View Full Version : Nuclear or Biological Attack Likely by 2013
ToMyBetterAngel
12/02/08, 12:56 AM
"The United States can expect a terrorist attack using nuclear or more likely biological weapons before 2013, reports a bipartisan commission in a study being briefed Tuesday to Vice President-elect Joe Biden."
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081202/ap_on_go_ot/wmd_study_9
Sad to think that more large scale attacks are just completely inevitable.
boykosaurus
12/02/08, 07:14 AM
FOX has been milking this like no other this morning.
wrppdarndyrfngr
12/02/08, 07:33 AM
FOX promoting fear? get outta town!
Mercy Medical
12/02/08, 08:42 AM
Niiiiiiiiiiiiice! Too bad the world will be over by 2012! HAH!
driftsandpulls
12/02/08, 11:32 AM
Niiiiiiiiiiiiice! Too bad the world will be over by 2012! HAH!
lol that's what I was gonna say!
saysmydoctor
12/02/08, 12:41 PM
I feel safe.
Burn That Shit
12/02/08, 02:12 PM
It's sad that all this shit is happening, hopefully it will get better in a few years down the road.
open mind
12/02/08, 02:18 PM
i don't think it's unavoidable but it wouldn't suprise me....it's one of the potential costs of living in a free and open society.
|adr3naLine|
12/07/08, 12:59 PM
We've been told this millions of times in the past 3 years. Why is it a big deal now all the sudden? I'm pretty sure that 4 years ago we were supposed to have a nuclear attack by...now?
But I guess that's one of the consequences of pissing off a whole side of the world.
|adr3naLine|
12/07/08, 01:02 PM
Oh and I also think these people fail to realize that if you hit us, we're gonna hit you back 10 times harder.
I just wish that this shit would end and everyone would realize that the worlds a big fuckin' place. So there's room for you to do your shit over there and we can do our shit over here. (And yes I include America's interventionist policy in this)
Skadrist
12/07/08, 01:18 PM
Oh and I also think these people fail to realize that if you hit us, we're gonna hit you back 10 times harder.
I just wish that this shit would end and everyone would realize that the worlds a big fuckin' place. So there's room for you to do your shit over there and we can do our shit over here. (And yes I include America's interventionist policy in this)
Above all the question remains on how do you strike back if a stateless entity like al-Qaeda uses weapons of mass destruction.
andrew4045
12/07/08, 01:27 PM
http://civilizer.files.wordpress.com/2007/11/middle-finger-of-the-apocalypse.jpg
born to expire
12/21/08, 10:11 PM
Oh and I also think these people fail to realize that if you hit us, we're gonna hit you back 10 times harder.
I just wish that this shit would end and everyone would realize that the worlds a big fuckin' place. So there's room for you to do your shit over there and we can do our shit over here. (And yes I include America's interventionist policy in this)
Sorry to burst your bubble but the number one reason why we are so scared of a terrorist attack with a WMD is that there is no return address for a non-state organization. That, plus religious fanaticism, creates a pretty scary situation. Read Graham Allison's Preventing Nuclear Terrorism: The Ultimate Catastrophe... really interesting book I read for class this semester.
Sad to think that more large scale attacks are just completely inevitable.
Unless Obama can somehow effectively combat terrorism, which seems unlikely.
jagermeister
12/22/08, 09:01 AM
Oh and I also think these people fail to realize that if you hit us, we're gonna hit you back 10 times harder.
I just wish that this shit would end and everyone would realize that the worlds a big fuckin' place. So there's room for you to do your shit over there and we can do our shit over here. (And yes I include America's interventionist policy in this)
Just curious how its possible to strike back after being obliterated by a nuclear bomb or biological weapon. They're supposed to kill us, you know...
born to expire
12/22/08, 09:50 AM
Just curious how its possible to strike back after being obliterated by a nuclear bomb or biological weapon. They're supposed to kill us, you know...
One nuke or biological attack won't destroy the entire country. We will still have a second strike capability, it's just a matter of not knowing where to strike. The other problem is how our government will function if DC is hit.
the thread
12/22/08, 03:13 PM
Above all the question remains on how do you strike back if a stateless entity like al-Qaeda uses weapons of mass destruction.
You invade Iraq.
Machu505
12/22/08, 03:24 PM
I say we either invade Burma or Uzbekistan next.
steviestare
12/27/08, 10:46 PM
The problem with FOX milking this was that they were distorting the facts. The article said that it was likely that one would take place SOMEWHERE in the world by 2013. FOX kept on blowing over that part of the article, making it seem like they government was saying one was likely to happen here.
DejaNew
12/28/08, 12:49 PM
just curious, but wasnt there also a big scare about the entire fucking world crashing in 2000? there's gonna be bullshit theories all the time, to make people scared.
steviestare
12/28/08, 01:33 PM
Blame FOX.
gnarly sky
12/29/08, 03:52 PM
Oh sick, I love to live in fear. Thanks propaganda.
vBulletin v3.6.0, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.