AbsolutePunk.net
   Username
Password
This Thread is Closed.
 
Share
03:28 PM on 08/28/12 
Offline
User Info.
NewAgeofHorus
Registered User
NewAgeofHorus's Avatar
Great Barrier Reef
Male - 21 Years Old
Also, what would you say to someone who believed in the Mayan Doomsday theory?

If someone believed in it today? I would ask why do they because it was widely reported a few months ago that the 'doomsday' stuff can't be. And I would listen to their opinion because they could still have a decent reason.
03:29 PM on 08/28/12 
Offline
User Info.
NewAgeofHorus
Registered User
NewAgeofHorus's Avatar
Great Barrier Reef
Male - 21 Years Old
Okay guys, I'm going to taco bell. What should I get? I'm thinking of a volcano burrito.
03:31 PM on 08/28/12 
Offline
User Info.
CollectiveConfusion
CollectiveConfusion's Avatar
New York NY
Male - 24 Years Old
Band Member
There was never evidence and no one ever said there was evidence.

I don't know how you're trying to compare something that wasn't a conspiracy to a conspiracy that has evidence. People assuming it was a 'doomsday' just because it was the end of a calendar isn't evidence.
People believing in an occultic/secret society agenda that has books/videos with people being blunt about the agenda IS evidence.

There are a lot of books and videos about the Mayan apocalypse too. So, by your definition, that's evidence. Do you see the flaw in your logic? These are identical situations. You just don't believe in this one.
03:32 PM on 08/28/12 
Online
User Info.
Jake Gyllenhaal
Watch out for the Crocs!
Jake Gyllenhaal's Avatar
Okay guys, I'm going to taco bell. What should I get? I'm thinking of a volcano burrito.

Go to Pizza Hut instead

03:33 PM on 08/28/12 
Offline
User Info.
caveBEAR
( ω )
caveBEAR's Avatar
Palm Coast, FL
Male - 26 Years Old
If someone believed in it today? I would ask why do they because it was widely reported a few months ago that the 'doomsday' stuff can't be. And I would listen to their opinion because they could still have a decent reason.

What would you do if you felt they didn't have a decent enough reason?
04:14 PM on 08/28/12 
Online
User Info.
gfxtwin
Registered User
gfxtwin's Avatar
Male - 28 Years Old
It's hipster-racism. They say they're being ironic when they're actually just being racist. They act like we live in some post-racial, colorblind society (not recognizing that a post-racial, colorblind society is racist as fuck) so it's okay to say that shit because "OBVIOUSLY I'm just making fun of the past because there is no way that anyone actually believes that. Only KKK members can be racist, duh. You're racist for pointing out my racism". Then I get to hear that same stupid art school kid rant about the black and asian kids getting in on sub-par talent and how he has to pay for their education and how he is essentially being punished for being white. Doesn't matter that he himself is a shitty photographer (who spends his time taking pictures of white kids in warbonnets, but he's definitely not racist) and is going to school on a scholarship. He earned that, but there's no way the non-white kids did.

P.s. sorry that turned into a rant, haha. I just know way too many assholes. Fuck Iowa.

Believe me, I'm with you for the most part! I still live in Texas and I've lost count of how many times I've had run-ins with asshole bullies growing up.

I want to expand on some of what you said though: I think a lot of hipster racism is coming from more of a white guilt place rather than one of wanting to live in a colorblind society. There are indeed plenty of people who use ironic racism to veil oldschool racism, though. I think some people who make racist jokes for the sake of irony are also fairly liberal and they feel like they are being anti-racist by no longer ignoring the issue and using every moment to make fun of racist thinking. That used to be my philosophy. But what I found over time, though, is that this doesn't work really well, because 1) those jokes should are EASY/OBVIOUS if you're not racist (which makes for shitty humor that really isn't that edgy) and 2) the logical conclusion of that humor is saying extremely fucked up stuff with a straight face for the sake of a laugh (luckily I never felt compelled to take it that far). It doesn't take into account that it can still be awkward, if not hurtful for an oppressed group. It's not cool to do what comedians/artists like Robert Crumb, John Maayer and Daniel Tosh do in society because, first off, they make a living off of it and a comfortable living at that. And second, if someone is making these jokes and they're white and are living in a nice part of town with lots of material possessions, they just look like a douche. The only real way to fight racism is to speak out against it from an attitude of empathy and love for underprivileged groups, to be intolerant of intolerance, and to help out underprivileged groups whenever and however possible. IMO. This has been my stance on it for some time. It should be more common, but unfortunately compassion is a rarity these days.
03:41 AM on 08/29/12 
Offline
User Info.
Takk...Ros
No, I am not sorry
Takk...Ros's Avatar
Female - 20 Years Old
Yeah, it's really difficult to stay calm, so I've admittedly given up on that haha. At this point I feel like my peers are old enough that they should understand privilege by now, and if they don't know this by their 20's then they know how to Google. I still try to reason, but I'm just realizing how pointless it seems lately. omg no sexism discussions are enough to get me angry for weeks, and I'm not an angry person haha. After tons of men have tried to tell me what is and isn't sexist, tell me I'm sensitive, overreacting, have no sense of humor, etc it''s just ugh. I hope most of them will grow up and realize that women are their wives/mothers/sisters/friends/daughters/etc and not just "stupid whores," but they can be a bitter bunch.

And yeah, a lot of white people need to constantly be reassured that they're not racist. It totally turns the discussion into a sensitive issue for the white people where they get all coddled to not feel like a big bad racist, which is so backwards.
I think I'm just going to start telling people to google it haha. I'm not an angry person either, but once we start talking about this kind of stuff I just can't stay calm. It's like, "You are thirty years old! How do you not get this by now?". And yeah we're oversensitive, but if you mention 'patriarchy' it's "OMG NOEZ! WHAT ABOUT THE MEN!?!?!11!". And that is exactly what happened in this thread too. "Yeah there's racism, but you are just sensitive and WHAT ABOUT MEEEEEEEEE?1?!!? Whatever lol.

I'm glad someone gets it though :). So I'm just going to remember that next time it comes up and hopefully there are more people out there who understand than we realize.
Believe me, I'm with you for the most part! I still live in Texas and I've lost count of how many times I've had run-ins with asshole bullies growing up.

I want to expand on some of what you said though: I think a lot of hipster racism is coming from more of a white guilt place rather than one of wanting to live in a colorblind society. There are indeed plenty of people who use ironic racism to veil oldschool racism, though. I think some people who make racist jokes for the sake of irony are also fairly liberal and they feel like they are being anti-racist by no longer ignoring the issue and using every moment to make fun of racist thinking. That used to be my philosophy. But what I found over time, though, is that this doesn't work really well, because 1) those jokes should are EASY/OBVIOUS if you're not racist (which makes for shitty humor that really isn't that edgy) and 2) the logical conclusion of that humor is saying extremely fucked up stuff with a straight face for the sake of a laugh (luckily I never felt compelled to take it that far). It doesn't take into account that it can still be awkward, if not hurtful for an oppressed group. It's not cool to do what comedians/artists like Robert Crumb, John Maayer and Daniel Tosh do in society because, first off, they make a living off of it and a comfortable living at that. And second, if someone is making these jokes and they're white and are living in a nice part of town with lots of material possessions, they just look like a douche. The only real way to fight racism is to speak out against it from an attitude of empathy and love for underprivileged groups, to be intolerant of intolerance, and to help out underprivileged groups whenever and however possible. IMO. This has been my stance on it for some time. It should be more common, but unfortunately compassion is a rarity these days.
Omg the bolded, this this this. Jokes based on racist and sexist humor aren't funny anymore. Not because we don't have a sense of humor or we're 'oversensitive', but because we have heard them all before a million times. And, yes, sometimes they are hurtful too, but mostly they're just not funny and if you rely on humor like that you're not funny. You're not 'edgy' and 'pushing the envelope'. You're a hack. I also agree with what you say about being white and living large and then making fun of minorities. It's doubly painful when you take into account how many successful comics are white males. I'm not mad at them for being successful, but I do get a little mad that they're making their fortune on the backs of people who will probably not make it in that industry to tell their own stories and jokes. They cry when they get criticized for racism, but don't understand how painful it is to watch somebody profit off your pain. Same with guys who tell rape jokes. Now I don't want to write off that men can be and are raped or that women can be and are rapists, but it is overwhelmingly males who rape females. When 1 in 5 women are sexually assaulted in their lives, watching people from the demographic statistically most likely to hurt you tell you how hilarious it is when they do isn't funny. It's fucked up.

I agree with your stance on combating racism and I think a big part of this "ironic racism", which is indistinguishable from racist-racism, is because speaking up and out is hard. It's easier to make jokes that go with the status quo and say you are making fun of the racism itself, even though racists laugh at it too because it goes along with their worldview, than to actually confront someone for being jerks. And sorry that I went all ranty again, lol.
04:31 AM on 08/29/12 
Offline
User Info.
NewAgeofHorus
Registered User
NewAgeofHorus's Avatar
Great Barrier Reef
Male - 21 Years Old
There are a lot of books and videos about the Mayan apocalypse too. So, by your definition, that's evidence. Do you see the flaw in your logic? These are identical situations. You just don't believe in this one.

No, the books never state any evidence, I used to look through some a few years ago to even see if there was any. As its all speculations in the books too, basically every book about the Mayan apocalypse is the author's own opinion about it.
04:32 AM on 08/29/12 
Offline
User Info.
NewAgeofHorus
Registered User
NewAgeofHorus's Avatar
Great Barrier Reef
Male - 21 Years Old
What would you do if you felt they didn't have a decent enough reason?

I would say "okay" and carry on about my day. I'm not interested in the Mayan calendar enough to care.
04:33 AM on 08/29/12 
Offline
User Info.
NewAgeofHorus
Registered User
NewAgeofHorus's Avatar
Great Barrier Reef
Male - 21 Years Old
Go to Pizza Hut instead


Holy hell. Now that's a pizza.
04:42 AM on 08/29/12 
Offline
User Info.
magicrat85
ThankYou, but, I know I am right
magicrat85's Avatar
sunshine state
Male - 27 Years Old
I'm more interested in declassified events. Such as Operation Northwoods, MK Ultra, The Tuskegee Syphilis Study, C.I.A. drug running in LA and many many more. I think understanding these occurrences of past corruption is the key to understand more modern things such as 911 lies or the police state.

never heard of this one
05:06 AM on 08/29/12 
Offline
User Info.
suicidesaints
A Million F@$% Diamonds
suicidesaints's Avatar
Dallas
Male - 29 Years Old
ITT: People who don't understand the difference between 'opinion' and 'assertion'.

OPINION: 'I like chocolate cake, it's my favorite flavor.'
ASSERTION: 'Chocolate cake is the best flavor of cake.'

HUGE ASSERTIONS: 'JFK was killed by the mob/CIA, world leaders are enacting the New World Order, 9/11 was set up/allowed by the government, the Georgia Guidestones are more than bullshit art, etc., etc.'

Opinions do not need to be backed up - nobody can tell you that chocolate cake isn't your favorite flavor; however, once you make the assertion that chocolate cake is the best flavor of cake, you'd need evidence to back it up, as you're now attempting to extrapolate your opinion onto other people.

Same goes for the conspiracy theories - they are not your opinions, they are your assertions, and therefore need to be backed up by more than quotes out of context/never happened, videoes you saw once in high school, unsourced conspiracy sites, etc.

I agree, there is a difference between an opinion and an assertion, and I'll admit to having made quite a few assertions. However I still feel like there are major reasons for me to feel the way that I do about certain things. Maybe I shouldn't attempt to extrapolate my opinions on other people who are just on the other end of the computer waiting to shoot me down.

I understand that some of you hold strong beliefs that these theories are crazy, but when you don't take the time to actually give a intellectual explanation as to why, it feels like you are just waiting to see what we (conspiracy theorists) will post next, so that you can debunk it.

I really think you should take a look at each piece of evidence that is presented to you, and judge it solely on its own. Don't immediately assume that it's bullshit, just because it talks about a "conspiracy" - Conversely I don't believe everything I read/hear about a conspiracy, just because it's a conspiracy.
05:14 AM on 08/29/12 
Offline
User Info.
suicidesaints
A Million F@$% Diamonds
suicidesaints's Avatar
Dallas
Male - 29 Years Old
I'm more interested in declassified events. Such as Operation Northwoods, MK Ultra, The Tuskegee Syphilis Study, C.I.A. drug running in LA and many many more. I think understanding these occurrences of past corruption is the key to understand more modern things such as 911 lies or the police state.

never heard of this one

I thought that this was fairly well reported.
05:25 AM on 08/29/12 
Offline
User Info.
magicrat85
ThankYou, but, I know I am right
magicrat85's Avatar
sunshine state
Male - 27 Years Old
I agree, there is a difference between an opinion and an assertion, and I'll admit to having made quite a few assertions. However I still feel like there are major reasons for me to feel the way that I do about certain things. Maybe I shouldn't attempt to extrapolate my opinions on other people who are just on the other end of the computer waiting to shoot me down.

I understand that some of you hold strong beliefs that these theories are crazy, but when you don't take the time to actually give a intellectual explanation as to why, it feels like you are just waiting to see what we (conspiracy theorists) will post next, so that you can debunk it.

I really think you should take a look at each piece of evidence that is presented to you, and judge it solely on its own. Don't immediately assume that it's bullshit, just because it talks about a "conspiracy" - Conversely I don't believe everything I read/hear about a conspiracy, just because it's a conspiracy.

Just because you dissagree with it, does not mean the time was not taken to come up with our responses.
06:14 AM on 08/29/12 
Offline
User Info.
CollectiveConfusion
CollectiveConfusion's Avatar
New York NY
Male - 24 Years Old
Band Member
No, the books never state any evidence, I used to look through some a few years ago to even see if there was any. As its all speculations in the books too, basically every book about the Mayan apocalypse is the author's own opinion about it.

Yes, it's all speculation. Speculation based on ancient writings from various cultures (most taken out of context), symbols from said cultures, tall tales and other people's findings on the subject cobbled together to form a theory. Whether or not you want to admit it (you won't) these are identical scenarios. They're both patchwork bits and pieces of information glued together to form one cohesive idea. Neither is more valid than the other.
 



NEWS, MUSIC & MORE
Search News
Release Dates
Exclusives
Best New Music
Submit News
CONNECT
Forums
Contests
RSS
Mobile Version
Banners, Flyers, Widgets
HIDDEN TREASURES
Free Music
Video News
Sports Forum
AP.net Related News
Recommendations
INFORMATION
FAQ
Contact Us
Copyright Policy
Terms of Service
Privacy Policy
FOLLOW
Twitter | Facebook
PropertyOfZack
PunkNews.org
UnderTheGun
AlterThePress