yeah, an 88?
I don't bitch about scores often, but this is honestly at least a 93.
Especially since you reviewed RFTS and gave it a 95 and in this review you say that War Paint is better than RFTS....I must be lost.

Originally Posted by Blake Solomon

ha, lord, forget the score. enjoy the record.

I have enjoyed the record. I'm just pointing it out, haha.

Originally Posted by Until The Bombs

Couple thoughts:

1) No one can perceive music through a vacuum. I guess that's why "I view War Paint in a vacuum" is contradicted by the previous statement that "there are hints of The Starting Line and The Graduate."
2) I've read reviews that poorly describe an album's sound, but I've never read a review that told me less about the album's sound than this one.
3) If you don't have anything to say, don't say anything at all.



4) Have you heard the album?
5) How does an 88 warrant any bitching? That's a great score.

Yeah, I have the album. I'm not saying an 88 is a bad score, it's just contradicting that Blake said in this review that War Paint is better than RFTS and gave War Paint an 88% and RFTS a 95%.

War Paint is at least a 93%.

Originally Posted by pleasedontask

did this leak or something? how did so many people in here hear it, haha.

It's not too hard to get an album early and if you ask the band to hear a few tracks at a show, they'll probably let you.

Originally Posted by Brissona

no because in the end it is really just a number.

Is that 88 really going to stop you from going out and getting the record if he has said that it is better than RFTS?

I don't care what the number is jesus, I just pointed out that he gave rfts a higher rating than this and in the review he says War Paint is better than rfts.

I have the album already and I love it, his number means shit to me. I already preordered the vinyl and I'm buying the CD on Warped.