PDA

View Full Version : Would you rather...


SouthernCross40
01/10/09, 02:44 PM
The joyous angry abortion thread that got linked from the main page today gave me a thought:

Would you rather a baby be:
1) Aborted
2) Adopted by a loving, married, gay couple

AAAAAAAAAAAND GO!

SouthernCross40
01/10/09, 02:44 PM
P.S. this is all in jest. Please don't call me a heartless, homophobic evil bastard.

Machu505
01/10/09, 03:35 PM
You heartless, homophobic evil bastard.

SouthernCross40
01/10/09, 03:51 PM
You heartless, homophobic evil bastard.

^ Why I love this site

wroteurname
01/10/09, 03:55 PM
I would rather have a broken arm than have my arms around you.

SouthernCross40
01/10/09, 03:56 PM
But would you rather have a punctured lung, than waste your breath on this thread?

Neo Cassady
01/10/09, 09:50 PM
If ANYONE says option 1 they are a horrible person. (I'm pro-choice...no one wants abortion)

musicroxmysox
01/12/09, 08:34 PM
But would you rather have a punctured lung, than waste your breath on this thread?

Haha very nicely done :-d

Definitely option 2, I don't think I can really understand any argument against it

Lueda Alia
01/12/09, 08:38 PM
I don't see why people would have to think about this.

J.C.
01/12/09, 09:58 PM
I'll go with 3) aborted by a loving, married, gay couple.

1Roth4
01/13/09, 05:57 AM
I don't see why people would have to think about this.

this thread is too much.

sdbrown
01/14/09, 11:02 AM
If ANYONE says option 1 they are a horrible person. (I'm pro-choice...no one wants abortion)

What if the baby had type 1 infant spinal muscular atrophy?

leifstar
01/14/09, 11:06 AM
The joyous angry abortion thread that got linked from the main page today gave me a thought:

Would you rather a baby be:
1) Aborted
2) Adopted by a loving, married, gay couple

AAAAAAAAAAAND GO!


Would there be any implications during pregnancy?

SouthernCross40
01/14/09, 02:26 PM
Oh my, serious responses...I fear for the Republic.

tambam
01/14/09, 02:26 PM
I'd choose to be adopted by a gay couple over certain straight couples, in fact.

stayforawhile
01/14/09, 02:29 PM
Clearly adopted.

recomposed
01/14/09, 03:13 PM
I'll go with 3) aborted by a loving, married, gay couple.

i laughed a little too hard at that

1Roth4
01/15/09, 06:49 AM
Oh my, serious responses...I fear for the Republic.

You'll get more serious responses when you start asking serious questions.

sjb2k1
01/15/09, 10:53 AM
I'll go with 3) aborted by a loving, married, gay couple.
my wife and i are coming to get you. best leave your door unlocked.

J.C.
01/15/09, 11:32 AM
my wife and i are coming to get you. best leave your door unlocked.

Make it quick. http://planetsmilies.net/shy-smiley-9438.gif

SouthernCross40
01/15/09, 02:35 PM
You'll get more serious responses when you start asking serious questions.

Haha I meant that it scared the crap out of me that some people were taking the question seriously, not the other way around.

thespearkid
01/15/09, 03:10 PM
Awful thread is fucking awful.

xshady121
01/16/09, 07:02 AM
The joyous angry abortion thread that got linked from the main page today gave me a thought:

Would you rather a baby be:
1) Aborted
2) Adopted by a loving, married, gay couple

AAAAAAAAAAAND GO!

in an orphanage.

1Roth4
01/16/09, 07:13 AM
Haha I meant that it scared the crap out of me that some people were taking the question seriously, not the other way around.

didn't you get the memo about non-serious threads in this web-site? Not Allowed.

out.

sjb2k1
01/16/09, 08:48 AM
in an orphanage.
seriously?

Jefferson Rank
01/16/09, 08:53 AM
Why am I making this decision anyway?

xshady121
01/16/09, 09:21 AM
seriously?

Yes. Seriously.

sjb2k1
01/16/09, 11:10 AM
Yes. Seriously.
a loving, gay couple really sounds that bad?

J.C.
01/16/09, 11:29 AM
Don't waste your time, Steph.

I still get a kick out of people who claim to be for small government while favoring the legislating of sexuality.

Machu505
01/16/09, 11:38 AM
a loving, gay couple really sounds that bad?

Of course. :rolleyes:

sjb2k1
01/16/09, 11:47 AM
Don't waste your time, Steph.

I still get a kick out of people who claim to be for small government while favoring the legislating of sexuality.

http://www.slapupsidethehead.com/wp-content/media/2007/06/oh-the-ironing.jpgi know, i know. some days i just can't help myself.

hey, do you go by joe or joseph? (or jc)
Of course. :rolleyes:well, at least he didn't choose abortion. lol.

J.C.
01/16/09, 12:03 PM
i know, i know. some days i just can't help myself.

hey, do you go by joe or joseph? (or jc)


Joseph or JC, either's fine. I usually go by JC online because it's quicker to type. :shrug:

xshady121
01/16/09, 12:24 PM
a loving, gay couple really sounds that bad?
Yes.

sjb2k1
01/16/09, 12:26 PM
Joseph or JC, either's fine. I usually go by JC online because it's quicker to type. :shrug:cool.
Yes.worried they'd turn the kid gay?

sdbrown
01/16/09, 01:35 PM
Yes. Seriously.
You honestly think the child would be better off with no parents as opposed two? That is sick

xshady121
01/16/09, 01:52 PM
You honestly think the child would be better off with no parents as opposed two? That is sick


As opposed to two, civially unioned gay parents. Yes, I do.

J.C.
01/16/09, 01:57 PM
You dragged this out way too far for such a lame point.