What Happens in Saw II?

[jeremyfromva]

I know....I just want to see what other people are thinking is gonna happen!

[Stereo Mike]

People DIE.

[aminorthreat55]

Everyone leaves the movie theater 5 minutes in, realizing they have just thrown away a decent sum of money on a terrible movie.

Or at least that's what I would do. But knowing the general taste of the American movie-going public, it will break box office records.

[jeremyfromva]

Everyone leaves the movie theater 5 minutes in, realizing they have just thrown away a decent sum of money on a terrible movie.

Or at least that's what I would do. But knowing the general taste of the American movie-going public, it will break box office records.

Actually Saw II is really quite clever....from the interviews that the directors have had to legal issues the movie is having....they did a really good job of covering up the twists

[MLLMillenium]

Idk.. as long as it doesnt suck.. I knew this wuold come.. the first one was a m a z i n g. I was very surprised i thought it would blow. I think they shouldn't make it but w.e

[jeremyfromva]

Idk.. as long as it doesnt suck.. I knew this wuold come.. the first one was a m a z i n g. I was very surprised i thought it would blow. I think they shouldn't make it but w.e
This one was better and 100% necessary to complete the story....don't tempt me to spoil it for you...

[WakingTheMisery]

one of the guys in the house is in on it?

[believethehyph]

as long as is as good or better than the 1st one (which will be hard) i'll be as happy as tits.

[jeremyfromva]

as long as is as good or better than the 1st one (which will be hard) i'll be as happy as tits.
Than you shall be very titulating come october 28th!

[believethehyph]

i heard it was out on halloween?

[jeremyfromva]

i heard it was out on halloween?
Friday before Halloween

[believethehyph]

Friday before Halloween
ah even better, less time to burn.

[richter915]

why don't people like the original saw??? I have no idea how anyone can dislike it...I mean, the twist after the twist was totally unexpected (and I DOUBT any of you really thought of that)...ya if you compare it to se7en or something then of course this looks like shit...but then you should also compare the budget and actors used in this...are you really gonna compare Brad Pitt to the guy who was in robin hood men in tights???

and let's assume you're not comparing...the plot was somewhat original (thought a bit unrealistic)...but it did have a certain amount of shock value which was well done imo...I dunno.

[jeremyfromva]

Saw II is more clever than the first...u will be shocked

[FrancesTheMute]

i'm definitely seeing it.


too bad it has to be that saturday afternoon, i hate going to the movies during the day *i work nights*

[niveK]

Everyone leaves the movie theater 5 minutes in, realizing they have just thrown away a decent sum of money on a terrible movie.

Or at least that's what I would do. But knowing the general taste of the American movie-going public, it will break box office records.Word.

A good idea forced into sequals untill the public stops spending money on it.

[lackofcolour 13]

people in a house have to kill eachother to survive.

[WakingTheMisery]

i'm definitely seeing it.


too bad it has to be that saturday afternoon, i hate going to the movies during the day *i work nights*
its cheaper...

[radiofriendly]

why don't people like the original saw??? I have no idea how anyone can dislike it...I mean, the twist after the twist was totally unexpected (and I DOUBT any of you really thought of that)...ya if you compare it to se7en or something then of course this looks like shit...but then you should also compare the budget and actors used in this...are you really gonna compare Brad Pitt to the guy who was in robin hood men in tights???

and let's assume you're not comparing...the plot was somewhat original (thought a bit unrealistic)...but it did have a certain amount of shock value which was well done imo...I dunno.i mentioned this in another post elsewhere, but ill repeat

why i despised SAW:

I thought the film had 'arthouse ambition' as one critic put it, but there were absolutely no redeeming performances in this film whatsoever. this was nothing more than a poor excercise in audience manipulation. The film glorified in ugliness instead even coming close to scaring, and the conclusion was so contrived and completely implausible. instead of building us up through structure and giving us a true twist(i don't know...perhaps maybe involving someone that was in the film for more than 30 seconds!!!), it goes for cheap deception for the sake of trying to look original. we go through maybe 100 possible suspects, before the real murderer is revealed, and to our shock, it turns out he was(in theory) absent the entire film. a true twist is not revealing the killer as a character who was never in the movie. now that's sheer brilliance at work. i hate films like that. and then we're supposed to believe that all these sick and elaborate traps were suppose to have some kind of motive other than conveniently filling a two hour movie.

the film had a few nice touches, but hardly enough to cover a potboiler script, and the worst performances of the year. i don't think anybody should have to settle for cheap fodder like this. i hope the sequel improve on all levels, and maybe resurrect an otherwise intriguing idea, and make a better movie, but i doubt it. does anybody come close to feelin me on this?!

[xgloryxfadesx27]

Wasen't the original Saw made on an ungodly small budget?

I bet Saw II will be ten times more disgusting and grotesque than the first...and I bet it will totally rule.

At least I hope it will. Hopefully they don't ruin it with the sequel.

[jeremyfromva]

Wasen't the original Saw made on an ungodly small budget?

I bet Saw II will be ten times more disgusting and grotesque than the first...and I bet it will totally rule.

At least I hope it will. Hopefully they don't ruin it with the sequel.
Yes it was made on a little over 1 million dollars

Saw II has more gore although its not much more...its still the same use your imagination approach...

And yes it does totally rule....all kinds of ass

[A picasso blue]

they already gave away the twist at the end of the first, what more is there? you know who the killer is so...

[jeremyfromva]

they already gave away the twist at the end of the first, what more is there? you know who the killer is so...

u think u know who the killer is!!!
that's all i'm gonna say!

[Anton Djamoos]

u think u know who the killer is!!!
that's all i'm gonna say!
So basically the killer from the first has a tape from someone else who is the real mastermind.

[punkrockcasual]

So basically the killer from the first has a tape from someone else who is the real mastermind.
Duh. Just like the guy from the first one who you think is the "killer." I saw that comming.

[merv the perv]

u think u know who the killer is!!!
that's all i'm gonna say!
How do you know so much about it?

[ImJerry]

This is how I see it going down..

It will be released to video and dvd three months after it hits theaters because it (didn't think this could happen) sucked worse than the first. Everyone will claim it is amazing, better than the first. I'll go over to someone I know's house and it'll be on TV and that will be the only way I will see this movie because there is no way in hell I'm wasting eight dollars on a gore, shit film. :)

[im-not-okay]

yeah i have to go with the hurley dude: people die :D

[radiofriendly]

u think u know who the killer is!!!
that's all i'm gonna say!haha, oh man, it smells already...

[sleepygrlgreen]

Everyone leaves the movie theater 5 minutes in, realizing they have just thrown away a decent sum of money on a terrible movie.

Or at least that's what I would do. But knowing the general taste of the American movie-going public, it will break box office records.What?? I can't wait until it comes out. I loved the first one.

i mentioned this in another post elsewhere, but ill repeat

why i despised SAW:

I thought the film had 'arthouse ambition' as one critic put it, but there were absolutely no redeeming performances in this film whatsoever. this was nothing more than a poor excercise in audience manipulation. The film glorified in ugliness instead even coming close to scaring, and the conclusion was so contrived and completely implausible. instead of building us up through structure and giving us a true twist(i don't know...perhaps maybe involving someone that was in the film for more than 30 seconds!!!), it goes for cheap deception for the sake of trying to look original. we go through maybe 100 possible suspects, before the real murderer is revealed, and to our shock, it turns out he was(in theory) absent the entire film. a true twist is not revealing the killer as a character who was never in the movie. now that's sheer brilliance at work. i hate films like that. and then we're supposed to believe that all these sick and elaborate traps were suppose to have some kind of motive other than conveniently filling a two hour movie.

the film had a few nice touches, but hardly enough to cover a potboiler script, and the worst performances of the year. i don't think anybody should have to settle for cheap fodder like this. i hope the sequel improve on all levels, and maybe resurrect an otherwise intriguing idea, and make a better movie, but i doubt it. does anybody come close to feelin me on this?!it was a low budget film (around 1.2 million dollars) and for the amount of money that they had for production, i think they did a great job. granted the acting wasn't amazing, but it no where near sucked. a lot of people including myself compare saw to se7en (the premise was sort of similar), but when you do that, keep in mind that se7en had a production budget of about 30 million! that's a massive difference, so again, for what money they had... i couldn't ask for more.

[Chemical Love]

I'm gonna see it.