91% belive Iraq had WMD's

[yeat182]

www.foxnews.com


check out the poll on the bottom of the page...91% believe iraq had WMD's.

now, i'm not saying this proves anything, it says right on it that it is not a scientific poll, and all the people in the world believing it doesn't make it true. i am only posting because i am surprised by how lopsided the vote is.

[The Nephilm]

yes but being that fox news appeals to the right winged, obviously there would be a lot more conservative people visiting the site.

[BrandNewRock05]

Originally posted by The Nephilm
yes but being that fox news appeals to the right winged, obviously there would be a lot more conservative people visiting the site.
actually i was watching fox news and they again took a poll on what political stance their viewers were. only like 46% were conservatives. i dont know the exact number, but it was less than half. 20 some% were moderates and 30 some% were liberals. Just thought I would add that in.

[yeat182]

Originally posted by The Nephilm
yes but being that fox news appeals to the right winged, obviously there would be a lot more conservative people visiting the site.

yeah, thats true

[BrandNewRock05]

Originally posted by yeat182
yeah, thats true
um, did you read what i posted?

[Matthew]

so 91% BELIEVE iraq has WMDs. yippee-fucking-skippee. 0% of these believers have FOUND the wmds. so 100% of thsoe who belive can go fuck themselves.

[steverocks33]

PLEASE stop posting stuff from fox news. i can take a picture of my shit and post it, but i dont.

[BrandNewRock05]

Originally posted by steverocks33
PLEASE stop posting stuff from fox news. i can take a picture of my shit and post it, but i dont.
its just as valid as any other news source. So dont bitch

[trogdor]

what? so before anything is found we have to assume they're not there?

[BrandNewRock05]

My question is, if you don't have anything, then why dont you let us in without any trouble? Its like a cop pulls over some guy for speeding. Cop runs his liscense on that little computer thing that he has in his car and sees that the driver of the car, we'll call him Joe, has some blemishes on his record. He had a few MIP's, DUI's, marijuana possesion and various other crimes tacked on his name. So the cop walks up to the car and sees that the guy is a little loopy, possibly high. The police officer asks to search the car, Joe says no and gets defensive. We have all seen it on Cops. And it always turns out that the guy who refuses the search has like 200 kilos of heroine hidden in various areas of his car. There is Iraq for you.

[Matthew]

Originally posted by BrandNewRock05
My question is, if you don't have anything, then why dont you let us in without any trouble? Its like a cop pulls over some guy for speeding. Cop runs his liscense on that little computer thing that he has in his car and sees that the driver of the car, we'll call him Joe, has some blemishes on his record. He had a few MIP's, DUI's, marijuana possesion and various other crimes tacked on his name. So the cop walks up to the car and sees that the guy is a little loopy, possibly high. The police officer asks to search the car, Joe says no and gets defensive. We have all seen it on Cops. And it always turns out that the guy who refuses the search has like 200 kilos of heroine hidden in various areas of his car. There is Iraq for you.

wow. if you could be credited with any reasonable view on the US before, it is gone now. the difference in those scenarios is that a cop is a figure of authority. the USA is not. we have no jurisdiction over iraq. we cannot tell them what to do. maybe iraq resents having to prostrate themselves before another nation?

[evil zach]

not mention all of the bland "nothing-to-see-here" footage that must get etided out before "cops" airs

[yeat182]

Originally posted by ScreamoEMOBoy
wow. if you could be credited with any reasonable view on the US before, it is gone now. the difference in those scenarios is that a cop is a figure of authority. the USA is not. we have no jurisdiction over iraq. we cannot tell them what to do. maybe iraq resents having to prostrate themselves before another nation?

the US does have some authority since Iraq had signed a cease fire agreement with america following the gulf war, which called for disarmarment.

[BrandNewRock05]

Originally posted by yeat182
the US does have some authority since Iraq had signed a cease fire agreement with america following the gulf war, which called for disarmarment.
bingo.

[tyte emo]

Heh 91% believe a lie... Nixon's personal lawyer who later testified about watergate came out saying that one of two things is true:
1) the US intelligence was REALLY bad, which is a big problem, you'd think we'd have better intelligence
or
2) the administration flat out lied.

he went on to say that if 2 is the case, this would me the most impeachable offense since watergate.

[Matthew]

Originally posted by BrandNewRock05
bingo.

bingo your fucking self. i'd also like you to remember taht an6y rational person knows that the accuser has to prove guilt. not vice-versa.

and if iraq has the weapons why werent they used during the war?

and save your cops-metaphor bullshit. in your little story officer bob found the weed... we have yet to find the weed. late-night tv anecdotes cant replace evidence or jsutify salughter.

[evil zach]

counter bingo!

I really have nothing to contribute at this point.