All you need is a record collection to be a reviewer. At least the real critics were in a band or had friends in bands. Some know how to play an instrument or write a song, something to give them some credibility.I mean why bother reviewing a record and giving it a 33/100, seems like a waste of time. I would just write nothing at all, and it saves public embarrassment. This is kind of like posting your failing grade at school in front of everyone. Useless.
It would be ok if it had any merit, and it was constructive and knowledgable.
Too many young bands trying to make it out there, who needs this shit?
What the fuck is wrong with you? If a band sucks(much like this one), they deserve a low score. Would you give Brokencyde, Millionaires, etc, a high score just because they're young bands?
..and we're all great reviewers. You don't need to be in a band to be able to critique music.