What I would like to see...

[BustaNutz]

Do you remember back when Clinton was in office. The economy was booming, unemployment was down, we were respectable... wait I'm getting of track... When Clinton was in office and his scandal came about, I remember how nasty the republicans were. They said things to ruin the man. Not just political things, they said personal things about Clinton's family. They said things which had absolutely not business being said into a camera. I remember all the personal attacks, you could turn on a TV and flip to any news channel and see some republican railing Clinton.

No granted Clinton fucked up. But he did so in his private life, and due the semantics (which ALL politicians play with) it can even be argued that he didn't complete lie... But still he was impeached for comitting purgery blah blah blah, it wasn't really a huge deal from an internation standpoint, it's not like we went to war over it...

Now it seems Bush may have used a few facts in a speech which weren't completely true, if at all. This is also considered, lying. The very thing we nearly crucified Clinton for doing earlier. Only the stakes are higher, this was something Bush DID use to help start a war. So what I'd like to see is this, I'd like to see some Democrats take the low-road (like the Republicans are accustomed to doing) and fling some shit. I want to see them attack Bush's integrity, make fun of his drunk-ass daughters and laugh at the fact he hasn't mastered the art of masticating (chewing) as was evidenced when he choked on a pretzel. I want them to make it personal, just like the Republicans did to Clinton. That's what I'd like to see.

[evil zach]

I think insted of an election they should have a cage match

[BustaNutz]

Originally posted by evil zach
I think insted of an election they should have a cage match

Hehe, yea with barbwire. And to make it interesting we'll let Bush use whatever weapons he's already found in Iraq...

[WithStamin]

This is something I posted before about Bush's "lying":
Originally posted by WithStamin
These were Bush's exact words: "The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa." That is absolutely true. Britian told us that. Now we find out that Britian may have learned that from none other than the French. Bush did not lie.

Do you really think that we went to war because Saddam tried to buy uranium from Niger? I hope not. It was a miniscule fraction of the huge case against Saddam's regime. But I guess you would have prefered that we leave him in power...

[BrandNewRock05]

Difference in the lies. Its like saying "Danny told me that the Wheel of Fortune is on at 7:30" but in actuality its on at 7. You didnt know it was a lie is what I am saying. Then there is "No I didnt drink all of your booze" When you know damn well you did. Bush stated that the British told him, that is actually the truth, sure what the British said may have been false, but Bush didnt lie knowingly. Clinton parked his dick in some fat chick's mouth. He knew where his cock and balls were located. He knew he had sexual relations with "that woman" and when confronted, blatently lied. There is a difference

[NOFXdesendents5]

Originally posted by BrandNewRock05
Difference in the lies. Its like saying "Danny told me that the Wheel of Fortune is on at 7:30" but in actuality its on at 7. You didnt know it was a lie is what I am saying. Then there is "No I didnt drink all of your booze" When you know damn well you did. Bush stated that the British told him, that is actually the truth, sure what the British said may have been false, but Bush didnt lie knowingly. Clinton parked his dick in some fat chick's mouth. He knew where his cock and balls were located. He knew he had sexual relations with "that woman" and when confronted, blatently lied. There is a difference

hahahaha:D



and why the fuck would you choose monica lewinsky? id choose like carmen elektra for my presidential bitch:cool:

[Charlito Cafe]

Originally posted by BrandNewRock05
Difference in the lies. Its like saying "Danny told me that the Wheel of Fortune is on at 7:30" but in actuality its on at 7. You didnt know it was a lie is what I am saying. Then there is "No I didnt drink all of your booze" When you know damn well you did. Bush stated that the British told him, that is actually the truth, sure what the British said may have been false, but Bush didnt lie knowingly. Clinton parked his dick in some fat chick's mouth. He knew where his cock and balls were located. He knew he had sexual relations with "that woman" and when confronted, blatently lied. There is a difference

I would think that Bush's "lie" would carry more weight because it's actually related to U.S. policy. You'd think that any material going into the State of the Union address would get a thorough background check, and it just shows incompetency on Bush's speechwriters part, which could in turn reflect poorly on him in 2004.

[BrandNewRock05]

Originally posted by Charlito Cafe
I would think that Bush's "lie" would carry more weight because it's actually related to U.S. policy. You'd think that any material going into the State of the Union address would get a thorough background check, and it just shows incompetency on Bush's speechwriters part, which could in turn reflect poorly on him in 2004. Bush wasnt lying, Clinton did, there is the difference.

[evil zach]

Clinton isn't up for re-ellection. Weather or not he lied is irrelevent.

[BrandNewRock05]

Originally posted by evil zach
Clinton isn't up for re-ellection. Weather or not he lied is irrelevent.
Hey, Busta Nutz brought it up

[BustaNutz]

Originally posted by BrandNewRock05
Difference in the lies. Its like saying "Danny told me that the Wheel of Fortune is on at 7:30" but in actuality its on at 7. You didnt know it was a lie is what I am saying. Then there is "No I didnt drink all of your booze" When you know damn well you did. Bush stated that the British told him, that is actually the truth, sure what the British said may have been false, but Bush didnt lie knowingly. Clinton parked his dick in some fat chick's mouth. He knew where his cock and balls were located. He knew he had sexual relations with "that woman" and when confronted, blatently lied. There is a difference

Hey shut up, ever heard this? To Clinton, getting head was not a sexual relation, so by saying "I did not have sexual relations with that woman" he didn't lie, he was just dishonest. Does that sound far-fetched? Well now you know how yours sounded. And more, Bush knew it was completely reliable. It's kind of like when you tell your friends you have three reasons for something and two are alright but the third is shaky at best. Three reasons to go to Iraq 1.) They support terra' (I know it's terror but Dubya has difficulty pronouncing it the right way) 2.) Saddam is opressive 3.) They have weapons of mass destruction capable of blowing us all up tomorrow (ehhh... not so much) the correct answer for reason number 3 was oil.

My point being, Bush's was a factor in the death of several Americans. Clinton's just caused him to be verbally assasinated. Which is why I think we should verbally assasinate Bush (the democrats), because the Republicans set a precedent. And it's not like he's a good leader anyways...

[BrandNewRock05]

Originally posted by BustaNutz
Hey shut up, ever heard this? To Clinton, getting head was not a sexual relation, so by saying "I did not have sexual relations with that woman" he didn't lie, he was just dishonest. Does that sound far-fetched? Well now you know how yours sounded. And more, Bush knew it was completely reliable. It's kind of like when you tell your friends you have three reasons for something and two are alright but the third is shaky at best. Three reasons to go to Iraq 1.) They support terra' (I know it's terror but Dubya has difficulty pronouncing it the right way) 2.) Saddam is opressive 3.) They have weapons of mass destruction capable of blowing us all up tomorrow (ehhh... not so much) the correct answer for reason number 3 was oil.

My point being, Bush's was a factor in the death of several Americans. Clinton's just caused him to be verbally assasinated. Which is why I think we should verbally assasinate Bush (the democrats), because the Republicans set a precedent. And it's not like he's a good leader anyways...
Clinton didnt kill any Americans....alright then, if you say so. And dont mind me, I am just going to have anal sex right now, but its not a sexual relationship because I am not penitrating the vagina... what a load of crap.

[evil zach]

we all clinton was on the inside what bush is on the outside