A 100% score is a little silly to me but I can't really understand how you review something without it being subjected to your experiences and biases (not using bias in a negative way). There is really no way to review a piece of creative work and be completely objective. What are the criteria? I personally like when reviewers can filter what they have seen, read, listened to and can give some indication of what was on the screen/page/record and just as importantly, how it made them feel and what their reaction was (bullshit adjectives and all).
It wouldn't have criteria, it would be a like a list of what's on the album. How many ballads, how many heavier songs, how many mid tempo ones? How many songs are on the same vibe, what does that vibe sound like? Is it like fully cohesive or do they try a bunch of different sounds? Are the lyrics like telling a story or about a bunch of different themes? What is on this record and not how you feel about it, meaning it would have no score. This shit is all theoretical.