Thank you, guys! Not my best review-writing, as it was hard to put so much I wanted to say into each review. I feel like I could have written a small book about his early works. But I hope they're read-able.
So here's my question: are there going to be reviews of shitty/unpopular albums by mainstream artists included in this series, or just big hits? It was pretty predictable that every album was going to be within the 95-100 scale here. I'd much rather see you give an honest critique of what didn't work on a record than just wax poetic about records we already know are classics.
Just my two cents.
I am actually quite interested in doing retro reviews of classics that I don't agree with. Probably will be a lot of Led Zeppelin and Beatles on there. I don't know if it will ever happen, though, just because these take a HUGE chunk of time to write. The future of this feature is probably 10-year anniversary reviews (think NFG's Sticks and Stones
, for example), and maybe like 25- or 30-year anniversaries. I'm going to do Boston's self-titled for its 35th anniversary.