How does it not make sense? I understand it's two different reviewers, but when the scores are all over the place it just looks wrong. AP's "Flamingo" score will probably be the highest of any publication by about 20%.
so you would rather have every score be the exact same? And also, how are either of us supposed to censor our opinion so that there aren't negative and positive reviews posted on the same day? I didn't like this record. Ian liked that one. I don't see how there's any way, sort of losing any of the opinion that reviews are supposed to have, that we could fix this problem that so unnecessarily plagues you.