PDA

View Full Version : Iraqi Mobile Labs Nothing To Do With Germ Warfare


evil zach
06/15/03, 07:12 AM
http://www.fighttheoctopus.com/index.php?option=news&task=viewarticle&sid=113

Iraqi Mobile Labs Nothing To Do With Germ Warfare
15 Jun 2003
An official British investigation into two trailers found in northern Iraq has concluded they are not mobile germ warfare labs, as was claimed by Tony Blair and President George Bush, but were for the production of hydrogen to fill artillery balloons, as the Iraqis have continued to insist.
The conclusion by biological weapons experts working for the British Government is an embarrassment for the Prime Minister, who has claimed that the discovery of the labs proved that Iraq retained weapons of mass destruction and justified the case for going to war against Saddam Hussein.


Instead, a British scientist and biological weapons expert, who has examined the trailers in Iraq, told The Observer last week: 'They are not mobile germ warfare laboratories. You could not use them for making biological weapons. They do not even look like them. They are exactly what the Iraqis said they were - facilities for the production of hydrogen gas to fill balloons.'

The conclusion of the investigation ordered by the British Government - and revealed by The Observer last week - is hugely embarrassing for Blair, who had used the discovery of the alleged mobile labs as part of his efforts to silence criticism over the failure of Britain and the US to find any weapons of mass destruction since the invasion of Iraq.

The row is expected to be re-ignited this week with Robin Cook and Clare Short, the two Cabinet Ministers who resigned over the war, both due to give evidence to a House of Commons inquiry into whether intelligence was manipulated in the run-up to the war. It will be the first time that both have been grilled by their peers on the Foreign Affairs Select Committee over what the Cabinet was told in the run-up to the war.

MPs will be keen to explore Cook's explanation when he resigned that, while he believed Iraq did have some WMD capability, he did not believe it was weaponized.

The Prime Minister and his director of strategy and communications, Alastair Campbell, are expected to decline invitations to appear. While MPs could attempt to force them, this is now thought unlikely to happen.

The Foreign Secretary, Jack Straw, is expected to give evidence the week after.

The revelation that the mobile labs were to produce hydrogen for artillery balloons will also cause discomfort for the British authorities because the Iraqi army's original system was sold to it by the British company, Marconi Command & Control.

© Guardian Newspapers Limited 2003

Ronin
06/15/03, 07:22 AM
Originally posted by cal1082
I'd believe it when you have more than 2 people who inspected the trailers say other wise.

It doesn't say that only 2 people inspected them
I would imagine there were more.

But hell, if one expert examined it and said it wasn't germ warfare, i'd believe him. I'm led to believe that the differences between a hydrogen filling station and a germ warfare lab are pretty substantial

evil zach
06/15/03, 07:23 AM
Originally posted by cal1082
I'd believe it when you have more than 2 people who inspected the trailers say other wise.
yeah, I'm pretty sure more then 2 people wer einvolved in inspect them. even if it was only 2 people, so what? its not like its their job or anything:rolleyes:

yeat182
06/15/03, 07:33 AM
Originally posted by Ronin
It doesn't say that only 2 people inspected them
I would imagine there were more.

But hell, if one expert examined it and said it wasn't germ warfare, i'd believe him. I'm led to believe that the differences between a hydrogen filling station and a germ warfare lab are pretty substantial

yes but if one expert examined them atnd said they were for germ warfare you wouldn't believe them...

Ronin
06/15/03, 08:37 AM
Originally posted by cal1082
I'd be more likely to believe the article if more than 2 of the people who DID inspect the trailor came forward.

You misinterpreted
"British scientist and biological weapons expert" is talking about one person, he's both. I would imagine (though obviously I can't be sure) that the Guardian probably spoke to more members of the team before they made their claim. Though even if they didn't this one member is almost certainly expressing the findings of the whole group.

BustaNutz
06/21/03, 06:45 AM
Originally posted by cal1082
even worse if it's talking about one, how do you know this one guy is expressing the findings of the whole group?

You're an idiot. When Hans Blix goes into inspect Iraq for weapons of mass destruction he takes a team of over a hundred people with him, but when the report is due, he presents it, by himself or with one other person (whose name I can't remember for the life of me). The person who presented the findings of the group was the one who is quoted in the article. He is not presenting his personal opinions he is presenting what the group found. To have EVERYONE in the group presenting their findings would be chaotic and would make the process run much longer.

You are just grasping at straws at this point.

Ronin
06/21/03, 08:24 AM
Originally posted by cal1082
blix and his team isnt even there inspecting.

He's using Blix as an example