy book written about teenagers for teenagers, and in between all of the imaginative fiction is a very realistic and relatable social construct between the students of Hogwarts (not to mention one that covers events and issues that correspond to the characters' ages in the books, as opposed to twilight being about falling in love forever at the age of like 15.) last but not least, for a book about love, twilight sure as hell does a horrible job representing the chemistry of a real connection. i mean all it is is a girl without a real personality, and a guy who does everything for her to the point where she falls into a uselessly submissive and helpless role, who really share little more than lust for each other, but like, an unhealthy and addictive amount of it.
comparing harry potter to twilight is like trying to compare a well-rounded, thoughtful, self-aware band with scene sensibilities like cursive, to any old shitty, scene, powerpop hype band who, apart from their terrible try-hard metaphors, really have nothing APART from that fanatic, juvenile scene appeal to support their music.
this. what I love about Harry Potter is the tongue in cheek humor, and the connections between the characters. As for Twilight, it feels like a 15 year old girl fantasy, writing about a boy she has a crush on, but barily knows.
just.Starla.
03/29/10, 12:22 PM
how can you even say twilight. they're both fan fictions that lack any intelligible value, but harry potter is a million times better with script, character development, and surprisingly well-designed plotlines (meanwhile, twilight is full of plotholes that are constantly covered up by some ridiculous skill the vampires have or whatever, and plenty of horrible lines). harry potter also has a unique tongue-in-cheek narrative, almost as if third person writing had taken a blithely amused and sometimes sarcastic observational tone. in addition to this, it never really attempts to go deeper than it is; it remains self-aware of the fact that above all else, it's a fantasy book written about teenagers for teenagers, and in between all of the imaginative fiction is a very realistic and relatable social construct between the students of Hogwarts (not to mention one that covers events and issues that correspond to the characters' ages in the books, as opposed to twilight being about falling in love forever at the age of like 15.) last but not least, for a book about love, twilight sure as hell does a horrible job representing the chemistry of a real connection. i mean all it is is a girl without a real personality, and a guy who does everything for her to the point where she falls into a uselessly submissive and helpless role, who really share little more than lust for each other, but like, an unhealthy and addictive amount of it.
comparing harry potter to twilight is like trying to compare a well-rounded, thoughtful, self-aware band with scene sensibilities like cursive, to any old shitty, scene, powerpop hype band who, apart from their terrible try-hard metaphors, really have nothing APART from that fanatic, juvenile scene appeal to support their music.
:appl:
mrchainsaw90
03/29/10, 01:16 PM
i hate those godamn glittery vampire bastards
how can you even say twilight. they're both fan fictions that lack any intelligible value, but harry potter is a million times better with script, character development, and surprisingly well-designed plotlines (meanwhile, twilight is full of plotholes that are constantly covered up by some ridiculous skill the vampires have or whatever, and plenty of horrible lines). harry potter also has a unique tongue-in-cheek narrative, almost as if third person writing had taken a blithely amused and sometimes sarcastic observational tone. in addition to this, it never really attempts to go deeper than it is; it remains self-aware of the fact that above all else, it's a fantasy book written about teenagers for teenagers, and in between all of the imaginative fiction is a very realistic and relatable social construct between the students of Hogwarts (not to mention one that covers events and issues that correspond to the characters' ages in the books, as opposed to twilight being about falling in love forever at the age of like 15.) last but not least, for a book about love, twilight sure as hell does a horrible job representing the chemistry of a real connection. i mean all it is is a girl without a real personality, and a guy who does everything for her to the point where she falls into a uselessly submissive and helpless role, who really share little more than lust for each other, but like, an unhealthy and addictive amount of it.
comparing harry potter to twilight is like trying to compare a well-rounded, thoughtful, self-aware band with scene sensibilities like cursive, to any old shitty, scene, powerpop hype band who, apart from their terrible try-hard metaphors, really have nothing APART from that fanatic, juvenile scene appeal to support their music.
I came in here to say this same exact thing verbatim. Damnit. Nicely done sir.
xtheaudition
03/29/10, 01:44 PM
but, you have to admit, twilight is much lamer than harry potter.
true.
xtheaudition
03/29/10, 01:46 PM
harry potter is lame? you must have had a deprived childhood, and your imagination must be nonexistent. i'm sorry.
jk. but seriously. you're lame.
i read the books, the hype & movies killed it for me along time ago.
xapplexpiex
03/29/10, 04:06 PM
Harry Potter hands down. Not even close for me.
Homeless Donut
03/29/10, 06:01 PM
Harry Potter definitely. Books were great, movies were okay. Twilight just sucked hard.
jwicklun
03/29/10, 06:33 PM
the most one-sided AP poll yet.
Neo Cassady
03/29/10, 08:45 PM
This poll is going exactly how it should.
yetconfused
03/29/10, 09:04 PM
3 people on this site are under 15.
4.
damn twatlight lovers.
4.
damn twatlight lovers.
At least that number is growing verrrry slowly.
roughroads
03/29/10, 09:44 PM
well I'm a guy, and not 13 so...
WhoSaidThat?
03/29/10, 10:19 PM
how can you even say twilight. they're both fan fictions that lack any intelligible value, but harry potter is a million times better with script, character development, and surprisingly well-designed plotlines (meanwhile, twilight is full of plotholes that are constantly covered up by some ridiculous skill the vampires have or whatever, and plenty of horrible lines). harry potter also has a unique tongue-in-cheek narrative, almost as if third person writing had taken a blithely amused and sometimes sarcastic observational tone. in addition to this, it never really attempts to go deeper than it is; it remains self-aware of the fact that above all else, it's a fantasy book written about teenagers for teenagers, and in between all of the imaginative fiction is a very realistic and relatable social construct between the students of Hogwarts (not to mention one that covers events and issues that correspond to the characters' ages in the books, as opposed to twilight being about falling in love forever at the age of like 15.) last but not least, for a book about love, twilight sure as hell does a horrible job representing the chemistry of a real connection. i mean all it is is a girl without a real personality, and a guy who does everything for her to the point where she falls into a uselessly submissive and helpless role, who really share little more than lust for each other, but like, an unhealthy and addictive amount of it.
comparing harry potter to twilight is like trying to compare a well-rounded, thoughtful, self-aware band with scene sensibilities like cursive, to any old shitty, scene, powerpop hype band who, apart from their terrible try-hard metaphors, really have nothing APART from that fanatic, juvenile scene appeal to support their music.
Hey, sexy.
Oh dear......
4 votes for Twilight?
I'm ashamed it's gotten that many...
Zippedychick
03/30/10, 12:08 AM
Harry Potter got me into reading but Twilight is something I can be a crazy fan about. It's all fun.
Yellowcard2006
03/30/10, 08:45 AM
Okay well there's at least 4 14 year old girls that post here. (and 1 21 year old) that's for sure
Harry Potter OF COURSE
There are few things I wouldn't choose harry potter over.
yetconfused
03/30/10, 09:38 AM
when you're an overzealous harry potter fan, you come off as a dork.
when you're an overzealous twilight fan, you come off as scary.
juss sayin'...
:shrug:
muttley
03/30/10, 01:15 PM
lol. 126 to 5.
theNatetron
03/30/10, 01:27 PM
harry potter no doubt!
mantipede
03/30/10, 02:18 PM
I don't think I'll ever get into Twilight. The writing sound like it's fit for middle schoolers
A friend of mine who's student teaching had to read the first book for academic purposes (funny in itself, I know) and he said that he did a little research about it...turns out it's actually written on a 6th grade level. Good call.
HometownHero
03/30/10, 04:28 PM
i wish there was a neither option. both are lame as fuck.
M-( Never speak of Harry Potter in this way again.
HometownHero
03/30/10, 04:30 PM
Okay well there's at least 4 14 year old girls that post here. (and 1 21 year old) that's for sure
Harry Potter OF COURSE
There are few things I wouldn't choose harry potter over.
Sex with Bella or sex with Hermione?
Yellowcard2006
03/30/10, 06:07 PM
Sex with Bella or sex with Hermione?
Hermione
Easy choice.
HometownHero
03/30/10, 06:09 PM
Hermione
Easy choice.
You're a good man
Numero10
03/30/10, 06:54 PM
The story and the writing in Harry Potter is 1000 times better
Numero10
03/30/10, 06:57 PM
Sex with Bella or sex with Hermione?
Threesome if we're talking about the actors
Hermione if we're talking literary characters
Jaimehere
03/30/10, 07:04 PM
http://www.childstarlets.com/lobby/bios/portraits/emma_watson12.jpg
:ok:
http://www.terrorhotties.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/kristen-stewart2.jpg
:thumbdwn:
AbbeyCarbs
03/30/10, 07:21 PM
heheheheh
http://whysnape.tripod.com/grouphug.jpg
cmon...
Chalie22
03/30/10, 08:04 PM
harry potter for God's sake
yetconfused
03/31/10, 01:43 AM
http://whysnape.tripod.com/grouphug.jpg
cmon...
i was wondering when someone would get around to posting PPP.
yet another example...harry potter fans simply are more creative.
Sikbeat37
03/31/10, 08:50 AM
I voted for Brand New.
creppin802
03/31/10, 12:43 PM
ugh, who voted for twilight?
jwicklun
03/31/10, 01:12 PM
7 people too many.
fightinirish217
03/31/10, 01:36 PM
Harry Potter. Thank God the results are heavily HP.
xtheaudition
03/31/10, 02:26 PM
M-( Never speak of Harry Potter in this way again.
why don't you go write a blues album about it?
joejoeslacka
03/31/10, 05:51 PM
twilight is the poor man's harry potter
jwicklun
03/31/10, 06:30 PM
twilight is the poor man's harry potter
twilight is a poor man's "Everyone Poops."
Rustash
04/01/10, 09:31 AM
Is this seriously a question?
Millions of kids owe their literacy to HP, including me. The closest Twilight is going to get to that is giving millions of girls their first sexual fantasy
Rustash
04/01/10, 09:36 AM
Sex with Bella or sex with Hermione?
Kristen Stewart- Crackwhore looking "actress" who can barely act.
Emma Watson- Pretty British actress who doesn't even want to act and actually cares about things like an education.
Hermione all the way
HometownHero
04/01/10, 09:39 AM
Kristen Stewart- Crackwhore looking "actress" who can barely act.
Emma Watson- Pretty British actress who doesn't even want to act and actually cares about things like an education.
Hermione all the way
She doesn't want to act?
Rustash
04/01/10, 09:47 AM
She doesn't want to act?
Well, she doesn't want to make it a full-time thing, she'd rather focus on school and such. And I find smart girls rather attractive :-p
skookum
04/01/10, 09:48 AM
twilight cannot compare to harry potter...
twilight = girl who cant decide between necrophilia and bestiality
harry potter = epic awesomeness
HometownHero
04/01/10, 10:09 AM
Well, she doesn't want to make it a full-time thing, she'd rather focus on school and such. And I find smart girls rather attractive :-p
Smart and rich. I like that
Just based off how well the books are written, Harry Potter by a mile.
yetconfused
04/02/10, 12:40 AM
The closest Twilight is going to get to that is giving millions of girls their first sexual fantasy
and their first teenage pregnancy.
tttygxlove
04/02/10, 07:29 AM
Is this even a contest?
SuNDaYSTaR
04/03/10, 05:38 PM
HP is HxCThis.
twilight cannot compare to harry potter...
twilight = girl who cant decide between necrophilia and bestiality
harry potter = epic awesomeness
I just died. Thank you.
Argh, what a horrible poll, better off asking whether you prefer syphilis or chlamydia, which like HP and Twilight are extremely irritating and just won't go away.
The Summer Ends
04/04/10, 02:24 PM
I wish you could see who voted for what.
<3~~~TWILIGHT
04/04/10, 02:25 PM
ugh this websight really sucks
allow me to explain why twilight is miles better then harry potter
1. harry potter is about fake magic and wizards that don't even exist
2. werewolfs and vampires are geneticaly superior to humans (and fake wizards)
3. edward cullen is perfection, ron and harry are ugly nerds
4. bella is a great character and hermoine is one dimentional (oh look at me im smart and a girl wizard) bella has multiple personalites and is in love with edward
5. the cover of twilgiht is really deep and makes you think about it for harry potter its really just stupid and like duh
6. stephanie meyer is smarter than jk rowling
7. harry potter books are too long and boring i mean who has the time to read like 700 pages?
8. harry potter books have huge names like sorcers stone prizoner of azkaban etc. twilight books have nice short to the point deep names like twilight new moon eclipse etc.
9. twilight is a world wide phinomonon and is adored by everyone that isnt stupid (like ppl here......)
10. is harry potter required reading for some college courses? no but twilight sure is.
so shut up before you disrespect twilight in my presents again!
Numero10
04/04/10, 03:06 PM
ugh this websight really sucks
allow me to explain why twilight is miles better then harry potter
1. harry potter is about fake magic and wizards that don't even exist
2. werewolfs and vampires are geneticaly superior to humans (and fake wizards)
3. edward cullen is perfection, ron and harry are ugly nerds
4. bella is a great character and hermoine is one dimentional (oh look at me im smart and a girl wizard) bella has multiple personalites and is in love with edward
5. the cover of twilgiht is really deep and makes you think about it for harry potter its really just stupid and like duh
6. stephanie meyer is smarter than jk rowling
7. harry potter books are too long and boring i mean who has the time to read like 700 pages?
8. harry potter books have huge names like sorcers stone prizoner of azkaban etc. twilight books have nice short to the point deep names like twilight new moon eclipse etc.
9. twilight is a world wide phinomonon and is adored by everyone that isnt stupid (like ppl here......)
10. is harry potter required reading for some college courses? no but twilight sure is.
so shut up before you disrespect twilight in my presents again!
1. Learn how to spell.
2. Obviously magic doesn't exist but neither do vampires or shapeshifters (the Quileutes aren't werewolves, they can shift at any time)
3. You perceive Rob Pattinson to be perfection, not the actual character and that has nothing to do with the merit of either book.
4. Hermione has so many more dimensions than Bella, she's just a girl obsessed with Edward, that is one dimension
5. You can't judge a book by it's cover and the covers of Twilight is not deep in the slightest
6. Meyer isn't anywhere near the level of intelligence of Rowling
7. I read the Deathly Hallows in two days, you make time for a great book
8. Stop saying Twilight things are deep, they're shallow, I read the books and enjoyed the story but the writing is juvenile and there's nothing deep about the names of the series.
9. Twilight probably has the stupidest fans of anything in the world except for crunkcore. Most fans are little girls who like it because it's very simplistic and apparently it's sixth grade level reading.
10. Rowling had balls while writing Deathly Hallows, killing off so many main characters while Meyer choked and only killed some vampire that had no bearing on the story at all.
<3~~~TWILIGHT
04/04/10, 03:29 PM
1. Learn how to spell.
2. Obviously magic doesn't exist but neither do vampires or shapeshifters (the Quileutes aren't werewolves, they can shift at any time)
3. You perceive Rob Pattinson to be perfection, not the actual character and that has nothing to do with the merit of either book.
4. Hermione has so many more dimensions than Bella, she's just a girl obsessed with Edward, that is one dimension
5. You can't judge a book by it's cover and the covers of Twilight is not deep in the slightest
6. Meyer isn't anywhere near the level of intelligence of Rowling
7. I read the Deathly Hallows in two days, you make time for a great book
8. Stop saying Twilight things are deep, they're shallow, I read the books and enjoyed the story but the writing is juvenile and there's nothing deep about the names of the series.
9. Twilight probably has the stupidest fans of anything in the world except for crunkcore. Most fans are little girls who like it because it's very simplistic and apparently it's sixth grade level reading.
10. Rowling had balls while writing Deathly Hallows, killing off so many main characters while Meyer choked and only killed some vampire that no bearing on the story at all.
ugh like you would know anything ?
Numero10
04/04/10, 04:56 PM
ugh like you would know anything ?
Well I like to think I'm a bit of a literature snob and an amateur writer, so I'd hope I know something
<3~~~TWILIGHT
04/04/10, 05:46 PM
Well I like to think I'm a bit of a literature snob and an amateur writer, so I'd hope I know something
ya right like a literiture snob would have harry potter in his fav books
himynameisSEX
04/04/10, 06:00 PM
I haven't' seen Twilight yet so...
Harry Potter :)
Oh_Snap!:O
04/04/10, 07:16 PM
ugh this websight really sucks
allow me to explain why twilight is miles better then harry potter
1. harry potter is about fake magic and wizards that don't even exist
2. werewolfs and vampires are geneticaly superior to humans (and fake wizards)
3. edward cullen is perfection, ron and harry are ugly nerds
4. bella is a great character and hermoine is one dimentional (oh look at me im smart and a girl wizard) bella has multiple personalites and is in love with edward
5. the cover of twilgiht is really deep and makes you think about it for harry potter its really just stupid and like duh
6. stephanie meyer is smarter than jk rowling
7. harry potter books are too long and boring i mean who has the time to read like 700 pages?
8. harry potter books have huge names like sorcers stone prizoner of azkaban etc. twilight books have nice short to the point deep names like twilight new moon eclipse etc.
9. twilight is a world wide phinomonon and is adored by everyone that isnt stupid (like ppl here......)
10. is harry potter required reading for some college courses? no but twilight sure is.
so shut up before you disrespect twilight in my presents again!
http://blog.ugo.com/images/uploads/wtf_blog.jpg
Mandee, darling
04/04/10, 10:06 PM
how can you even say twilight. they're both fan fictions that lack any intelligible value, but harry potter is a million times better with script, character development, and surprisingly well-designed plotlines (meanwhile, twilight is full of plotholes that are constantly covered up by some ridiculous skill the vampires have or whatever, and plenty of horrible lines). harry potter also has a unique tongue-in-cheek narrative, almost as if third person writing had taken a blithely amused and sometimes sarcastic observational tone. in addition to this, it never really attempts to go deeper than it is; it remains self-aware of the fact that above all else, it's a fantasy book written about teenagers for teenagers, and in between all of the imaginative fiction is a very realistic and relatable social construct between the students of Hogwarts (not to mention one that covers events and issues that correspond to the characters' ages in the books, as opposed to twilight being about falling in love forever at the age of like 15.) last but not least, for a book about love, twilight sure as hell does a horrible job representing the chemistry of a real connection. i mean all it is is a girl without a real personality, and a guy who does everything for her to the point where she falls into a uselessly submissive and helpless role, who really share little more than lust for each other, but like, an unhealthy and addictive amount of it.
comparing harry potter to twilight is like trying to compare a well-rounded, thoughtful, self-aware band with scene sensibilities like cursive, to any old shitty, scene, powerpop hype band who, apart from their terrible try-hard metaphors, really have nothing APART from that fanatic, juvenile scene appeal to support their music.
Amazing.
Chromefox
04/04/10, 10:48 PM
ya right like a literiture snob would have harry potter in his fav books Cool trolling. Not very convincing or original though. C-.
vivatoto56
04/04/10, 11:23 PM
Harry Potter is actually well written. Not just a trend.
vivatoto56
04/04/10, 11:25 PM
ugh this websight really sucks
allow me to explain why twilight is miles better then harry potter
1. harry potter is about fake magic and wizards that don't even exist
2. werewolfs and vampires are geneticaly superior to humans (and fake wizards)
3. edward cullen is perfection, ron and harry are ugly nerds
4. bella is a great character and hermoine is one dimentional (oh look at me im smart and a girl wizard) bella has multiple personalites and is in love with edward
5. the cover of twilgiht is really deep and makes you think about it for harry potter its really just stupid and like duh
6. stephanie meyer is smarter than jk rowling
7. harry potter books are too long and boring i mean who has the time to read like 700 pages?
8. harry potter books have huge names like sorcers stone prizoner of azkaban etc. twilight books have nice short to the point deep names like twilight new moon eclipse etc.
9. twilight is a world wide phinomonon and is adored by everyone that isnt stupid (like ppl here......)
10. is harry potter required reading for some college courses? no but twilight sure is.
so shut up before you disrespect twilight in my presents again!
You're so unrealistic I like you.
jwicklun
04/04/10, 11:38 PM
ugh this websight really sucks
allow me to explain why twilight is miles better then harry potter
1. harry potter is about fake magic and wizards that don't even exist
2. werewolfs and vampires are geneticaly superior to humans (and fake wizards)
3. edward cullen is perfection, ron and harry are ugly nerds
4. bella is a great character and hermoine is one dimentional (oh look at me im smart and a girl wizard) bella has multiple personalites and is in love with edward
5. the cover of twilgiht is really deep and makes you think about it for harry potter its really just stupid and like duh
6. stephanie meyer is smarter than jk rowling
7. harry potter books are too long and boring i mean who has the time to read like 700 pages?
8. harry potter books have huge names like sorcers stone prizoner of azkaban etc. twilight books have nice short to the point deep names like twilight new moon eclipse etc.
9. twilight is a world wide phinomonon and is adored by everyone that isnt stupid (like ppl here......)
10. is harry potter required reading for some college courses? no but twilight sure is.
so shut up before you disrespect twilight in my presents again!
this has to be one of the dumbest posts I have ever read. Read some better literature. And what kind of professor would require Twilight for reading? Are you that stupid?
this has to be one of the dumbest posts I have ever read.
This
tttygxlove
04/05/10, 05:25 AM
so shut up before you disrespect twilight in my presents again!
This made me laugh a little.
Numero10
04/05/10, 09:41 AM
ya right like a literiture snob would have harry potter in his fav books
Well I am 15 and I grew up with those books
And yet again, learn how to spell
Debut_Fin
04/05/10, 01:38 PM
Brand New
Debut_Fin
04/05/10, 01:38 PM
ugh this websight really sucks
allow me to explain why twilight is miles better then harry potter
1. harry potter is about fake magic and wizards that don't even exist
2. werewolfs and vampires are geneticaly superior to humans (and fake wizards)
3. edward cullen is perfection, ron and harry are ugly nerds
4. bella is a great character and hermoine is one dimentional (oh look at me im smart and a girl wizard) bella has multiple personalites and is in love with edward
5. the cover of twilgiht is really deep and makes you think about it for harry potter its really just stupid and like duh
6. stephanie meyer is smarter than jk rowling
7. harry potter books are too long and boring i mean who has the time to read like 700 pages?
8. harry potter books have huge names like sorcers stone prizoner of azkaban etc. twilight books have nice short to the point deep names like twilight new moon eclipse etc.
9. twilight is a world wide phinomonon and is adored by everyone that isnt stupid (like ppl here......)
10. is harry potter required reading for some college courses? no but twilight sure is.
so shut up before you disrespect twilight in my presents again!
Troll harder.
yetconfused
04/06/10, 09:17 AM
ugh this websight really sucks
allow me to explain why twilight is miles better then harry potter
1. harry potter is about fake magic and wizards that don't even exist
2. werewolfs and vampires are geneticaly superior to humans (and fake wizards)
3. edward cullen is perfection, ron and harry are ugly nerds
4. bella is a great character and hermoine is one dimentional (oh look at me im smart and a girl wizard) bella has multiple personalites and is in love with edward
5. the cover of twilgiht is really deep and makes you think about it for harry potter its really just stupid and like duh
6. stephanie meyer is smarter than jk rowling
7. harry potter books are too long and boring i mean who has the time to read like 700 pages?
8. harry potter books have huge names like sorcers stone prizoner of azkaban etc. twilight books have nice short to the point deep names like twilight new moon eclipse etc.
9. twilight is a world wide phinomonon and is adored by everyone that isnt stupid (like ppl here......)
10. is harry potter required reading for some college courses? no but twilight sure is.
so shut up before you disrespect twilight in my presents again!
If you don't like this site, you don't have to be on it. Plain and simple.
Almost everyone who likes Harry Potter gave good reasons as to why they do.
Particularly Ryan of Northbrook.
That's the thing about this site. We tend to do our homework first.
Get back to preschool and do yours, starting with your grammar and punctuation.
avada kedavra.
whiterussian
04/06/10, 10:10 AM
I checked out your band solely because of your pro-Potter ranting.
Same here.
Alex DiVincenzo
04/06/10, 12:59 PM
I'm very disappointed in 20 people.
Zippedychick
04/06/10, 01:54 PM
I'm very disappointed in 20 people.
I'm sure that we don't care.
stevenisfading
04/06/10, 02:48 PM
Harry Potter should've been both options. ;-)
Twilight sucks in comparison to Harry Potter.
IceAge/HeatWave
04/06/10, 02:51 PM
harry potter in every which way.
IceAge/HeatWave
04/06/10, 02:52 PM
If you don't like this site, you don't have to be on it. Plain and simple.
Almost everyone who likes Harry Potter gave good reasons as to why they do.
Particularly Ryan of Northbrook.
That's the thing about this site. We tend to do our homework first.
Get back to preschool and do yours, starting with your grammar and punctuation.
avada kedavra[/B].
that was badass.
IceAge/HeatWave
04/06/10, 02:54 PM
ugh this websight really sucks
allow me to explain why twilight is miles better then harry potter
1. harry potter is about fake magic and wizards that don't even exist
2. werewolfs and vampires are geneticaly superior to humans (and fake wizards)
3. edward cullen is perfection, ron and harry are ugly nerds
4. bella is a great character and hermoine is one dimentional (oh look at me im smart and a girl wizard) bella has multiple personalites and is in love with edward
5. the cover of twilgiht is really deep and makes you think about it for harry potter its really just stupid and like duh
6. stephanie meyer is smarter than jk rowling
7. harry potter books are too long and boring i mean who has the time to read like 700 pages?
8. harry potter books have huge names like sorcers stone prizoner of azkaban etc. twilight books have nice short to the point deep names like twilight new moon eclipse etc.
9. twilight is a world wide phinomonon and is adored by everyone that isnt stupid (like ppl here......)
10. is harry potter required reading for some college courses? no but twilight sure is.
so shut up before you disrespect twilight in my presents again!
there is no way that this isn't a fake account. unless you're an idiot.
tyramail
04/06/10, 04:48 PM
this isn't even a competition. harry potter is brilliant.
eriatarka24
04/06/10, 05:07 PM
"Stephanie Meyer is smarter than JK Rowling"
....coming from the person who can't spell WEBSITE correctly
Deadbolt23
04/06/10, 05:44 PM
If you don't like this site, you don't have to be on it. Plain and simple.
Almost everyone who likes Harry Potter gave good reasons as to why they do.
Particularly Ryan of Northbrook.
That's the thing about this site. We tend to do our homework first.
Get back to preschool and do yours, starting with your grammar and punctuation.
avada kedavra.
:lol:
muzicislife31
04/06/10, 08:47 PM
Is this really a question? Harry Potter is a million times better than Twilight in so many ways.
lucky#88
04/07/10, 02:15 PM
you really needed a poll for this?
"You're a wizard Harry..."
yetconfused
04/07/10, 08:31 PM
:lol:
elaborate?
frenchatticus
04/07/10, 10:09 PM
Is this even a question?
AussieBoy
04/07/10, 10:51 PM
haha, its soooo close
Deadbolt23
04/08/10, 12:25 AM
elaborate?
I've not read the thread, but that doesn't surprise me at all. He's famous for his over-explained posts.
Ryan, if you read this and get offended, don't worry. I like them and think more people should be able to explain there points so well
It just made me laugh.
Dirge07
04/08/10, 03:06 PM
I feel sorry for the people that choose Twilight over Potter...
Twilight is like an evil cult, everyone outside of it hates it and pretends it's not there, while everyone inside it screams at the people outside for not joining in until one day they all kill themselves when the franchise finishes.
The people that voted for twilight are probably the same people that think millionaires is actually good music.
vale93kotor
04/14/10, 07:00 AM
Harry Potter
de1337ed
04/14/10, 07:20 AM
neither
vBulletin v3.6.0, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.