PDA

View Full Version : Alexisonfire - Watch Out!


Klatzke
12/15/08, 10:10 AM
Alexisonfire - Watch Out!
Record Label: Equal Vision Records
Release Date: June 29, 2004

I became familiar with Alexisonfire's Watch Out! only recently. I've owned Crisis for quite some time, and when I saw this album with a bright orange "used" sticker at FYE, I decided to add it to my collection. I'm a fan of their sophomore album, and logic follows that I should also enjoy another of theirs, especially since it seems to be the more widely accepted of the two. So, on the way home, I popped it in the CD player of my friend's truck and waited to hear what it is that makes Watch Out! the more widely loved Alexisonfire album.

For those unfamiliar with the band, their clean vocalist, Dallas Greene, is on par with some of the best vocalists currently in "the scene." The first noticeable difference I found was that Greene's singing seems to be a bit more pronounced and varying on this album, compared to Crisis. As well, they seem to have less structured songs on this album (which I see as a good thing). While Crisis sometimes delves into all-too-familiar structures, Watch Out! seems to use structures that are both more diverse, and many times, more entertaining. The instrumentation on this album also seems to be headed a completely different direction than on their latest album. On that album, the guitarists just get so lost in the sound that they aren't memorable. Here, however, if you pay a bit of attention, you'll hear the guitars raging and attempting to make a name for themselves over the smooth vocal talents of Greene and the bite of George Pettit's screaming.

Alexisonfire approached post-hardcore pretty head-on with this release. However, they're really not playing the standard fare that I've come to expect from this genre. One of the biggest indicators of this, at least to me, are the not-so-structured-structures that they use. Not following the whole verse-chorus-verse-chorus structure leaves room for them to play around with their sound throughout the tracks. There isn't anywhere they do this more than vocally. They balance the screaming and clean vocals well, and in many places don't make it obvious what you have coming next. They have some songs that are basically all clean vocals, while they have some that are more aggressive and see Pettit playing a large role.

Most of the tracks on this album are solid, and I can't really point out any of them that I would cut from the album. The ones that really shine are "Side Walk When She Walks" and "No Transitory," because of the great balance between the vocalists and Greene's killer performance. "Sharks And Danger" is also a great track, and has Greene singing over a sample until the end of the track where Pettit enters with a flourish.

I can kind of see why fans of the band would have been a little bit upset with Crisis. In the places where this album really shines, Crisis is a kind of let-down. While I still vouch for Crisis as a solid and powerful album, in comparison to Watch Out! it does look a tad pale. Overall, Watch Out! is a solid album. They don't follow any real norms, and for a debut album, it's an ambitious release. They showcase just about everything great about their sound and manage not to misstep. I no longer have to wonder why Watch Out! is Alexisonfire's golden child -- I've listened to it any found out for myself.

post-hardcore; From Autumn to Ashes
myspace.com/alexisonfire (http://www.myspace.com/alexisonfire)

White
12/22/08, 10:14 PM
"I'm a fan of their sophomore album, and logic follows that I should also enjoy another of theirs, especially since it seems to be the more widely accepted of the two."

Watch Out! is their sophomore album; there are three.

trash zoo
12/23/08, 09:26 AM
yeah, if you think Watch Out and Crisis are different, check out the self-titled

Klatzke
12/23/08, 10:32 AM
Ah shit, I realized that later and forgot to change it.

aoftbsten
12/23/08, 12:13 PM
love this album. one of my all time favorites

Iwudstilldie4u
12/23/08, 12:55 PM
Which are the songs that are all clean vocals?

k0d1ak
12/23/08, 01:47 PM
Sorry mate, but this ain't exactly a resplendent review.
If you aren't going to have a decent grasp on the context of an album's release... that is all fine and dandy, but don't even try to put on your historical perspective hat. I mean you can always rate an album on its technical merits (always thought the subjectivity of the whole process makes just about ever reviewer ever look like a jackass but that is besides the point) without having to access "the scene" at the time of its release or any other works by the artist. The problem with your review is that you attempt to engage this record on a "where is it within the band's discography" level, but the result overwhelmingly sloppy. I won't call you out on the nomenclature slip-up with "sophomore album", since that one has already been mentioned... but it is not really a trivial detail that they did actually put out an album. Of particular note is the fact that their self titled is just this side of hardcore. That little factoid tends to color heavily on the progression of the band's style through their three full-lengths (ignoring the demos/split stuff).
Your deployment of "post-hardcore" is reminiscent of Swiss cheese, but same root issue I suppose. There's tons of other stuff to rip you on, but I presume it would be less than constructive criticism.

Oh and if anyone likes Dallas Green and hasn't check out City and Colour yet, well then you are a flipping idiot. That shit is like buttah.

Klatzke
12/23/08, 02:55 PM
Sorry mate, but this ain't exactly a resplendent review.
If you aren't going to have a decent grasp on the context of an album's release... that is all fine and dandy, but don't even try to put on your historical perspective hat. I mean you can always rate an album on its technical merits (always thought the subjectivity of the whole process makes just about ever reviewer ever look like a jackass but that is besides the point) without having to access "the scene" at the time of its release or any other works by the artist. The problem with your review is that you attempt to engage this record on a "where is it within the band's discography" level, but the result overwhelmingly sloppy. I won't call you out on the nomenclature slip-up with "sophomore album", since that one has already been mentioned... but it is not really a trivial detail that they did actually put out an album. Of particular note is the fact that their self titled is just this side of hardcore. That little factoid tends to color heavily on the progression of the band's style through their three full-lengths (ignoring the demos/split stuff).
Your deployment of "post-hardcore" is reminiscent of Swiss cheese, but same root issue I suppose. There's tons of other stuff to rip you on, but I presume it would be less than constructive criticism.

Oh and if anyone likes Dallas Green and hasn't check out City and Colour yet, well then you are a flipping idiot. That shit is like buttah.
How the fuck does your argument make sense? I basically wrote this as it is, just with some mentioning of the differences between it and Crisis, I didn't mention the band prior, or anything else. I don't get your problem with this review. This IS post-hardcore when it's in a genre, and I don't see how you can really argue that. My real slip up with the review was thinking that it was their debut, although if I just change that small tongue-slip-up then there's nothing I've said that's really all that misled as far as I can tell.

Seriously, how am I "trying to get in the historical context" when all I do is talk about the album as is, and not like "oh, this shit is leagues better than their other stuff" when I don't mention anything but the album I've already heard? Read my Crisis review, it's along the same league. The only flaw in this is that I forgot about their self-titled (and truthfully thought it was just an EP until I checked). Not mentioning progression from one album to the next doesn't make it a flawed review. Plenty of reviewers review albums that they're not familiar with the back-catalogue of, and that's the same in this case. If every review was based off of "oh they've changed so much from here to here" then new listeners of the band would have no clue what to expect.

I don't engage the album "based on it's place in the discography" I just compare it to thier (junior) release, Crisis. Try reading a little closer. There's no mention of the back-catalogue, and the only comparisons are those that I have valid opinons on. I stated that Watch Out! gets more praise, and it definitely does, (at least around here). I wouldn't assume the quality of another of their albums without listening to it and I don't.

Theow593
12/24/08, 01:47 PM
kodak you really ended up saying nothing...

hoshbrown41
12/29/08, 07:24 PM
Oh and if anyone likes Dallas Green and hasn't check out City and Colour yet, well then you are a flipping idiot. That shit is like buttah.

Uh... I really liked his vocals in Alexis but was not a fan of City and Colour

RamirezTx
01/01/09, 09:24 PM
I heard this one after Crisis but it's still a terribly good CD.

That Girl Possessed is one of the best tracks...

softhands
01/11/09, 08:37 PM
Great album, you can listen straight through it.

maker_break
06/25/09, 06:25 PM
Favorite AoF album. Get Fighted is the perfect song. It hits on everything that's destroying music these days. "This shit's not about pants, and this shit's not about shirts, and this shit's definitely not about hair. This shit's about having a good fucking time!" Gotta love that.

HanLuk
01/14/12, 07:24 AM
One of my favorite albums in the genre, think it deserves a better score compared to the review, but oh we'll, at least there is a good review of it here. Good job man.