i wouldn't agree with the person above, who said it's just below average. a 4 is really low for me to give. but like...it's not a 3 you know? or a 2 or a 1? haha. there's some redeeming qualities in there obviously...mainly the two first released songs and parts of other tracks. there are extremely short segments that i really like, then something goes wrong...it makes for a frustrating listen
i'd say a 7 is more average. maybe that's just me - kinda like school grading? i dunno. i don't pay too much mind to the score, i think what i wrote about the record does a pretty good job of getting my thoughts across
Yeah, review does the talking. Just wondering because the scoring method seems to vary among staffers
I don't doubt this album is bad but i mean is it really 55% worse than the Cab's last album? I understand that different reviewers have different scales and taste but I mean this site is just so inconsistent with its reviewing scores its hard to really have a perspective of what albums are actually good.
You have to understand the different reviewers' individual tastes. Look at the scores in that context. And The Cab's album is better, I'm guessing most people wouldn't say it's 55% better, but then again most people wouldn't have given it a 95%.