PDA

View Full Version : A valid reason for impeachment....


Justin_stacy
08/30/05, 09:24 PM
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=46019

A national emergency
Buchanan
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: August 29, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern


© 2005 Creators Syndicate Inc.


On Aug. 12, New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson declared a state of emergency "due to a chaotic situation involving illegal alien smuggling and illegal drug shipments" on his southern border. Three days later, Gov. Janet Napolitano followed suit in Arizona.

Reason: the crisis on the border. The ally-ally-in-free immigration policy of George Bush and Vicente Fox, beloved of corporate America, has created a hell on our southern border.


Those Southwestern states are being inundated by illegal aliens trashing ranches, killing cattle, committing crimes and eating up tax dollars. The traffic in narcotics and human beings from Mexico is a national scandal and a human-rights disgrace.

What is true of New Mexico and Arizona is true of our nation, which is now home to an estimated 10 million to 15 million aliens who have broken our laws and broken into our country. It is a mark of the cowardice of our leaders that they are so terrified of being called "bigots" they tolerate this criminality. The moral rot of political correctness runs deep today in both national parties.

A president like Teddy Roosevelt would have led the Army to the border years ago. And if Fox did not cooperate, T.R. would have gone on to Mexico City. Nor would Ike, who deported all illegal aliens in 1953, have stood still for this being done to the country he had defended in war.

What are these Bush Republicans afraid of? Dirty looks from the help at the country club?

The question of whether America is going to remain one nation, or whether our Southwest will wind up as a giant Kosovo – separated by language and loyalty from the rest of America – is on the table.

Where is Bush? All wrapped up in the issue of whether women in Najaf will have the same rights in divorce and custody cases as women in Nebraska. His legislative agenda for the fall includes a blanket amnesty for illegals, so they can be exploited by businesses who want to hold wages down as they dump the social costs for their employees – health care, schools, courts, cops, prisons – onto taxpayers.

Not only have Richardson and Napolitano awakened – they are on the front lines – so, too, has Hillary Clinton, who has spoken out against illegal immigration with a forthrightness that makes Bush sound like a talking head for La Raza.

Why is a Republican Congress permitting this president to persist in the dereliction of his sworn duty?

George Bush is chief executive of the United States. It is his duty to enforce the laws. Can anyone fairly say he is enforcing the immigration laws? Those laws are clear. People who break in are to be sent back. Yet, more than 10 million have broken in with impunity. Another million attempt to break in every year. Half a million succeed. Border security is homeland security. How, then, can the Department of Homeland Security say America is secure?

Who can guarantee that, of the untold millions of illegals here, and the scores of thousands ordered deported for crimes who have disappeared into our midst, none is a terrorist waiting for orders to blow up a subway or mall and massacre American citizens?

Most of these illegals come to work to send money back to their families. They are not bad people. But because they are predominantly young and male, they commit a disproportionate share of violent crimes.

Why should U.S. citizens be assaulted, robbed, raped and murdered, and have their children molested, because their government will not enforce its own laws?

Is this not an indictment of democracy itself? What dictatorial regime would put up with this?

The Republican Party claims to be a conservative party. But what kind of conservative is it who, to cut a few costs or make a few bucks, will turn his family's home into a neighborhood flop house?

In a recent poll, 40 percent of Mexicans – 40 million people – said they would like to come to the United States, and 20 percent expressed a willingness to break in. Time to cut the babble about how NAFTA is going to solve the problem. This is a national emergency.

Twice, George Bush has taken an oath to "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States." Article IV, Section 4 of that Constitution reads, "The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against invasion."


Well, we are being invaded, and the president of the United States is not doing his duty to protect the states against that invasion. Some courageous Republican, to get the attention of this White House, should drop into the hopper a bill of impeachment, charging George W. Bush with a conscious refusal to uphold his oath and defend the states of the Union against "invasion."

It may be the only way left to get his attention, before the border vanishes and our beloved country dissolves into MexAmerica, what T.R. called a "polyglot boarding house for the world."

Cal Smith
08/30/05, 09:51 PM
The impeachment bit is a little much but I completely agree with Buchanan. Sad thing is it won't even be a blip on the radar until more people care, or there's another attack.

youcomebeforeyo
09/01/05, 03:56 AM
The United States would serve it's interests a lot better if it pressured the IMF and World Bank to drop it's privitisation reforms which force the nation to lower labour standards to attract big corporations and cut money from it's education and healthcare budgets and instead invest it into failed think big projects.

These have a culmative effect of making Mexico a worse place to live and the United States a more deseriable place to flee.



On the issue of what to do about the immigrants in the mean time though, I would be clueless. I'm not sure of the US policy on aliens.

Justin_stacy
09/01/05, 08:43 AM
. I'm not sure of the US policy on aliens.
the official policy is pretend they dont exists.....

splitsecond
09/01/05, 10:49 AM
While I agree witht he huge problem illegal immigration and smuggling is causing in the southwest, I think that this criticism of Bush is a little harsh. He definitely isnt doing as much as he could, but I think that saying the policy is "pretend they dont exist" is a bit of a misnomer.

Justin_stacy
09/01/05, 11:16 AM
It may be a bit direct, but it is not a "misnomer" of the situation. No one in government is taking a realistic approach to stopping this invasion, and that's a fact. They care more about appeasing big business, ignorant liberal PC groups and Mexico then protecting the average citizens. So saying they are pretending it doesn't exist is a valid description.

Now of course everything is not Bush's fault, but you say "he isn't doing as much as he could," but to that I’d ask what exactly is he doing? He won't fund border guards (even after the 9/11 report called for it), he won't demand that governors put the National Guard on the border (which is their one intended purpose), he won’t put the military on the border (even though they protect the borders of numerous other countries), he calls civilian "patriots" vigilantes, he's proposing a blanket amnesty to criminals, and he's cozied up to the corrupt president of mexico who, himself, is helping to instigate the invasion. What the hell do you think Bush is doing? Buchanan made a great point about Bush's current value system, he cares more about an Iraqi womyn's right to vote then he does about the security of the citizens of his own country.

Everyone knows that Bush is a conservative in name only, but his stance on immigration is ridiculous. I can’t even imagine a far lefter like Kerry taking a worse stance on it