Senators Filibuster Non-Binding Iraq Vote

[Jason Tate]

The Senate vote “sidetracked a nonbinding measure expressing disagreement with Bush’s plan to deploy an additional 21,500 troops to Iraq. The vote was 49-47, or 11 short (http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070205/ap_on_go_co/us_iraq_113) of the 60 needed to go ahead with debate, and left the fate of the measure uncertain.”



UPDATE: The vote was along party lines, except for Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT), who voted for the filibuster, and Sens. Susan Collins (R-ME) and Norm Coleman (R-MN) who voted against it. Four senators, including John McCain (R-AZ), did not vote.

[x togepi x]

isn't it awesome how the republicans spent all last sessions whining that the democrats fillibuster everything, even though the dems didn't have the spine to fillibuster at all, and yet now they turn around and do it a month into the new session? i love politics.

[Jason Tate]

isn't it awesome how the republicans spent all last sessions whining that the democrats fillibuster everything, even though the dems didn't have the spine to fillibuster at all, and yet now they turn around and do it a month into the new session? i love politics.
I was wondering if anyone else would remember that. Hahaha.

[Jason Tate]

Last night, Senate conservatives successfully blocked debate (http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/06/washington/06cong.html?hp&ex=1170824400&en=243d1aa790e2a104&ei=5094&partner=homepage) on a bipartisan anti-escalation resolution. At least eight senators who claim to oppose sending more U.S. troops to Iraq voted the wrong way, supporting the conservative filibuster. They include Sen. John Warner (R-VA) — who actually introduced the anti-escalation resolution (http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/06/warner-lieberman/) in question — and Sen. Chuck Hagel (R-NE) — who has aggressively demanded that every U.S. senator take a position on Iraq (http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/24/hagel-chides-colleagues-on-iraq-vote-%e2%80%98if-you-wanted-a-safe-job-go-sell-shoes%e2%80%99/).
Here’s a full list of the senators who voted to protect President Bush and block debate on Iraq (http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110 &session=1&vote=00044), along with their public disapprovals of Bush’s escalation plan:
– Sen. John Warner (R-VA): “Sen. John Warner (R-VA) will introduce a resolution today ‘making clear that he does not support the President on increasing the troop levels in Iraq’ and calling escalation ‘a mistake,’ (http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/22/warner-iraq-resolution/).”
– Sen. Chuck Hagel (R-NE): “It’s Alice in Wonderland. … I’m absolutely opposed to sending any more troops to Iraq. (http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2007/01/against_the_surge.html) It is folly.” (Cosponsored Warner resolution.)
– Sen. Gordon Smith (R-OR): “This is the president’s Hail Mary pass. … We are extending an ineffective tactic (http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2007/01/11/cracks_appear_in_party_support/) to further the status quo.” (Cosponsored Warner resolution.)
– Sen. John Sununu (R-NH): “Sen. John Sununu told CNN Tuesday he will not support President Bush’s plan to send an additional 21,000 U.S. troops to Iraq (http://www.cnn.com/POLITICS/blogs/politicalticker/2007/01/sununu-says-he-wont-support-bushs-iraq.html), although he hasn’t yet decided whether to back a Democratic resolution opposing the move.”
– Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-ME): “We should not place more American servicemen and women in harm’s way (http://pressherald.mainetoday.com/news/state/070111bush.html) to instill a peace that the Iraqis are not willing to seek for themselves.” (Cosponsored Warner resolution.)
– Sen. Sam Brownback (R-KS): “I do not believe that sending more troops to Iraq is the answer. (http://www.kansas.com/mld/kansas/16429391.htm) … Iraq requires a political rather than a military solution.”
– Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA): “We’re all looking for a plan that will work. … The current plan is not working, and 21,500 additional troops — it’s a snowball in July. It’s not going to work. (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/30/AR2007013000456.html)“
Notably, Sens. Norm Coleman (R-MN) and Susan Collins (R-ME) (http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110 &session=1&vote=00044), who say they oppose escalation, resisted partisan pressure and voted against the conservative filibuster.
As for Sen. Hagel, who said recently, “We need to put the Congress on record here (http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/face_012107.pdf)” — he is now “on record,” in support of Bush’s escalation.
UPDATE: Commenters have noticed that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) is listed as having opposed debate on Iraq. In fact, Reid changed his vote to “no” at the end of the vote simply as a procedural move so he could later move to reconsider the motion (i.e., revote) — a right reserved only for those voting with the majority.

[asmolitor]

non-binding.

[Jason Tate]

non-binding.
That's how it starts.

[saysmydoctor]

This non-binding resolution is an adult version of "Nuh-uh!" "Yeah-huh!" "Nuh-uh!" "Yeah-huh!" That's why conservatives don't support this.

And because they are pains in the ass.