This review is really all over the place. I'm not a hardcore Phantogram fan, so don't think I'm taking anything personally here, but it needs to be reiterated: you cannot describe an album as "a miss in every sense of the word" and "painful" then say two-thirds of the tracks are "good", two or three are "can't miss" and give an overall score of 70%. That's not a credible way to go about reviewing something, because you are saying very contradictory things all at once. It's totally fine if you wanted more from the album, but this review comes off as rather ... to borrow your own descriptor, "histrionic".
As I said earlier, I probably was being way too generous by saying seven of the songs were good. I was really just trying to give the band benefit of the doubt. I also said in the comments that really at most, four or five songs are terrific. If there's indecision in the review, it's because I really wanted to like the album. In trying to find winning moments I probably overshot and gave undue credit to at least a couple songs.
As for the rating a 7, anyone who knows my review criteria knows that an album has to be god-awful to get less than a 6 from me. Voices is not god awful. Sarah can sing, and they craft electro-rock well. It's just hopelessly boring. But its not like they are not proficient at what they do. Their back catalog proves that.