I just cannot agree with it. I refuse to believe California is more deserving of Drexel or even Washington at this point!
And I don't disagree with Iona, even if it's the sole reason why Seton Hall probably missed out.
ehh idk man.
i can definitely see an argument for Seton Hall or Marshall over Cal, but hell no to washington. They had extremely similar numbers, cal beat them, and the big difference...
Cal vs. top 100 (9-7)
Wash v top 100 (4-9)
thats a large difference.
like i said now if you wanna say, well, Seton Hall had actually better wins, like yeah they had 3 top 50 wins compared to california's 0...but im telling you washington stinks, and Drexels' sub 200 SOS and Nconference SOS are just toooooooooo ugly.
it might not be drexels fault as we've discussed, since its hard for the CAA to schedule teams, but Sub 200 is just tooo brutal.
Cal vs. Hall vs. Drexel vs. Washington.... i could totally see Hall winning that argument, but i def have cal over drexel/washington. But again, we know we cant complain, 8-10 in conference :(.