|Hint: Have a news tip? Submit us news.|
Front Page Discussion: Longevity
|I went and saw the Bayside/Saves the Day tour the other night and it got me thinking a lot about longevity. How did those two bands last so much through one of the most progressive times in the music industry? How did they survive against the elements of death, label issues and pleasing longtime fans? Hit the replies and let's talk about not what makes a hold any sort of longevity past "putting out good music." What makes you continue to see your favorite bands year after year or multiple times a year at that?|
|#bayside #front page discussion #saves the day #show review|
08:18 AM on 11/04/11
I'm not used to this temptation
Second to last sentence makes no sense.
08:21 AM on 11/04/11
one two three fo fiffffffffffffffff
let's talk about not what makes a hold any sort of longevity past "putting out good mus
08:27 AM on 11/04/11
This. Confusing and bad sentence structure. Adam, you rock however :)
08:28 AM on 11/04/11
second to last sentence made my head hurt.
08:31 AM on 11/04/11
I wouldn't say that it's Saves the Day that's lasted... Sure, the name has... And Chris has always been the frontman in all aspects, but the music and people have changed so much throughout the years.
Bands need to bring in a loyal fanbase from the start, and keep that fan base involved.
08:44 AM on 11/04/11
When you make a solid enough connection with a band, that's when you see them time after time after time.
08:49 AM on 11/04/11
I got a lion in my pocket I'm lying
Bayside managed to progress without progressing. By that I mean even though they're sound has gotten crisper and more mature, the bands sound has changed very little. They consistently put out great records with catchy hooks, I can't think of a single bayside song that I don't like and that helps too. Saves the Day on the other hand was such a big name in the genre that everyone has at least one STD song that brings them back to the good old days (similar to TBS, Blink, NFG, or BN). It's the emotional connection to the band that keeps long time fans at least curious to hear new music.
08:58 AM on 11/04/11
"Saves the Day" as a band is more or less only Chris, so I think the dynamics there are different than a band like Bayside (with who, admittedly, I'm not overly familiar).
Saves the Day released their seminal albums when the 'scene' was burgeoning and gained quite a few followers who have continued to go to STD the shows over the years. Combine that with older people saying to new kids, "Hey if you're in to ___________ 2011 emo/pop punk band, check out old Saves the Day" and those kids going to shows. I don't think there's much more to it than that.
09:00 AM on 11/04/11
Next Show: Dropkick Murphys @Boston
Ha, two bands with glaring flaws:
Bayside: the live set is stale and short
Saves the Day: their discography 2003-2010 is a major blemish on an otherwise great run
09:12 AM on 11/04/11
I couldn't disagree with you more. They just played an hour set when I saw them last week and it was great. I haven't missed a show of theirs in the last 3 years... because it's not stale whatsoever.
09:17 AM on 11/04/11
I love how people ignore the question and just pick apart Bayside and STD instead. I guess no matter who the examples were (Brand New, TBS, etc) people would question their longevity legitimacy.
09:30 AM on 11/04/11
Disagree, I just caught Bayside this past month and it was the best show I've been to in almost a year, a near perfect setlist and they played for an hour.
09:47 AM on 11/04/11
die young and save yourself
at the end of the day, longevity comes from connecting to your fans in a way that induces nostalgia. people have to associate your music with either a good time in their past or a difficult time that your music helped them get past. in my opinion, that's why blink 182 got so huge in the first place and was still able to catch people's interest when they released an album after an 8-year break. Of course, there is no set formula for accomplishing this, and it's pretty easy to tell when bands are try to manufacture nostalgia vs. being naturally nostalgic.
Related News Stories