AbsolutePunk.net

AbsolutePunk.net (http://www.absolutepunk.net/forum.php)
-  Politics (http://www.absolutepunk.net/forumdisplay.php?f=17)
  -  Freedom of Attraction VS Incest Ban (http://www.absolutepunk.net/showthread.php?t=3017542)

MisfitsFan2013 01/18/13 08:25 PM

Freedom of Attraction VS Incest Ban
 
http://www.absolutepunk.net/faq.php?...liciesandrules
Here's the rules for this site. Notice that I'm not going to break them in this thread.
I'm not discussing illegal activities, I'm discussing the legalization of illegal activities(like legalizing recreational drugs or legalizing sodomy, which I think both should be legal). If I were discussing illegal activities I would be talking about committing these acts and I have not committed incest. And please anyone who posts on this thread do not talk about committing incest, talk about whether it should be legal or not. This is a legit political issue because it can ruin the lives of peaceful people. It doesn't ruin their lives because of incest itself, instead the government is who ruins their lives with their unjust laws.

Seeing as I think it's best to assume love is not a choice, I think if any 2 peaceful people consent to loving each other, then I don't think it's wrong because it is not harming anyone. Children created through incest does not have bad effects like people think it does and the chances are just as small as a non-incest couple giving birth to a baby with birth defects. Also, farmers inbreed cattle and other livestock and chances are we are eating inbred meat when we eat at a place like McDonalds.

If you make a claim of incest causing deformities in children, then please show photos of people you know personally and proof that you know them personally to justify your claim (because otherwise people could lie in an attempt to debunk something that they don't agree with).

Make sure that all comments and posts are within the policy rules like this post is.
We need to respect the site. And please no shit talking. Lets have a rational, logical, debunking debate.

birdman 01/18/13 08:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MisfitsFan2013 (Post 117901422)
http://www.absolutepunk.net/faq.php?...liciesandrules
Here's the rules for this site. Notice that I'm not going to break them in this thread.
I'm not discussing illegal activities, I'm discussing the legalization of illegal activities(like legalizing recreational drugs or legalizing sodomy, which I think both should be legal). If I were discussing illegal activities I would be talking about committing these acts and I have not committed incest. And please anyone who posts on this thread do not talk about committing incest, talk about whether it should be legal or not. This is a legit political issue because it can ruin the lives of peaceful people. It doesn't ruin their lives because of incest itself, instead the government is who ruins their lives with their unjust laws.

Seeing as I think it's best to assume love is not a choice, I think if any 2 peaceful people consent to loving each other, then I don't think it's wrong because it is not harming anyone. Children created through incest does not have bad effects like people think it does and the chances are just as small as a non-incest couple giving birth to a baby with birth defects. Also, farmers inbreed cattle and other livestock and chances are we are eating inbred meat when we eat at a place like McDonalds.

If you make a claim of incest causing deformities in children, then please show photos of people you know personally and proof that you know them personally to justify your claim (because otherwise people could lie in an attempt to debunk something that they don't agree with).

Make sure that all comments and posts are within the policy rules like this post is.
We need to respect the site. And please no shit talking. Lets have a rational, logical, debunking debate.


I actually do know a woman who is a product of incest, and while I am not going to post her photo because I am a decent human being, I can tell you that she has numerous medical afflictions. None of which manifest themselves physically.

Having said that, what two people do in the privacy of their bedroom is none of my business. I just think it is impossible to legislate incest without forcing either party to medically prevent themselves from having children. So while I have no interest in the federal government legislating love and companionship, I even more so have no interest in the federal government telling a man he has to get castrated if he wants to marry his sister.

open mind 01/18/13 09:18 PM

someone wants to bang their 13 year old sister.

caveBEAR 01/18/13 09:25 PM


crackedthesky 01/18/13 09:37 PM

What did I just read

caveBEAR 01/18/13 09:45 PM

Did he suggest eating inbred children?

Qadriyyah 01/18/13 09:53 PM

There's an incest ban? Dammit! Count me out for the next reunion.

Also I see what you're trying to do, OP. Not cool, stop being an ass.

zion the lion 01/18/13 10:03 PM

Time out. Love is totally a choice.

Ricketts 01/18/13 10:11 PM

Not posting photos because that's pretty terrible but I know a woman who was a child of incest. She's actually very pretty but she had some problems. She had some serious jaw surgeries and braces for like 6 years. She also has heart & lung conditions.

I pretty much agree with Birdman. I don't care if they want to be together but you can't force them not to have children. So, with the interest of the potential child in mind, I'm content with the laws as they are.

White 01/18/13 11:01 PM

Quote:

If you make a claim of incest causing deformities in children, then please show photos of people you know personally and proof that you know them personally to justify your claim (because otherwise people could lie in an attempt to debunk something that they don't agree with).


RyanPm40 01/18/13 11:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MisfitsFan2013 (Post 117901422)
http://www.absolutepunk.net/faq.php?...liciesandrules
Here's the rules for this site. Notice that I'm not going to break them in this thread.
I'm not discussing illegal activities, I'm discussing the legalization of illegal activities(like legalizing recreational drugs or legalizing sodomy, which I think both should be legal). If I were discussing illegal activities I would be talking about committing these acts and I have not committed incest. And please anyone who posts on this thread do not talk about committing incest, talk about whether it should be legal or not. This is a legit political issue because it can ruin the lives of peaceful people. It doesn't ruin their lives because of incest itself, instead the government is who ruins their lives with their unjust laws.

Seeing as I think it's best to assume love is not a choice, I think if any 2 peaceful people consent to loving each other, then I don't think it's wrong because it is not harming anyone. Children created through incest does not have bad effects like people think it does and the chances are just as small as a non-incest couple giving birth to a baby with birth defects. Also, farmers inbreed cattle and other livestock and chances are we are eating inbred meat when we eat at a place like McDonalds.

If you make a claim of incest causing deformities in children, then please show photos of people you know personally and proof that you know them personally to justify your claim (because otherwise people could lie in an attempt to debunk something that they don't agree with).

Make sure that all comments and posts are within the policy rules like this post is.
We need to respect the site. And please no shit talking. Lets have a rational, logical, debunking debate.


Lol.

jwicklun 01/19/13 12:32 AM

After the statutory rape thread, I'm pretty sure this guy is only here to cause a ruckus.

MisfitsFan2013 01/19/13 12:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by birdman (Post 117901732)
I actually do know a woman who is a product of incest, and while I am not going to post her photo because I am a decent human being, I can tell you that she has numerous medical afflictions. None of which manifest themselves physically.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ricketts (Post 117905312)
Not posting photos because that's pretty terrible but I know a woman who was a child of incest. She's actually very pretty but she had some problems. She had some serious jaw surgeries and braces for like 6 years. She also has heart & lung conditions.


That's 2 cases, unless you are both talking about the same person. However, in certain Chinese dynasties, it was considered dishonorable to marry or breed outside of their bloodline. Not all of them had a bunch of problems. Do people really base their views on things like the movie Deliverance?

Do you know someone that is the product of half-blooded incest?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ricketts (Post 117905312)
I pretty much agree with Birdman. I don't care if they want to be together but you can't force them not to have children. So, with the interest of the potential child in mind, I'm content with the laws as they are.


The current laws can put someone in prison for life in some states, and 25 years in most states. The only one it's not a crime in is Rhode Island. That's wrong. They are doing nothing wrong, they are being peaceful.

EDIT: They could legalize incest sodomy and keep incest sex illegal, mandate abortions. But I don't agree with this until I see more evidence that defects are very common.

Quote:

Originally Posted by open mind (Post 117903432)
someone wants to bang their 13 year old sister.


I don't have a 13 year old sister.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Qadriyyah (Post 117904812)
Also I see what you're trying to do, OP. Not cool, stop being an ass.


thank you

Quote:

Originally Posted by zion the lion (Post 117905042)
Time out. Love is totally a choice.


By "love" I meant attraction. I still think attraction is a choice but I think it's best to assume it's not a choice.

open mind 01/19/13 12:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MisfitsFan2013 (Post 117907762)
I don't have a 13 year old sister.

first cousin?

jwicklun 01/19/13 01:10 AM