What's Everyone Think?

[Get Fucked]

The Canadian Supreme Courts just ruled (this week) that Tobacco companies can now be held responsible for the healthcare costs of Canadian's who have gotten cancer through smoking, British Columbia is the first province to take advantage of this and are sueing (not sure for how much). Ontario faces 1 Billion Dollars in healthcare associated with cancers annually, so it'll suck so hard for the tobacco industry if every province sues hahaha.

[Andy]

Hahahahaha, awesome.

[Tristan Needler]

i'm not a tobacco company so, works for me.

[FstFtsVsFences]

I agree with the Norwegian.

[Lueda Alia]

yeah this is awesome.

[hXc_pwnage]

I think that it's a stupid reason. I mean, should we sue tanning salons for giving people skin cancer or what about people suing McDonalds because they were fat pieces of lard? It's not the companies fault that you don't have any strength.

But since tabacco companies suck and I hate cigarettes, rock on!

[Get Fucked]

I think that it's a stupid reason. I mean, should we sue tanning salons for giving people skin cancer or what about people suing McDonalds because they were fat pieces of lard? It's not the companies fault that you don't have any strength.

But since tabacco companies suck and I hate cigarettes, rock on!Well the argument they're using is that most of the healthcare costs are coming from elderly with cancer who started up back in the 50's when tobacco companies would promote smoking as a healthy habit and fully deny that it killed or that it was addictive. Whatever the reasons, more power to them.

[hXc_pwnage]

Well the argument they're using is that most of the healthcare costs are coming from elderly with cancer who started up back in the 50's when tobacco companies would promote smoking as a healthy habit and fully deny that it killed or that it was addictive. Whatever the reasons, more power to them.
Those cases are definitely appropriate.

I wonder how many people that work in tabacco companies actually smoke cigarettes. Hahaha.

[ghostyouare]

This is so fucking retarded.

Well the argument they're using is that most of the healthcare costs are coming from elderly with cancer who started up back in the 50's when tobacco companies would promote smoking as a healthy habit and fully deny that it killed or that it was addictive. Whatever the reasons, more power to them.
that makes sense, but fuck modern smokers.

[FstFtsVsFences]

Those cases are definitely appropriate.

I wonder how many people that work in tabacco companies actually smoke cigarettes. Hahaha.
I'd imagine a lot. Wouldn't they get discounts?