PDA

View Full Version : Are Videogames Art?


jwicklun
06/20/10, 10:45 AM
There was a lot of controversy to Roger Ebert's statement that video games "can never be art." What's your position? Do you agree or disagree?

bridgeofeldin
06/20/10, 05:23 PM
Video games require designers, writers, and artists just like cartoons so why wouldn't it be art? But this can raise a whole different debate about what art is in the first place

xapplexpiex
06/20/10, 08:27 PM
Art is subjective and all about perspective. I think they are art. Just play the game Okami. To me, that is a beautiful game and is full of artistic value. But there is no exact answer. Some people go in art galleries and point to certain pieces saying, "that is not art. that is trash." It's all about perspective. Or it's just that Ebert is a really, really old man.

AussieBoy
06/21/10, 03:56 AM
not yet

Salamandrax
06/21/10, 04:43 PM
final fantasy.

Sean Rizzo
06/21/10, 04:44 PM
final fantasy.
This, but I picked "don't know" because it really depends on the video game. You should include an option for that.

Also, Tales is great. :wave:

kdefrisc
06/21/10, 04:52 PM
I wouldn't go so far as to say that videogames can never be art, but I also would not call videogames an "artform" just by their nature, same with boardgames, cartoons, and other forms of media. There are certainly some videogames/cartoons/etc that I would consider a work of art, some amount of art goes into many videogames, etc. but they are not all art.

But then again, the perception of art is very subjective, and my opinion means very little on the subject lol

Salamandrax
06/21/10, 05:59 PM
There are certainly some videogames/cartoons/etc that I would consider a work of art, some amount of art goes into many videogames, etc. but they are not all art.

but then again, there are some works of modern art that people are hesitant to consider 'real' art.
honestly, i think that you can justify anything as 'art' as long as you have enough of an imagination to work with.

btw why exactly did ebert say that videogames can't be art?

jwicklun
06/21/10, 06:09 PM
but then again, there are some works of modern art that people are hesitant to consider 'real' art.
honestly, i think that you can justify anything as 'art' as long as you have enough of an imagination to work with.

btw why exactly did ebert say that videogames can't be art?

http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2010/04/video_games_can_never_be_art.html

MoChroi
06/21/10, 07:17 PM
art can be anything. anyways its called game design. any form of design is art. the way you interact with something is art. the characters are art. commentary about the world around us can be art. basically art is the communication of the world and rationality that is inside oneself and the way that we react to the world around us.

SuNDaYSTaR
06/22/10, 03:30 AM
basically art is the communication of the world and rationality that is inside oneself and the way that we react to the world around us.Amen.

Deadbolt23
06/22/10, 05:58 AM
That article is a really interesting read.

cityscapes101
06/22/10, 09:57 AM
This is such a coincidence I just read this article in GameInformer. Well, that's probably where you got it from.
Anyway, games are definitely art. They include 3 main types of art: visual art, music, and writing the script. There are people to do all of those things. Games are practically made by artists. So, yeah, games are definitely art.

CoheedForever
06/22/10, 10:37 AM
final fantasy.
exactly!

SunnyInPhilly
06/22/10, 10:58 AM
Just finished playing Alan Wake a few weeks ago and it was practically an interactive movie. If movies can be art, so can video games.

zachff
06/22/10, 11:27 AM
Ahh, long response got deleted.

Short version no, not yet

Tristan Needler
06/22/10, 01:18 PM
Some can be, some are not.

I feel like for a while games were moving closer to being a legitimate art form and now they're moving back away from it.

BornUnderPunches
06/22/10, 01:20 PM
they're more entertainment than "art". Like I consider many pop singers to be "entertainment" but I don't consider them to be true art at all

jwicklun
06/22/10, 01:57 PM
they're more entertainment than "art". Like I consider many pop singers to be "entertainment" but I don't consider them to be true art at all

film can be considered entertainment, does that make it not art? Look at games like Katamari Damacy, Super Mario Galaxy, Flower, and Okami. There is a huge amount of creativity and artwork put into those games, just as the same for movies. Hell other games follow a narrative just like movies, but that does not make it art?

BornUnderPunches
06/22/10, 02:01 PM
film can be considered entertainment, does that make it not art? Look at games like Katamari Damacy, Super Mario Galaxy, Flower, and Okami. There is a huge amount of creativity and artwork put into those games, just as the same for movies. Hell other games follow a narrative just like movies, but that does not make it art?
it can be entertaining AND art.

ScarletGrove
06/22/10, 05:32 PM
I am a Video Game Design Artist and people who think that video games are not art is kind of insulting.. but everyone is entitled to their own opinion.

I believe video games are most definitely art.

Say Nothing
06/22/10, 08:02 PM
Absolutely! More so as the time progresses I feel like.

Yellowcard2006
06/22/10, 10:16 PM
ya

ctmk
06/23/10, 04:45 PM
Bioshock, Red Dead Redemption, Halo, etc.
the question is; how are these NOT art?

ctmk
06/23/10, 04:46 PM
Some can be, some are not.

I feel like for a while games were moving closer to being a legitimate art form and now they're moving back away from it.

explain how they are regressing

Lemmi!
06/23/10, 06:51 PM
kind of. the gta's and (most of) the shooters aren't though

gahhh123
06/23/10, 08:36 PM
It depends on the individual person. I think it's not yet an art, but it's getting there. People used to think movies weren't art either, but over time, movies with artistic values came into play. People like Roger Ebert started calling movies art, and as a result, starts to categorize what's art and what's not art. Funny how it goes back to a new form of entertainment.

re7ard1337
06/25/10, 10:58 AM
Yes or no is much too general. Brokencyde and Mozart both created music, but we all know which is art, and which is not.

Elscorcho2008
06/25/10, 03:00 PM
Yes or no is much too general. Brokencyde and Mozart both created music, but we all know which is art, and which is not.


Yeah. Brokencyde are musical geniuses. Mozarts one old fart.

Echo Park
06/25/10, 04:23 PM
There was a lot of controversy to Roger Ebert's statement that video games "can never be art." What's your position? Do you agree or disagree?
it's art as much as movies are

Echo Park
06/25/10, 04:24 PM
you can vomit on a canvas and call it art.

jwicklun
06/25/10, 04:35 PM
kind of. the gta's and (most of) the shooters aren't though

I wouldn't say that. Games like Metroid Prime and Portal show a lot of creative gameplay mechanics, despite being shooters. As violent as GTA is, there is a lot put into the epic scale of the city as well as the dialogue and the characters. But thats just me.

spansen
06/28/10, 01:52 PM
i voted no. they're games.. do you consider freeze tag an art?

of course, in some sense, they are.. because they're created by graphic designers.. but, they're not meant to be appreciated in the same category as the term "art" is generally associated with.

but. no.

HometownHero
06/28/10, 07:37 PM
I don't play video games but they are obviously art and voting no is wrong.

Zippedychick
06/28/10, 09:36 PM
I don't really know. I love to play them and some of them are just amazing to look at and play but I've actually never thought of them as art.

anzyz
06/29/10, 03:59 PM
The stories of the two Bioshock games are deeper than 99% of whatever Hollywood pumps out. Not to mention those games look absolutely stunning

snowboarderkid
06/30/10, 02:32 PM
Of course they are

Star Slight
06/30/10, 06:15 PM
Videogames are art.
Brokencyde is art.
Gummo is art.

Art =/= good or even intelligent at times.

Sean Rizzo
06/30/10, 06:48 PM
The stories of the two Bioshock games are deeper than 99% of whatever Hollywood pumps out. Not to mention those games look absolutely stunning
qft!

xcloud66x
06/30/10, 07:40 PM
as much as I hate to say this, 'anything is art if you name it so'

Alex DiVincenzo
06/30/10, 10:17 PM
I think whether you admit that the final product is art or not s a moot point, but there is undeniably art that goes into them.

SunnyInPhilly
07/01/10, 06:53 AM
Ebert wrote an 1800-word pseudo-apology in the Sun Times. Basically said he still thinks they're not art, but he shouldn't have said so.

http://gizmodo.com/5577176/ebert-i-was-a-fool-to-disrespect-video-games-on-the-internet

zachff
07/01/10, 06:56 AM
Ebert wrote an 1800-word pseudo-apology in the Sun Times. Basically said he still thinks they're not art, but he shouldn't have said so.

http://gizmodo.com/5577176/ebert-i-was-a-fool-to-disrespect-video-games-on-the-internet
Was just about to come in and post this. Here's a link to his actual article and not Giz:
http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2010/07/okay_kids_play_on_my_lawn.html

knowthisx
07/01/10, 07:40 AM
Movie critic should limit his opinion to movies.

yetconfused
07/01/10, 06:32 PM
definitely art.

carnotaurhunter
07/02/10, 09:59 PM
YES! Has that chinless motherfucker ever heard of Portal?!

tonighttonight0
07/03/10, 09:29 AM
No.

Nick Hull
07/03/10, 07:18 PM
final fantasy.
beat me to it.

Asthenia-182
07/07/10, 11:04 AM
BioShock is art...