Maybe it's just me, but this tattoo doesn't really look like a "battered woman" to me (more likely a woman with half her face painted as a mexican sugar-skull or a zombie or something). Chris Brown is still (and probably will always be) a piece of shit, but I think everybody here is grabbing their pitchforks a bit too quickly.
Social media for you. Theres always a post here and there on this site everyone should just shake their head at. It's clearly not Rihanna nor do I think it's a "battered woman", but I do wonder why rich celebrities always wind up with the ugliest tattoos that look done by the worst artists.